On Aug 13, 2006, at 10:56 PM, Ken Kixmoeller (j/s) wrote:
the first to admit that I don't get it?
I got it at 6:00 this morning.
Ken
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT
On Aug 13, 2006, at 8:14 PM, Ken Dibble wrote:
What's wrong is periodically pulling the rug out from under
customers to force them to upgrade.
My point was that the naive customer would just go along in order to
get the latest/greatest because for so long, upgrades *did* get you
some
On Aug 13, 2006, at 9:22 PM, Garrett Fitzgerald wrote:
coke\tsprite
Do I have to be the first to admit that I don't get it? What is the
significance of the \t?
Ken
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
On Aug 9, 2006, at 12:45 PM, Andy Davies wrote:
I set it as my default
editor for Clipper
Ooh -- I had forgotten that -- I set it as my editor for dBase PRG's,
too. I still miss the phone dialer.
Ken
°
Ken Kixmoeller
Jaguar
On Aug 5, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
Rule #1: Customers do NOT know what's in their database.
Rule #2: When a customer assures you that their database is clean,
see rule #1.
My favorite example of that is an application I did just when eMail
was-a-comin' into general
On Aug 4, 2006, at 4:07 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
but they'll be back!
Servers named Arnold?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
On Jul 23, 2006, at 6:57 AM, Man-wai CHANG wrote:
IE files?
In the profile directory in Documents and Settings.
Thanks, but I don't see any cache files in there, just skins,
extensions and plug-ins.
Ken
___
Post Messages to:
On Jul 23, 2006, at 7:46 PM, Helio W. wrote:
Open a new tab and type about:cache in the URL field.
Got it, thanks.
Ken
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of
On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:49 PM, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
I had to read this sentence three times, and then get out a piece
of paper and draw a line graph in order to determine if Ted was
born...
...and you make fun of my 50+ eyes.
Ken
___
On Jul 13, 2006, at 4:18 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
Why is it that just your OT posts seem to leak through?
This is the only one I remember...
Ken
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
On Jul 13, 2006, at 9:15 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
[OT] The Klintonburg descending ... a problem with his email
client settings
Oh, yes, now I remember that one. Idle musing: if his eMail client
has a problem, I wonder why his other 2,538,452 OT posts *don't* leak
through?
Ken
On Jul 13, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
it might be a setting that's only in effect when he's
using a certain configuration, or perhaps one of several machines, or
perhaps it's a default setting that's getting reset on updates.
Well, Mr. Madigan - --
Any clues *you* can add?
Ken
On Jul 13, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
...formulating a question forces you to think
about the problem from a different POV...
What a bunch of mumbo-jumbo! It is the Send button. It is magic.
Simple as that.
Ken
___
Post Messages to:
On Jul 13, 2006, at 1:39 PM, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
possibly the funniest unintended one-liner of all movie history.
OK, I'll bite. What is it?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
On Jul 13, 2006, at 1:23 PM, Hal Kaplan wrote:
So there is something wrong with MM's SEND button, eh?
Every OT message Send diminishes the magic a small percent. MM and
CG are the best proof. g
Ken
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
On Jul 13, 2006, at 3:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the reply and the heads up on the 8125.
I don't know if you are saying you want those things or that the
device has them. It has all of those. I have one, too, the T-Mobile
version. I find it very clunky and hard to use, to
On Jul 13, 2006, at 4:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your points on the phone/toy. How is the battery life for
talking?
I don't talk on it all that much 4-10 calls/day. When I'm in the
office, I mostly use the land line for calling out. I have to
recharge it every-other
On Jul 12, 2006, at 8:58 AM, aj wrote:
I would like to create thumbnails of the pages
If you happen to own WebConnect, it has an image control that works
well and has been fast enough for me.
Ken
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
On Jul 11, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Whil Hentzen (Pro*) wrote:
I'd love to do something like this now because we're getting a LOT
of pirate hits from Undesirable Places and don't have a real good
way to stop them.
What kind of stuff is going on?
Ken
Hay - -- (oats)
Playing some more with PHP. Boxed myself into a corner where I need
to do a macro substitution-type of capability. For example, I have
bunches of variables like this:
...
$Q02_buzz
$Q02_fuzz
$Q02_suzz
$Q03_buzz
$Q03_fuzz
$Q03_suzz
...
I need to tease out the value of
On Jul 5, 2006, at 5:14 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
Does this help? http://us2.php.net/eval
Instead of macro-expanding just the variable, they eval() the
assignment of the variable to its literal string. Perhaps that
might be something that you could hack about.
Well, that is the one with
On Jun 30, 2006, at 9:50 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
You'll have to create another textbox from the new class, and then
assign any modified props to that new object, and then destroy the
original object.
Or put one on top of the other and selectively make them .enabled
and .visible as needed.
On Jun 26, 2006, at 7:43 AM, Profox wrote:
I would use an email obfuscator.
Hey, Jim - - -
I have had the feeling (but without any way to confirm it) that the
spammers are catching up with the obfuscation trick. I also think
they are getting the DOT and AT technique. (Lately, a small
On Jun 26, 2006, at 8:10 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
Which is why I use a random mix of obfuscation routines on every
page view.
Yeah, I know --- good idea --- but I wonder if the spammers are
catching on nevertheless. I know that if I were writing such a
routine, I would look for AT or @ or
On Jun 26, 2006, at 3:57 PM, Frank Burcaw wrote:
profox@leafe.com - is that the
correct address?
Yup
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
I've got a small restaurant *which* has four
interests, in order of priority:
I did a restaurant a couple of years ago. The realities are:
1. For all of the reasons Matt pointed out (and more), direct them to
buy an off-the-shelf POS system. The better POS systems already have
the
On Jun 22, 2006, at 2:50 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
Seems Marge doesn't like me...
But I did get this one, FYI
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
On Jun 22, 2006, at 4:43 PM, Jerry Wolper wrote:
You don't want to run out of Coors light for some reason
Couldn't you substitute water without customers noticing?
No, water has more taste! (*somebody* had to say it... ducking and
running to OT-land)
28 matches
Mail list logo
