notice. Or maybe care.
Al
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Ricardo Aráoz
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:33 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] more secure or less threats?
Allen wrote:
Maybe paranoid
I find that unlikely. It seems rather draconian and a little
'conspiracy-like'
-Original Message-
From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf
Of Allen
Sent: Friday, 17 April 2009 5:56 PM
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [NF] more secure or less threats?
I
...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Geoff Flight
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 10:58 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [NF] more secure or less threats?
I find that unlikely. It seems rather draconian and a little
'conspiracy-like
Geoff Flight wrote:
I find that unlikely. It seems rather draconian and a little
'conspiracy-like'
Hi Geoff!
It does seem that way, but actually, every now and then there are those
within the government who have a them (citizens) vs us (saviors)
mentality. The recent Janet Napolitano memo is
Pete Theisen wrote:
Geoff Flight wrote:
I find that unlikely. It seems rather draconian and a little
'conspiracy-like'
Hi Geoff!
It does seem that way, but actually, every now and then there are those
within the government who have a them (citizens) vs us (saviors)
mentality. The
Maybe paranoid people should not go online then.
Al
-Original Message-
Did you read my post? MS and NSA have had and currently have clear and
easy access to anything in your W$ machine. That is meant to be this way
and it is NOT changing at all.
Apr 16, 2009 04:49:11 AM, profox@leafe.com wrote:Maybe paranoid people should
not go online then.Al --Or maybe naive people shouldn't be
allowed to be computer professionals?(dang, that'd knock out all those MS
certified-blah-blah pretty fast,
Allen wrote:
Maybe paranoid people should not go online then.
Al
I happen to know a former MS partner (encryption area) who told me his
source code had to be sent first to n s a which returned the compiled
code to be included in W$. We can only guess what they did to the code.
Maybe
Paaa, badabadabadabadaammm!!!
And now! The MicroShit add of the day, folks!
I have Vista and find no trouble taking it between different clients
and working with their networks.
Are you forcing it to act like Win2000 ?
___
Post Messages
Gil Hale RR wrote:
very core of the OS, as opposed to the Windows bolt-on, add apps, based
security solution afterthought. I still do not trust security on my
Windows machines, despite all the protections I have in place, as I know
something can still sneak into my machinery if I am careless
2009/4/15 Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com:
Gil Hale RR wrote:
very core of the OS, as opposed to the Windows bolt-on, add apps, based
security solution afterthought. I still do not trust security on my
Windows machines, despite all the protections I have in place, as I know
something can
On Wed, April 15, 2009 10:25 am, Stephen Russell wrote:
So why upgrade to each new version put out? You get a better OS to
protect you.
Unfortunate that important point is lost on this group. Oh well.
You paint with too wide of a brush. That's not accurate at all. It might
be lost of
Stephen Russell wrote:
2009/4/15 Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com:
Gil Hale RR wrote:
very core of the OS, as opposed to the Windows bolt-on, add apps, based
security solution afterthought. I still do not trust security on my
Windows machines, despite all the protections I have in
http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=4146tag=nl.e539
Secure is a mindset, and not an actual state, right?
Things change in the industry as well as new threats detected. How
fast the vendors ;- roll with those threats.
--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
Web and Windows
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-
boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 9:48 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: [NF] more secure or less threats?
http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=4146tag=nl.e539
BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Gil Hale RR mrgmh...@rochester.rr.com
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:10:24
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: [NF] more secure or less threats?
I suppose that if I ran all the protections within Vista made available,
and hung my AntiVirus/AntiMalware/AntiAnti
...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] more secure or less threats?
If you really want to make your computer secure, just unplug that black
cable that runs from the wall outlet to your power supply on your pc. I
am fairly certain that that would make it nearly impossible for your pc
to become
In the pre-Internet days I had a client who would unplug his modem between
PCAnywhere sessions.
--- On Tue, 4/14/09, m...@mikewohlrab.com m...@mikewohlrab.com wrote:
From: m...@mikewohlrab.com m...@mikewohlrab.com
Subject: Re: [NF] more secure or less threats?
To: profox@leafe.com
Date
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Gil Hale RR mrgmh...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
I suppose that if I ran all the protections within Vista made available,
and hung my AntiVirus/AntiMalware/AntiAnti apps onto the machine, along with
both a hardware and software firewall that really tightened things
secure or less threats?
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Gil Hale RR
mrgmh...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
I suppose that if I ran all the protections within Vista made
available,
and hung my AntiVirus/AntiMalware/AntiAnti apps onto the machine,
along with
both a hardware and software firewall
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Gil Hale RR mrgmh...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
I am not forcing Vista to do anything. It is the other way around.
Is there an AD or is it all a peer network?
--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
Web and Windows
: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-
boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 3:08 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] more secure or less threats?
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Gil Hale RR
mrgmh...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
I am
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Gil Hale RR mrgmh...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
but with the Web Craze that has become so prevalent even that is beginning
to diminish.
--
You think that companies are retreating from the web?
Now that is a funny statement.
--
Stephen
...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 3:29 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] more secure or less threats?
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Gil Hale RR
mrgmh...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
but with the Web Craze that has become so prevalent even
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Gil Hale RR mrgmh...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
Read a little less aggressively. even that refers to internal File
Servers being used at my client locations, where the manufacturers they deal
with are moving deeper into web based solutions.
, 2009 3:40 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] more secure or less threats?
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Gil Hale RR
mrgmh...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
Read a little less aggressively. even that refers to internal File
Servers being used at my client locations, where
26 matches
Mail list logo
