TI-99 ... (Business Graphs 99). I wrote it in TI-Forth. It ran from a
floppy. Fun times.
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jerry
Wolper
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 2:20 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Funny flashback Friday
The British version of the Anglo-French Jaguar aircraft was one of the first
military aircraft to use digital computing. Its entire navigation and
weapon aiming system was in 8k of RAM - some very creative coding was needed
:-)
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
> > This all puts me in mind
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017, at 08:20 AM, Jerry Wolper wrote:
> >
> This all puts me in mind of the days when hard drives were a high-end
> option, operating systems weren't standardized, and software had to fit
> on
> the most restrictive machine's floppy. (The TI-99 for what I was doing.)
> There was l
> The only memory problems I see these days are to do with allocating
gigabytes and
> gigabytes of base memory to VM's... what a change from using 4Kb and 8Kb
machines
> which had to use overlays held on tape and/or the latest 2.5Mb (yes Mega
Byte) fixed
> Exchangeable drives (FEDS).
This all puts
On 2017-07-10 14:07, Paul H. Tarver wrote:
It's funny really. These days, I tell my clients how small of a
footprint my
applications will have on their systems because we can do full
installations
with data and debug logs fully populated with less than 100Mb.
It's surprising how many people th
ubject: Re: Funny flashback Friday memory
On 2017-07-10 04:29, Alan Bourke wrote:
>> > > wrote:
>>
>> > I recall back in the late 90s or early 2000s people poo-pooing the
>> > VFP installations that had to carry the 15 megabyte runtimes also
>> > besi
Yes. These are purely app servers and we have 100+ of them. Cleaning out
the non-necessary logs just to have room is a RPITA. At least for those
people in opps. I only have to maintain 3 SQL servers where I do run into
similar things.
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:45 AM, <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbs
On 2017-07-10 11:35, Stephen Russell wrote:
Our virtual server was set as a C & D drive each at 100 G.
Symantec anti-virus has killed that 100 G size on the C:\ making us
give
200 G for a C drive nowadays.
Wait...are you saying SAV needed a ton of space so that's why you
increased the drive
Our virtual server was set as a C & D drive each at 100 G.
Symantec anti-virus has killed that 100 G size on the C:\ making us give
200 G for a C drive nowadays.
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:11 AM, <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
> On 2017-07-10 04:29, Alan Bourke wrote:
>
>>
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Sent: 10 July 2017 16:11
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: Funny flashback Friday memory
On 2017-07-10 04:29, Alan Bourke wrote:
>> > > wrote:
>>
&g
On 2017-07-10 11:16, Alan Bourke wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, at 04:11 PM,
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
Does anybody complain about the size of any softwares anymore?
These days it tends to be complaining about major console game releases
requiring multi-GB day one patche
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, at 04:11 PM,
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
> Does anybody complain about the size of any softwares anymore?
These days it tends to be complaining about major console game releases
requiring multi-GB day one patches (up to 15GB is not unheard of) before
On 2017-07-10 04:29, Alan Bourke wrote:
wrote:
> I recall back in the late 90s or early 2000s people poo-pooing the VFP
> installations that had to carry the 15 megabyte runtimes also besides the
> program/application EXE itself. LOL
Ditto people complaining about the size of the .NET framew
> > wrote:
>
> > I recall back in the late 90s or early 2000s people poo-pooing the VFP
> > installations that had to carry the 15 megabyte runtimes also besides the
> > program/application EXE itself. LOL
Ditto people complaining about the size of the .NET framework.
--
Alan Bourke
alanp
Because a full install of your app didn't fit on one disk.
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 8:21 AM, wrote:
> I recall back in the late 90s or early 2000s people poo-pooing the VFP
> installations that had to carry the 15 megabyte runtimes also besides the
> program/application EXE itself. LOL
>
[excessi
I recall back in the late 90s or early 2000s people poo-pooing the VFP
installations that had to carry the 15 megabyte runtimes also besides
the program/application EXE itself. LOL
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http
On Behalf Of Ted Roche
> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 4:25 PM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: [NF] Friday Afternoon Discussion: Passwords
>
> I use LastPass, a cellphone for 2FA, and... an index card box full of
> pen-and-ink password notes. The latter has never been unav
Ted Roche
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2017 4:25 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Friday Afternoon Discussion: Passwords
I use LastPass, a cellphone for 2FA, and... an index card box full of
pen-and-ink password notes. The latter has never been unavailable when the
internets on the blink
I use LastPass, a cellphone for 2FA, and... an index card box full of
pen-and-ink password notes. The latter has never been unavailable when
the internets on the blink, never ran out of batteries, I've never
forgotten the cable or adapter, and it's pretty invulnerable to
440-pound hackers in Clevel
At 11:54 2017-05-08, "Paul H. Tarver" wrote:
[snip]
Woohoo! All this time I thought I was normal and today Ken confirmed I AM a
computer geek because I use LastPass!
I'm a member of a community! YEAH! :)
I just use a Word document. There goes *my* geek
status. Sniff, sniff. Good-by
>I use a password manager that syncs encrypted data over the internet so
>I have the same set of passwords on different machines of different
>OSes (Windows, Linux, ChromeOS, Android) and browsers. But none of
>these make it easy for desktop or console applications; you need to
>query the manag
On 2017-05-06 15:05, Ted Roche wrote:
Double-bonus goes to sites that double-check with an SMS or similar.
"Something you know (password) and something you have (cellphone)"
makes for good two-factor authentication.
I was thinking of adding that to my FabNet software. Shouldn't be hard
to d
Not so silly. There are password processes that depend on gestures
that are under testing. The ability to click and swipe through a
series of images is somewhat unique due to biomechanical parameters or
personal habits. I've also seen proposed some sort of facial
recognition. The sooner we get t
On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
> set silly on
> Hey, maybe we can have cameras watching for body motions as passwords.
> Since throwing up one's hands about the password problem is not workable,
> throwing up one's hands can be the new equivalent of having a password
+3
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
> Now it's me, O'Reilly, and the NIST +2
>
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/ma
At 15:35 2017-05-05, Ken Dibble wrote:
[snip]
Read the article. The data does not support the contention that
these are important enough vectors to justify the downside that
these recommendations have for users.
I did read the article. I do not agree with it.
Anybody who's got a dict
Now it's me, O'Reilly, and the NIST +2
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of AndyHC
Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2017 4:44 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Friday Afternoon Discussion: Passwords
On 05-May-17 11:35 PM,
On 05-May-17 11:35 PM, Ken Dibble wrote:
Now it's me, O'Reilly, and the NIST
Now it's me, O'Reilly, and the NIST +1
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this
1. Forcing people to frequently change passwords is not helpful. It
just makes it more likely that they will stick the password on a
Post-IT on their monitors because they can't remember it.
It does help some. If someone has your password but has not
changed it, because it would alert
At 10:17 2017-05-05, Ken Dibble wrote:
What I've been saying for years
From the O'Reilly Security Newsletter:
https://venturebeat.com/2017/04/18/new-password-guidelines-say-everything-we-thought-about-passwords-is-wrong/
1. Forcing people to frequently change passwords is not helpful. It
What I've been saying for years
From the O'Reilly Security Newsletter:
https://venturebeat.com/2017/04/18/new-password-guidelines-say-everything-we-thought-about-passwords-is-wrong/
1. Forcing people to frequently change passwords is not helpful. It
just makes it more likely that they wil
Brought back loads of memories - including the infamous Foundation Read
which I never really got my head round :-)
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
>
> "Foxpro - The Evolution of a New Standard"
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZqzJ6f3d7w
>
>
__
Ouch - spoke too soon - as the video continued, yup - I was right - it
was Dr. Fulton. I was there at the Fox Conf where FPD was 1st unveiled
to an uproarious crowd! People went Nuts when he typed:Modi comm *.prg
Then a hundred programs opened up on the screen. It was Exciting times
indeed
You know - I Really Wished that they put the people's names up as each
made their comments. Musta been like 5 people already in 1st 1 min. Not
sure if Tom Rettig was one of them. But, I believe the Dr. guy (Darn - I
forget his name right now) who was the founder - he was one of the
people who c
Ah those blues and purples ...
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mail
"Foxpro - The Evolution of a New Standard"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZqzJ6f3d7w
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/ma
On 2016-12-01 19:01, Charlie wrote:
FYI, I did more research on this and just never sent in an update.
The key point is whether or not the table was opened "EXCLUSIVE" or
not. If you open it exclusive, there is a "chance" the memo "block"
will be reused (if the new text size is the same or small
On 11/30/2016 5:40 PM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
One thing I put into my design is working with temporary cursors or
As I recall, the main reason for memo bloat was caused when saving
data. Specifically, if I was editing a memo, then saved it, if the
Just an update: fou
On 2016-11-03 17:31, Charlie wrote:
On 11/3/2016 2:24 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
[snip]
I'm handling one of Jeff Johnson's (RIP) clients and having this
issue.
I was about to create a simple utility for the end-user to grab the
table and pack it, but curious if you've got a better idea?
One th
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> Gene - agreed. Although, now according to Ted - we are NOT so Unusual!
> :-)
I think I am being misquoted out of context!
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.
, 2016 4:16 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
At 11:30 2016-11-04, Ted Roche wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
[snip]
> > Myself - never really worked within Frameworks. They just weren't
> used on t
Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 7:30 AM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
I've been an advocate for frameworks since I read the original Codebook
book, sitting in a parking lot in Cambridge (our fair city), Massachusetts.
Imag
At 07:40 2016-11-07, Dave Crozier wrote:
Frameworks are ok but only when you want to do the things that the
framework allows.
And at that point, you may be so deep in that it is made
difficult to break out.
This applies more generally to the approach one takes to one's
app. Some
At 11:30 2016-11-04, Ted Roche wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
[snip]
> Myself - never really worked within Frameworks. They just weren't
used on the various jobs I worked at. I did work on this one system
- where they guy had created Classes - and I used his exist
+1
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
> Jean Laeremans
> Sent: 07 November 2016 15:57
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
&
2016 18:00
Para: profox@leafe.com
Asunto: Re: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
Build my own set of custom classes (not worthy of calling a 'framework'
) but works for all my in-house projects.
Spend lot of time building a Data layer on the premise that I will
change the backen
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
>
> I also find that a set of classes, well written and tested are the best
> way to generate an application and they are easily updateable/modified
> using either a bae class update or using subclassing.
> -
Isn't that what a fram
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> Frameworks are ok but only when you want to do the things that the framework
> allows.
What was it you wanted to do that the framework wouldn't?
> I also find that a set of classes, well written and tested are the best way
> to generate an
-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 3:31 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
++1
-Mensaje original-
De: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] En nombre de Jean Laeremans
Enviado el: lunes, 07 de noviembre de 2016 16:57
Para: ProFox Email List
Asunto: Re: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
+1
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Dave Crozier wrote
teable/modified
> using either a bae class update or using subclassing.
>
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt
> Sent: 07 November 2016 15:25
> To: profox@leafe.com
> Subject: RE: Friday Poll: What fra
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt
Sent: 07 November 2016 15:25
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
Hey Ted - I hear ya - as I can also type fast. Learned touch-typing back in my
Jr. year in high
2-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 3:31 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Kurt We
Me too.
-Lew Schwartz
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Laurie Alvey wrote:
> Built my own. Couldn't afford the commercial ones and no client was willing
> to pay.
>
> Laurie
>
> On 4 November 2016 at 14:29, Ted Roche wrote:
>
> > I've been an advocate for frameworks since I read the original
Thanks Ed, didn't know that.
Laurie
On 5 November 2016 at 13:21, Edward Leafe wrote:
> On Nov 4, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Laurie Alvey wrote:
>
> > Built my own. Couldn't afford the commercial ones and no client was
> willing
> > to pay.
>
> Codebook was (still is) free.
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
>
>
>
>
[
On Nov 4, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Laurie Alvey wrote:
> Built my own. Couldn't afford the commercial ones and no client was willing
> to pay.
Codebook was (still is) free.
-- Ed Leafe
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: ht
Actually, it is just a very simple one, so simple that I dunno whether
it's a framework or not. :)
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
> So, what framework(s) do you work with, and why (or why not)?
_x_ Built my own
--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9
On 2016-11-04 18:36, Bill Anderson wrote:
To me this comes off a bit of "Floor Wax/Dessert Topping", except for
one important feature -- it works.
BWAHAHAHAHA LOVE THAT SNL SKIT!!!
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscri
On 2016-11-04 10:29, Ted Roche wrote:
So, what framework(s) do you work with, and why (or why not)?
__ Built my own
Rolled my own years ago. Built on the logical n-tier concept. Been
serving MBSS very well since 2004!
___
Post Messages to: ProF
this comes off a bit of "Floor
Wax/Dessert Topping", except for one important feature -- it works.
Bill Anderson
On Friday, November 4, 2016, Ted Roche wrote:
> I've been an advocate for frameworks since I read the original
> Codebook book, sitting in a parking lot i
s buy that framework for the projects that I've worked
on.
-Kevin
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 10:30 AM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Friday Poll: What framework(s) do you use?
So, what fram
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> Ted - You must have a Lot of extra time on your hands - what with creating
> all these Polls!
I type fast. And it's not like I haven't thought about this stuff for 25 years.
And my commute averages around zero minutes.
> Myself - never reall
sting classes to create new screens. But,
that's about it...
Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst
Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 10:30 AM
T
Codemine
Gojko B.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archi
Codemine
Gojko B.
At 15:29 4.11.2016, you wrote:
I've been an advocate for frameworks since I read the original
Codebook book, sitting in a parking lot in Cambridge (our fair city),
Massachusetts.
Imagine starting an application and not having to worry about how to
get the menu working (Help, A
At 07:29 2016-11-04, Ted Roche wrote:
[snip]
So, what framework(s) do you work with, and why (or why not)?
__ Built my own
It is this or nothing.
My boss has a way of asking for things that break my
paradigm. I would rather be trying to rework my code than someone else's.
At 14:06 2016-11-03, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
On 2016-11-03 14:24, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
I have a routine that packs and reindexes all of the tables. I
have not needed anything more involved.
I do see some memo bloat. I have a table that stores
configuration
At 12:06 2016-11-03, Ted Roche wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
> As possibly the last to answer -- is there a prize? -- let me state
> DBFs.
Mostly just stirring the pot. There's a wealth of knowledge here.
DBFs: 13
MS SQL Server: 8
1 each for everything el
Built my own. Couldn't afford the commercial ones and no client was willing
to pay.
Laurie
On 4 November 2016 at 14:29, Ted Roche wrote:
> I've been an advocate for frameworks since I read the original
> Codebook book, sitting in a parking lot in Cambridge (our fair city),
> Massachusetts.
>
>
I've been an advocate for frameworks since I read the original
Codebook book, sitting in a parking lot in Cambridge (our fair city),
Massachusetts.
Imagine starting an application and not having to worry about how to
get the menu working (Help, About, Copy/Cut/Paste, Print settings) and
getting ba
m: "mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com"
To: ProFox Email List
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: 2 GB memo bloat in DBF used in WebConnection site (was RE: Friday
Poll (while dl'ing MS Flash Patch))
On 2016-11-03 19:25, Richard Quilhot wrote:
> Divide the
On 2016-11-03 19:25, Richard Quilhot wrote:
Divide the data into smaller DBF's then add code the select the correct
small table that needs updating.
Not an option at this point. Besides...this table has only ONE memo
field.
___
Post Messages to:
Divide the data into smaller DBF's then add code the select the correct
small table that needs updating.
Rick Q
quilh...@gmail.com
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> At 08:56 2016-11-03, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
>
>> On 2016-10-28 10:24, Kevin J C
On 2016-11-03 17:31, Charlie wrote:
One thing I put into my design is working with temporary cursors or
objects (aka from SCATTER MEMO NAME oDataRec). I rarely have user
interface objects directly accessing DBFs.
I did this years ago with my MBSS framework based upon your ideas when
you p
On 11/3/2016 2:24 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
[snip]
I'm handling one of Jeff Johnson's (RIP) clients and having this issue.
I was about to create a simple utility for the end-user to grab the
table and pack it, but curious if you've got a better idea?
One thing I put into my design is working w
On 2016-11-03 14:24, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
I have a routine that packs and reindexes all of the tables. I
have not needed anything more involved.
I do see some memo bloat. I have a table that stores
configuration data. When packed, the .fpt is 1280 bytes. I see from
the latest sent
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
> As possibly the last to answer -- is there a prize? -- let me state
> DBFs.
>
Mostly just stirring the pot. There's a wealth of knowledge here.
DBFs: 13
MS SQL Server: 8
1 each for everything else: Azure, Excel, XML, SQLite, PostgreS
At 08:56 2016-11-03, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
On 2016-10-28 10:24, Kevin J Cully wrote:
X DBFs - I have a client that insisted I use DBFs for his desktop and
Web-Connection site. It's run almost flawlessly since 2008 with the
exception of the 'memo field bloat' issue. T
At 06:00 2016-10-28, Ted Roche wrote:
So, where's your data stored today?
__ DBFs
__ MS SQL Server
__ Azure
__ Postgres
__ My/MariaDB
__ Oracle
__ Excel
__ Other (please specify)
As possibly the last to answer -- is there a prize? -- let me state DBFs.
[snip]
Sincerely,
Gene Wi
On 2016-11-03 12:14, Kevin J Cully wrote:
I created a subclass of the wwMaint.prg and then put that behind an
authentication. I then added various PACKing routines: Some pack all
tables, others pack the "vulnerable to memo bloat" tables.
The problem is getting exclusive access to the tables. I
lient.
Tempted but I haven't gone through with it.
-Kevin
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 11:57 AM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: 2 GB memo bloat in DBF used in
On 2016-10-28 10:24, Kevin J Cully wrote:
X DBFs - I have a client that insisted I use DBFs for his desktop and
Web-Connection site. It's run almost flawlessly since 2008 with the
exception of the 'memo field bloat' issue. That's caught me a couple
of times over the years hitting the 2G limit per
On 2016-10-28 10:24, Kevin J Cully wrote:
X DBFs - I have a client that insisted I use DBFs for his desktop and
Web-Connection site. It's run almost flawlessly since 2008 with the
exception of the 'memo field bloat' issue. That's caught me a couple
of times over the years hitting the 2G limit pe
On 2016-10-28 10:59, Peter Cushing wrote:
__ DBFs
Yup - sooner or later we will look to move to SQL but we don't want to
rush into things
LOL!
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listin
On 2016-10-28 09:00, Ted Roche wrote:
So, where's your data stored today?
__ DBFs
__ MS SQL Server
__ Azure
__ Postgres
__ My/MariaDB
__ Oracle
__ Excel
__ Other (please specify)
My backend data of choice for MBSS has been MySQL, and then MariaDB
since it forked off from MySQL. Corpo
You may also consider creating another new account to test everything.
Good luck! ;)
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Kurt @ VR-FX wrote:
> Nope re/retent - newly sent also don't show up.
> Am sure acct settings R fine - but will Chk tonight!
> Thx,
--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/
Nope re/retent - newly sent also don't show up.
Am sure acct settings R fine - but will Chk tonight!
Thx,
-K-
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 29, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Man-wai Chang wrote:
>
> Were those messages marked expired and got deleted automatically?
> Check account and server settings (Ret
Were those messages marked expired and got deleted automatically?
Check account and server settings (Retention Policy)!
Or were they saved in a different Sent folder? Again, check account
and server settings.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> Hate to pull this TOO Far off top
I even did some research
on Google - but, could not seem to find a real answer to my problem.
Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst
Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Vince
Teachout
Se
On 10/28/2016 9:54 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
M$SQL 2012
VFP Databases
SQLite
How do you like SQLite, Dave? I've downloaded it and planning to start
playing with it so I can start Android programming.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscri
>> I don't see SQLite mentioned much.
> Single user and insecure so that kind of limits real-world usage to
phone applications and similar local storage use cases, as far as I can
see. You wouldn't be putting a big production database on it.
The following from the SQLite email list. Sent from t
On 10/28/2016 9:00 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
So, where's your data stored today?
MS Sql, followed by DBF
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://ma
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016, at 04:20 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
> I don't see SQLite mentioned much.
Single user and insecure so that kind of limits real-world usage to
phone applications and similar local storage use cases, as far as I can
see. You wouldn't be putting a big production database on it.
--
Rush??? I suspect, however, you meant that kind of 'tongue in cheek'.
Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst
Tel. +1-212-747-9100
www.GlobeTax.com
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Peter
Cushing
Sent: Friday, Octobe
xTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 9:01 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Friday Poll (while dl'ing MS Flash Patch)
So, where's your data stored today?
__ DBFs
__ MS SQL Server
__ Azure
__ Postgres
__ My/MariaDB
__ Oracle
__
Ted,
We use it to interface onto the Android tablets as it is obviously Android
Native.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: 28 October 2016 16:20
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Friday Poll (while dl'ing MS Flash
__ DBFs 80% clients
__ MS SQL Server 20% clients
Jose Enrique Llopis
www.multilinkcrm.com
-Mensaje original-
De: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] En nombre de Ted Roche
Enviado el: viernes, 28 de octubre de 2016 15:01
Para: profox@leafe.com
Asunto: Friday Poll (while
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
> M$SQL 2012
> VFP Databases
> SQLite
>
> Dave
>
I don't see SQLite mentioned much. I've worked with it in a couple of
situations (including a book by Whil Hentzen I edited) but haven't
used it in a production system.
_
On 28/10/2016 14:00, Ted Roche wrote:
So, where's your data stored today?
__ DBFs
Yup - sooner or later we will look to move to SQL but we don't want to
rush into things
Peter
This communication is intended for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. The contents are confidentia
On 10/28/2016 06:00 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
So, where's your data stored today?
X_ DBFs
__ MS SQL Server
__ Azure
__ Postgres
__ My/MariaDB
__ Oracle
__ Excel
__ Other (please specify)
(P.S. Microsoft released an out-of-band (i.e., emergency) patch for
Adobe Flash. You likely want to pat
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
