This fix was helpful but unfortunately means that developers are more
likely to introduce bugs unless they run
make clean; make check
before committing. E.g., I have just tried to make a pre-release but I
now get the error
In toplevel form:
coq/coq.el:1040:67:Error: reference to free var
Dear PG Devs,
Some time ago I mooted moving from our clunky University-hosted CVS+trac
to Github. I think it would allow people to more easily make
modifications and propose small patches. And it looks as if the Github
issue tracking system is now reasonable enough to use that we can move
t
No objection!
Pierre
2013/7/4 David Aspinall
> Dear PG Devs,
>
> Some time ago I mooted moving from our clunky University-hosted CVS+trac
> to Github. I think it would allow people to more easily make modifications
> and propose small patches. And it looks as if the Github issue tracking
> sy
2013/7/4 David Aspinall
> introduce
No it is mine. Sorry I will look at it. this is my recent attempt at
reading coq project files as described in coq documentation.
P.
___
ProofGeneral-devel mailing list
ProofGeneral-devel@inf.ed.ac.uk
http://lists
David Aspinall writes:
This fix was helpful but unfortunately means that developers are more
likely to introduce bugs unless they run
make clean; make check
I agree. But even before the change we had now and then
compilation errors in the repository.
>From my point of view the com
On 04/07/13 12:21, Hendrik Tews wrote:
If you think these compilation errors are an issue, I volunteer
to implement one or both suggestions.
Thanks indeed! I think an automatic build would definitely be nice to
have if you have inclination/interest. Recently I found about Travis
https://tr
Fixed. There was also a problem with m4pg, also fixed at coq.el:2204.
P.
2013/7/4 Pierre Courtieu
>
> 2013/7/4 David Aspinall
>
>> introduce
>
>
>
> No it is mine. Sorry I will look at it. this is my recent attempt at
> reading coq project files as described in coq documentation.
>
> P.
>
Hi,
I am happy to see Pierre you back on this list and back
committing to Proof General.
Regarding the 4.3 release: There are some indentation bugs in the
tracker. Pierre, could you spend some time for them?
I intend to fix #467 and have a look at #460.
Does anybody else use the new parallel c
Hendrik Tews writes:
Regarding the 4.3 release: ...
I have another issue that I would like to see resolved in 4.3:
The feature name conflict with Coq, see
http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/pipermail/proofgeneral-devel/2012/000241.html
Both Proof General and Coq install coq.el (and some other files
