Malcolm,
I agree entirely. The content of Foxtalk began falling some time ago with
the result that it just wasn't worth continuing the subscription - at which
stage I didn't renew.
On the other hand, Advisor, which seemed to be in the doldrums up until
earlier this year seems to be undergoing a
On Nov 1, 2006, at 8:09 AM, Malcolm Greene wrote:
Just received my November issue of FoxPro Advisor. Great issue jammed
with interesting articles and lots of color. I would rate this
issue an
A or A+.
I think going to bi-monthly is a great idea. It's great to see a lot
of content again!
Ed Leafe wrote:
On Nov 1, 2006, at 8:09 AM, Malcolm Greene wrote:
Just received my November issue of FoxPro Advisor. Great issue jammed
with interesting articles and lots of color. I would rate this issue an
A or A+.
I think going to bi-monthly is a great idea. It's great to see a
lot
Ed Leafe wrote:
I wouldn't do business with that company solely on the basis of
their deceptive subscription practices. It's not like FoxTalk is the
only source of knowledge, and I strongly believe in not patronizing
businesses run by scum.
Apart from the sanitation, the medicine,
I agree with Ed.
The Foxtalk subscription is pure P.I.T.A. I get letters addressed from
Washington, D.C. with no reference from Foxtalk, then I open it up and
it states my subscription is about to expire when it goes till next
JUNE '07 Then I get emails, then I get more letters with
On Nov 1, 2006, at 9:06 AM, Paul Newton wrote:
I wouldn't do business with that company solely on the basis
of their deceptive subscription practices. It's not like FoxTalk
is the only source of knowledge, and I strongly believe in not
patronizing businesses run by scum.
By hell,
Philip B wrote:
I agree with Ed.
The Foxtalk subscription is pure P.I.T.A. I get letters addressed from
Washington, D.C. with no reference from Foxtalk, then I open it up and
it states my subscription is about to expire when it goes till
next JUNE '07 Then I get emails, then I get
I wouldn't do business with that company solely on the basis of their
deceptive subscription practices
For the record, I'm talking about the content of these 2 publications -
not FoxTalk's subscription scams.
Malcolm
___
Post Messages to:
On Nov 1, 2006, at 11:20 AM, Malcolm Greene wrote:
I wouldn't do business with that company solely on the basis of
their deceptive subscription practices
For the record, I'm talking about the content of these 2
publications -
not FoxTalk's subscription scams.
IMO you can't separate the
Michael,
Let's hope Rick Schummer's advice to them helps them to change. I'll give
them the
benefit of the doubt that the crap still in the pipeline was in there prior to
Rick
speaking with them. ???
Just because I have offered them advice does not mean they are taking it bg.
There are
-869-0675
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Newton
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 7:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FoxTalk vs. FoxPro Advisor
Ed Leafe wrote:
On Nov 1, 2006, at 8:09 AM, Malcolm Greene wrote:
Just received
Actually Ed (sometimes) reminds me of a Madagain, but one on the lighter
side of the Force! LOL
JK Ed!
On 11/1/06, Paul Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ed Leafe wrote:
By hell, Ed, you must feel *very* strongly about this to use such
uncharacteristically intemperate language !
---
12 matches
Mail list logo
