Re: [PEDA] Protel vs. DirectCD

2002-08-27 Thread Brian Guralnick
Yes, this was mentioned in one of my earlier posts, though, it was met with a healthy dose of skepticism. I did recommend for everyone to un-install anything Roxio related and completely switch over to Ahead's Nero CD writer software drivers for the best system stability. You could

Re: [PEDA] Protel vs. DirectCD

2002-08-27 Thread mariusrf
if you Google rec.video.desktop you will see the vast majority of people had problems with roxio and switched to ahead nero for cd burning . directcd and easy cd creator historically had tons of issues with the most diverse pc configurations . Matt Tudor , MSEE

Re: [PEDA] Protel vs. DirectCD

2002-08-27 Thread Tim Hutcheson
USA 805-202-4461 -Original Message- From: Brian Guralnick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:21 AM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel vs. DirectCD Yes, this was mentioned in one of my earlier posts, though, it was met with a healthy dose

Re: [PEDA] Protel vs. DirectCD

2002-08-27 Thread Matt Daggett
Warning Unable to process data: multipart/mixed; boundary==_NextPartTM-000-ac776102-da2a-4864-a5f7-07a326223649

Re: [PEDA] Protel vs. DirectCD

2002-08-27 Thread Dennis Saputelli
it works for me (new roxio) i have had far less coasters w/ roxio than nero and i find it much easier to use but i usually close all other apps while burning and don't do other tasks at the same time Dennis Saputelli mariusrf wrote: if you Google rec.video.desktop you will see the vast

Re: [PEDA] Protel vs. DirectCD

2002-08-27 Thread Brad Velander
-Original Message- From: Tim Hutcheson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 9:53 AM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel vs. DirectCD Ahead's Nero Burning ROM is absolutely the best. Hand's down. No question. I bought a new drive just to avoid

Re: [PEDA] Protel vs. DirectCD

2002-08-27 Thread Joel Hammer
] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:20 AM Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel vs. DirectCD Yes, this was mentioned in one of my earlier posts, though, it was met with a healthy dose of skepticism. I did recommend for everyone to un-install anything Roxio related and completely switch over to Ahead's Nero

Re: [PEDA] Protel vs. DirectCD

2002-08-27 Thread Matt Daggett
Warning Unable to process data: multipart/mixed; boundary==_NextPartTM-000-d393a868-351b-4120-926f-3c8d2957d2c2

Re: [PEDA] Protel vs. DirectCD

2002-08-27 Thread Tony Karavidas
PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 10:47 AM To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] Protel vs. DirectCD You should invest in SCSI I/O if you have a lot of throughput problems to cause buffer underruns. I can defrag a partition while burning from the other without underrun issues