On Tue, Jun 29, 20048:42 AM, the following words from Wayne Brissette
[EMAIL PROTECTED], emerged from a plethora of SPAM ...
Ben Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tuesday, June 29, 2004 stated:
HTML/XML mail or similar will sooner or later supersede the pure text
messages of today, no matter what
Jeffrey, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If that's how you want your email, you probably need to
use a different program
This is not a useful response. I absolutely hate it when some
people respond to a problem like that. The user can't be
blaimed for the format of mail that is sent to
Ben Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tuesday, June 29, 2004 stated:
HTML/XML mail or similar will sooner or later supersede the pure text
messages of today, no matter what PM users think about it.
Not without one helluva fight, it won't... (and we PM users are not
exclusive with this opinion)
Ben
Mikael Byström [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tuesday, June 29, 2004 stated:
This is not useful with international umlauts.
Mikael:
The only way we have been able (we being my soon to be former employer)
to make this work 100% of the time is by using UTF-8. Of course as
Hiroaki will point out, UTF-8 is
On 29 6 2004 at 7:22 am -0400, Mikael Byström wrote:
HTML/XML mail or similar will sooner or later supersede the pure text
messages of today, no matter what PM users think about it.
Not without one helluva fight, it won't... (and we PM users are not
exclusive with this opinion)
Of course, the
Jeffrey, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If that's how you want your email, you probably need to
use a different program
This is not a useful response. I absolutely hate it when some people
respond to a problem like that. The user can't be blaimed for the format
of mail that is sent to him/her.
If
John R. Hopper wrote:
When trying to send a message, a dialog box saying A file error
occurred, clicking on more info shows Class=file; what=100; when=1;
err=-50. This happens twice before being returned to message compose
window.
This is a file related problem, but I don't see exactly what.
At least it works for me
how many copies of SpamSieve you have on your Mac.
I think it should be only 1.
All the best
Matthias
---
schmidt-systemdevelopment
http://www.schmidt-system.com
iChat/AIM: MatKoyasan
Tel. +31-736-56-3905
On 28/06/2004 at 8:27 PM I saw cheshirekat type:
This message is about the Views menu and viewing options.
First, shouldn't View Options... be listed right under the View All,
View Unread and View Only... choices?
No idea. Sounds like a good idea.
Secondly, I prefer the 3 pane views of the
Am 29.6.2004 hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] geschrieben:
Put SpamSieve to the Application Folder.
That should work ...
All the best
Matthias
It does definitly not! Different to PM 5.0
Since PM 5.01, the program is allways (means: once after mounting) asking
where SpamSieve is.
Seems to be a bug.
Put SpamSieve to the Application Folder.
That should work ...
All the best
Matthias
---
schmidt-systemdevelopment
http://www.schmidt-system.com
iChat/AIM: MatKoyasan
Tel. +31-736-56-3905
---
Am/On Tue, 29
Since Version 5.01 PM always ask for SpamSieve. After manually selecting
from the
'Where is SpamSieve'-Window, it works. But after closing SpamSieve, PM
ask again.
SpamSieve is still placed in the unmodified PM-Folder.
Greetings
Oliver
[John R. Hopper [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 29.6.2004 um 7:20 Uhr:]
Are there others out there using Powermail 5 and OS 10.2.8?
Yes, me. Works perfectly.
--
http://www.subhash.at
Hi, we also have the same SMTP server, and it works for my accounts on
that server. I just created an account for her email address on my
powermail, and was able to send mail - tried it again from hers, and
still no go. I then started up Powermail 4.2.1 on hers, created a new
user environment
Howdy all!
This message is about the Views menu and viewing options.
First, shouldn't View Options... be listed right under the View All,
View Unread and View Only... choices?
Secondly, I prefer the 3 pane views of the Browser Layout because then I
don't have PM message windows opening in
I had already run the IPhoto Mailer Patcher version 2.0, but it still
does not recognize PowerMail. I ran the Patcher again restoring iPhoto to
its original state and then ran the Patcher again. Same problem.
Any ideas?
Thanks, Dan
PowerMail discussions, Mon, Jun 28, 2004
yes, correct.
---marlyse
former message(s) quotes: -
make sure that 'stop applying filter...' checkbox is enabled - if not, it
will just continue down the filter list.
---marlyse
Thanks Marlyse. Er, the window says:
.Don't apply subsequent filters to this
Could be that a setting in 'Outgoing SMTP Server' needs changing.
Have a word with your ISP.
Brian Jacobs
Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:23:48 +0200 John R. Hopper wrote:
I hope someone can help - my wife can't send mail from Powermail anymore
(powermail version is 5.0.1). I really don't understand.
1. The order in which the filters are applied.
Yes, Midi Cox wins tonight's star prize!!
Bingo. Thanks so much for pointing that out - and indeed to all the rest
who kindly replied. It's working fine now!
:-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
On 28/06/2004 at 2:18 PM I saw cheshirekat type:
That tiny and easy to overlook dot (eyeball?) that is for searching the
PM address book should be changed. Every time I end up in the PM address
book, I'm looking all over for a search trigger. There is a lot of space
next to the To, CC, and BCC
make sure that 'stop applying filter...' checkbox is enabled - if not, it
will just continue down the filter list.
---marlyse
Thanks Marlyse. Er, the window says:
.Don't apply subsequent filters to this message.
So that should be checked, right?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
21 matches
Mail list logo
