Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:01:54 -0800, Martin Aspeli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that plone.relations would be a good way to achieve both of
these things.
+1 to what Martin said, and I'd like to add that I'd love to
(long-term) see if we can
Previously Alexander Limi wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:01:54 -0800, Martin Aspeli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that plone.relations would be a good way to achieve both of
these things.
+1 to what Martin said, and I'd like to add that I'd love to (long-term)
see if we can get
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi Rok,
I'd like to ditch the Archetypes dependency, at least in membrane
itself. It makes membrane a less attractive option for many high-volume
sites, and makes some things very complicated that need not be.
I'd also like to do some more performance
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Alexander Limi wrote:
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:01:54 -0800, Martin Aspeli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that plone.relations would be a good way to achieve both of
these things.
+1 to what Martin said, and I'd like to add that I'd love to (long-term)
i've had the same experience but didn't spend much time investigating
it. my guess is, that it's because the description field is part of
the dublin core.
i further suspect that there's the same bug in the way the description
field deals with unicode that i myself have produced in my own
Thanks, but this prevents the server to start up at all giving me an
UnicodeDecodeError.
I reported it as a bug so maybe you wanna comment there:
http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/8776
Cheers,
Martin
Am 05.12.2008 um 16:06 schrieb Tom Lazar:
i've had the same experience but didn't spend
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi Rok,
I'd like to ditch the Archetypes dependency, at least in membrane
itself. It makes membrane a less attractive option for many high-volume
sites, and makes some things very complicated that need not be.
I'd also like to do some
