Re: Complex boolean filters (was: Re: Outgoing filters don't work?)

2004-06-21 Thread Christian Roth
PowerMail Engineering wrote: Christian Roth wrote: (from startswith kris OR from startswith roth) AND (account is 'Private') It is of course not as flexible as boolean expressions, but but you can do this with the following filter: [from] [includes at least one of the words] [kris* roth*]

Re: Complex boolean filters (was: Re: Outgoing filters don't work?)

2004-06-21 Thread PowerMail Engineering
Christian Roth wrote: Second, the need for understanding and using filter ordering and the stop checkbox partially comes from the fact that I cannot express a desired condition in one single filter only: (from startswith kris OR from startswith roth) AND (account is 'Private') It is of course

Complex boolean filters (was: Re: Outgoing filters don't work?)

2004-06-21 Thread Christian Roth
PowerMail Engineering wrote: Using both AND and OR operators in a filter would be way to difficult to configure for most users. A lot of users already have difficulties to order their filters and use the stop checkbox correctly, so a complex interface like this one just out of question. First,

Re: Boolean Filters

2004-06-21 Thread Wayne Brissette
On 21/06/2004 at 12:11 PM I saw PowerMail Engineering type: Christian Roth wrote: it would be a TREMENDOUS feature if the options within a filter could be individually grouped in a boolean fashion And for a IMO nice graphical interface solution to complex boolean expressions, see ChronoSync's

Re(2): Boolean Filters

2004-06-21 Thread fk
On 21/06/2004 at 12:11 PM I saw PowerMail Engineering type: Christian Roth wrote: it would be a TREMENDOUS feature if the options within a filter could be individually grouped in a boolean fashion And for a IMO nice graphical interface solution to complex boolean expressions, see ChronoSync's