. But, it does A LOT So far!
So, I'm still plugging away at it...
L8r,
-K-
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Frank
Cazabon
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 7:58 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Screen Hacking a Problem...
Hey
On 1/24/2013 3:26 PM, Kurt wrote:
Hey Frank - I gotta agree - I find Screens easier to maintain as well.
As for SCX's being slower than PRG's - and someone followed up with some
Stats - I think those stat's are old. I only say that - because computers
are SO Much faster these days - that I
fun?!?!?
:-)
-K-
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of MB
Software Solutions, LLC
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 3:45 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Screen Hacking a Problem...
On 1/24/2013 3:26 PM, Kurt wrote:
Hey Frank - I
Thanks for the details Dan. I expected it to be faster. Would be
interesting to see more recent figures although I don't expect them to
be that much different.
I use the Document View when in forms and visual classes and find
getting around for code maintenance pretty easy. But, it is
Hey Dan,
I would think that harder to maintain is very subjective as I find
them much much much easier to maintain than PRGs.
Do you have some statistics to backup your assertion that running an SCX
is slower than a PRG (I have no doubt it is, but I'd like to see by how
much).
Thanks
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013, at 12:58 PM, Frank Cazabon wrote:
Hey Dan,
I would think that harder to maintain is very subjective as I find
them much much much easier to maintain than PRGs.
PRGs work better with source control though.
___
Post
If you're dealing with @GET/SAY stuff then a re-write is probably in
order. Can you actually segregate the screen stuff from the I/O stuff
and business logic? (we used to make toxic program soup in the old days!).
If so then I would suggest a staged approach:
1) separate (but don't change) a)
I guess so, but to be honest I do not have a problem with source control
either, the screen gets generated as a text file if I need to compare
things and it's all done invisibly to me.
Frank.
Frank Cazabon
On 17/01/2013 09:10 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:
PRGs work better with source control
On 01/17/13 04:58 AM, Frank Cazabon wrote:
Hey Dan,
I would think that harder to maintain is very subjective as I find
them much much much easier to maintain than PRGs.
Do you have some statistics to backup your assertion that running an SCX
is slower than a PRG (I have no doubt it is, but I'd
Kurt wrote on 2013-01-16:
I found this tool on the VFP ProFox downloads page called CLUE. The
description mentions:
Class Library Utility Extension - A tool I started back in '95 with Tom
Rettig. Never got around to incorporating Tom's prg2vcx into it.
I actually downloaded CLUE
Wow - that truly is a Wild Arse Guess. Not that I don't appreciate the
feedback - since I definitely do.
When I open the Form - and run it - is that what you would consider
Compiled? AFAIK - the only compiling was generation of like an APP or an
EXE file. So, just not sure what you mean.
Again
Kurt k...@isssusa.com wrote:
Wow - that truly is a Wild Arse Guess. Not that I don't appreciate the
feedback - since I definitely do.
When I open the Form - and run it - is that what you would consider
Compiled? AFAIK - the only compiling was generation of like an APP or
an
EXE file. So, just
Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Tracy
Pearson
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 1:46 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Screen Hacking a Problem...
Kurt k...@isssusa.com wrote:
Wow - that truly is a Wild Arse Guess. Not that I don't appreciate
programmatically see if that has ANY affect...
-K-
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted
Roche
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 2:04 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Screen Hacking a Problem...
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Kurt k
Kurt,
I am not Tracy, but what was meant was to run this command:
Compile Form filename.scx
Frank.
Frank Cazabon
On 16/01/2013 03:28 PM, Kurt wrote:
Also, still not sure what you meant about ... why I suggested the command
that would compile the form. What command is that exactly (as
Wow - Ted - Ur like a programming GOD! Since - in fact Ur WAG WORKED! I
guess that wasn't as Wild as you thought it would be!!!
Thank you SO MUCH - I'm Thrilled to have this working. Now I can start
making a LOT more progress on this special utlity - now that I have the
basic version working.
: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Frank
Cazabon
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 2:36 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Screen Hacking a Problem...
Kurt,
I am not Tracy, but what was meant was to run this command:
Compile Form filename.scx
Frank.
Frank Cazabon
Kurt wrote on 2013-01-16:
At this point - I'm just trying to create a screen - and not actually
build
an EXE. Even the screen only has the single label on it.
As for an Edit fixing it - its not just Any edit. Only the Edit of the
Properties within the SCX when having it open as a DBF.
consider it for
the uploads section...
-K-
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Tracy
Pearson
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 3:02 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Screen Hacking a Problem...
Kurt wrote on 2013-01-16
Swap the order of the Caption and the DoCreate properties in the Properties
memo field of the form.
Christof
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
On 01/16/13 12:09 PM, Kurt wrote:
When I began working on this - I thought it might end up being a cool
utility to allow other people to convert PRG's into Screens/Forms. Although,
after starting to work on it - I figured it may not work for everyone. The
PRG's in our system - generally define a
: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 4:18 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Screen Hacking a Problem...
On 01/16/13 12:09 PM, Kurt wrote:
When I began working on this - I thought it might end up being a cool
utility to allow other people to convert PRG's into Screens/Forms.
Although,
after starting
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Kurt k...@isssusa.com wrote:
Wow - Ted - Ur like a programming GOD! Since - in fact Ur WAG WORKED! I
Nah. If I can see further than some, it's because I stand on the shoulders
of giants, to paraphrase Newton.
guess that wasn't as Wild as you thought it
Thanks again Ted - and, yes, I shall keep that in mind about the Compile
once I get further along...
-K-
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted
Roche
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 4:29 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Screen
24 matches
Mail list logo
