; )
And don't forget those that think in Hex, or even worse, Octal . . . (and
yes, I still own and use an HP16C).
- Original Message -
From: Tim Hutcheson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: peda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 8:15 AM
Subject: [PEDA] Best settings for polygon fill
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 5:10 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Cc: JaMi Smith
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Best settings for polygon fill on signal layer?
Tim,
One thing that was not discussed tha tyou may or may not know about, and
which may be helpful to you is the issue of spacing of your Polygon
Hello all,
I'm finalizing my PCB for first proto. Its a 4-layer board w/o internal
planes but uses signal layer polygon fill on each layer for the GND, SGND,
+15, -15 planes. My question today is: What considerations need to be made
when selecting the polygon fill parameters, relative to the
]]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 8:16 AM
To: peda
Subject: [PEDA] Best settings for polygon fill on signal layer?
Hello all,
I'm finalizing my PCB for first proto. Its a 4-layer board
w/o internal
planes but uses signal layer polygon fill on each layer for
the GND, SGND,
+15, -15
settings for polygon fill on signal layer?
Hello all,
I'm finalizing my PCB for first proto. Its a 4-layer board
w/o internal
planes but uses signal layer polygon fill on each layer for
the GND, SGND,
+15, -15 planes. My question today is: What considerations
need to be made
when
: [PEDA] Best settings for polygon fill on signal layer?
Tim,
first my observations. I have always found that 45 degree polygons
are a lot slower than 90 degree polygons at repouring. Since yours is
completely filled I don't see where 45 degree is doing anything for you.
Second, rather than
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Best settings for polygon fill on signal layer?
what about the question of octagon vs arcs on the pours?
we use the arcs (without notable problems) for whatever that is worth
they look nice anyway
Dennis Saputelli
