Re: [PEDA] Pulsonix vs Protel vs Protel Pheonix

2002-02-13 Thread Andrew Jenkins

Re: [PEDA] Pulsonix vs Protel vs Protel Pheonix

2002-02-13 Thread HxEngr

Re: [PEDA] Pulsonix vs Protel vs Protel Pheonix

2002-02-13 Thread John Williams
Andrew Jenkins wrote: That said, I did spend an hour with the Pulsonix demo. I found one issue, as Protel would call it, immediately. In the PCB editor, the Z key zooms in on current cursor. Well enough, how do I zoom out? The View Menu indicates that O would be the hotkey. But O pops up

Re: [PEDA] Pulsonix vs Protel vs Protel Pheonix

2002-02-13 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 06:35 AM 2/13/2002 -0500, Andrew Jenkins wrote: [re Pulsonix zoom:] Use the mouse wheel. Simple enough, and seamless. Holding the mouse wheel in allows panning. Seamless again. My point was that the menu was wrong. But I had not noticed the wheel behavior. Very nice, Protel take note.

Re: [PEDA] Pulsonix vs Protel vs Protel Pheonix

2002-02-13 Thread Dennis Saputelli
although i am habituated to the PgUp PgDn keys for zoom i think they were VERY BAD default choices whenever the focus is not on the graphical screen but on maybe a list box, the PgUp PgDn keys act as they would in most programs and move up/down the list, this drives me crazy in lib edit when i

Re: [PEDA] Pulsonix vs Protel vs Protel Pheonix

2002-02-12 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 09:54 PM 2/11/2002 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am about to purchase a new EDA. Just evaluated Pulsonix,looks good.Should I wait for the new Protel release with the Sirus autorouter or go ahead with pulsonix? Anybody tested the Protel beta and how do you rate it. Hate the learning curve

Re: [PEDA] Pulsonix vs Protel vs Protel Pheonix

2002-02-12 Thread Tony Karavidas
PM To: Protel EDA Forum Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PEDA] Pulsonix vs Protel vs Protel Pheonix At 09:54 PM 2/11/2002 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am about to purchase a new EDA. Just evaluated Pulsonix,looks good.Should I wait for the new Protel release with the Sirus

Re: [PEDA] Pulsonix vs Protel vs Protel Pheonix

2002-02-12 Thread Terry Harris
On Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:56:07 -0500, you wrote: I can't say anything about Pulsonix. Until this post, I hadn't heard of it, which might say something by itself. I had never heard of them either till I saw a usenet post today. You won't find any clue on their web site but if you search for

Re: [PEDA] Pulsonix vs Protel vs Protel Pheonix

2002-02-12 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 12:32 AM 2/13/2002 +, Terry Harris wrote: It will be interesting to see the demo Well I doubt it will be bad, I hope it will be good - the more competition the better as far as I am concerned. First of all, it should be mentioned that for a person familiar with one CAD system to test a

Re: [PEDA] Pulsonix vs Protel vs Protel Pheonix

2002-02-12 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 03:54 PM 2/12/2002 -0800, Tony Karavidas wrote: NDA doesn't mean you can't say it doesn't exist. You just can't talk about it. If it did exist and I had it I could say I'm beta testing IT right now (Which I'm not) :) The NDA, if one has signed it, covers all disclosures of confidential