I may not be remembering the actual version numbers for each SP. Go with what
your eyes show you.
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of MB Software
Solutions, LLC
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 3:46 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: So, about this VFPA thing
the common files location buried under program
files.
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of MB Software
Solutions, LLC
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 3:39 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: So, about this VFPA thing...
This is strange. I downloaded this and ran
27, 2020 3:39 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: So, about this VFPA thing...
This is strange. I downloaded this and ran it but VFP still says .2412. ???
https://github.com/VFPX/VFPRuntimeInstallers/blob/master/VFP9SP2RT.exe
On 1/27/2020 3:32 PM, Richard Kaye wrote:
> Yes, you h
...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: So, about this VFPA thing...
So I got a new Win10 Pro laptop at the Corporate gig and installed VFP9 on it.
It was NOT patched...so the version is Visual FoxPro
09.00..2412 for Windows.
I downloaded the VFPA 32 bit from (a) below and when I go to run it, it fails
: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of MB Software
Solutions, LLC
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 3:20 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: So, about this VFPA thing...
So I got a new Win10 Pro laptop at the Corporate gig and installed VFP9 on it.
It was NOT patched...so the version is Visual FoxPro
So I got a new Win10 Pro laptop at the Corporate gig and installed VFP9
on it. It was NOT patched...so the version is Visual FoxPro
09.00..2412 for Windows.
I downloaded the VFPA 32 bit from (a) below and when I go to run it, it
fails with this error:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 1:42 PM Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> Newbie! I started with dBASE II version 2.02 which was
> apparently the very first version.
>
Amateurs. I debugging WANG's Key File Access Method (branded ISAM) before
Intel had invented the 8008. And that was my fourth computer
At 08:07 2019-11-26, Koen Piller wrote:
OK alright. My first impression on Alan's remark was a negative, meaning
negative in the sense of the product, like this product is a hack, it is no
good to use. Now meanwhile I have looked around and found on Wiki an
explication of 'hack' :* Hacking is
Agreed 1000% that using local data for reporting is fastest in VFP apps,
for sure. I had written some code awhile (back but didn't yet finish)
that would pull data locally if the checksum of the MariaDB table had
changed, and then I'd using the max(timestamp) field on the local VFP
table to
For me, I've done kind of the opposite. In other words, I'll connect to a
SQL DB, Postgres, Oracle, whatever, download the whole database to VFP,
read info from the information_schema stuff, recreate indexes, etc. Then
work with the data in the local VFP DB for analysis and so forth.
So it's not
> Ever since I switched to MySQL (and later MariaDB) back in 2004, I've
> never wanted to go back to DBFs for major app tables. Never.
>
+1
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
On 11/27/2019 3:47 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019, at 6:51 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote:
Charlie,
To respond to your wish for larger DBF capacities.
There's also Advantage Database Server (now owned by SAP) which lets you work
with DBF\CDX\FPT over 4GB.
Ever since I switched to
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019, at 6:51 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote:
> Charlie,
>
> To respond to your wish for larger DBF capacities.
There's also Advantage Database Server (now owned by SAP) which lets you work
with DBF\CDX\FPT over 4GB.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
given permission to work with VFPA at the
office yet.
Tracy
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Charlie
Coleman
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 12:33 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: So, about this VFPA thing...
Technically, what
On 11/26/2019 12:32 PM, Charlie Coleman wrote:
Technically, what VPA is doing is actually not intended by its owner, MS.
...which is why I was surprised M$ did nothing to stop it.
Anyway, it is definitely interesting enough that I plan on working with it.
I would love larger DBF capacities
Technically, what VPA is doing is actually not intended by its owner, MS.
So I think the term hack does apply. If it were an open source tool, then I
would say it would not be a hack. Like others have said, the work 'hack'
draws out negative connotations (for us developers). But consider other
Think i started with foxbase
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 5:07 PM Koen Piller wrote:
> OK alright. My first impression on Alan's remark was a negative, meaning
> negative in the sense of the product, like this product is a hack, it is no
> good to use. Now meanwhile I have looked around and found on
OK alright. My first impression on Alan's remark was a negative, meaning
negative in the sense of the product, like this product is a hack, it is no
good to use. Now meanwhile I have looked around and found on Wiki an
explication of 'hack' :* Hacking is finding applications that are not
intended
On 11/26/2019 4:26 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019, at 5:39 PM, Koen Piller wrote:
*my motto of the day: *Those who insist that VFPA is a hacked version
of VFP9 have no knowledge of Visual FoxPro.
I've been working with FoxPro since 1991, so spare me your motto. This thing
alters
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019, at 5:39 PM, Koen Piller wrote:
> *my motto of the day: *Those who insist that VFPA is a hacked version
> of VFP9 have no knowledge of Visual FoxPro.
I've been working with FoxPro since 1991, so spare me your motto. This thing
alters the binaries, and is therefore a hack in
Interestingly enough, my AV product (VIPRE Business) takes out the URL
for VFPA as a known bad URL...
*Brant Layton*
*Principal Consultant*
*Digital Computing and Consulting, Inc.*
480.964.1316
On 11/25/2019 7:32 AM, profoxtech-requ...@leafe.com wrote:
RE: So, about this VFPA thing
t;
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: ProFox Im Auftrag von Alan Bourke
> Gesendet: Montag, 25. November 2019 15:32
> An: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Betreff: Re: So, about this VFPA thing...
>
> If you want to download a Chinese hacked version of Visual Foxpro, yep.
>
&g
I dont think one can call this a hacked version. I would call it an
enhanced version. Given the fact of all the bugs mr Chen corrected in
VFP9SP2
Koen
Op ma 25 nov. 2019 om 15:32 schreef Alan Bourke
> If you want to download a Chinese hacked version of Visual Foxpro, yep.
>
> --
> Alan Bourke
If you want to download a Chinese hacked version of Visual Foxpro, yep.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: https://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free
Yes that is one solution. You van also install VFPA in a separate
directory, not in the same as VFP9. One can than decide to construct the
pjx either in VFP9 or VFPA. Deployment of an exe built under VFPA: mr. Chen
published a document How-to-Do
Rgds
Koen
Op za 23 nov. 2019 om 12:32 schreef MB
Just to be clear: There are TWO versions of VFPA ("A" like the Hex notation
of "10")
a) the patched version of your existing VFP9 installation. This implies that
it's stil a 23Bit version.
This is the version you most probably want to use immediately.
Download the 32Bit on the bottom of:
So do we just keep developing as we were but put the VFPA runtime files
in place (and deploy them to client sites)? No real change for our
development?
On 11/22/2019 11:08 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote:
Yes, that is the right site.
Happy Coding!
Tracy
On November 22, 2019 10:42:56 PM EST, Vince
Yes, that is the right site.
Happy Coding!
Tracy
On November 22, 2019 10:42:56 PM EST, Vince Teachout wrote:
>Apparently, I've been under a rock, and there's a magically enhanced
>VFP9 SP2 that fixes some bugs, can run concurrently with vfp9, and
>supports 64 bits.
>
>Before I download
28 matches
Mail list logo
