Ian,
All I can say is that if you haven't seen how some
people use the underscoring, it doesn't mean that it
doesn't exist. It's just a matter of time.
FYI designers here use very often undescore to make a
difference between two signals, not to make one of
them negative. RESET and RESET_ are just
Richard,
That is a good idea but unfortunately the printouts
are blackwhite.
Mira
- Richard Sumner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mira,
I changed the default wire color so there is a good
contrast between the
wire and the net labels. The underscore no longer
disappears into the wire!
For
At 06:05 AM 6/6/2002 -0700, Mira wrote:
I just tried to debugg a board, which schematic was in
Protel and the net names were RESET and RESET_. [...]
Due to the way the net labels are attached to the wire
in Protel, the underscore overlaps the wire and hardly
could be seen. That was what I meant.
Abd,
I found out that there are as many opinions about
negation as the people are.
I just tried to debugg a board, which schematic was in
Protel and the net names were RESET and RESET_. Do
figure which one where is connected if you have it
only on paper.
Due to the way the net labels are
On 06:05 AM 6/06/2002 -0700, Mira said:
Abd,
I found out that there are as many opinions about
negation as the people are.
I just tried to debugg a board, which schematic was in
Protel and the net names were RESET and RESET_. Do
figure which one where is connected if you have it
only on paper.
:
Thema: Re: [PEDA] negation
character redux
04.06.2002 18:35
Bitte antworten
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] negation character redux
I know this has been widely discussed but
...
re:
pin naming on schematic symbols and the
negation
character
Abd,
Net_names like this look awful on the schematic and
the printouts. Not recognizable at all.
Mira
--- Abd ulRahman Lomax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:02 AM 6/4/2002 -0700, Bruce Walter wrote:
Anybody know if there would be a problem using a
dash (minus sign) as a
prefix?
I think it
Subject: Re: [PEDA] negation character redux
Abd,
Net_names like this look awful on the schematic and
the printouts. Not recognizable at all.
Mira
--- Abd ulRahman Lomax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:02 AM 6/4/2002 -0700, Bruce Walter wrote:
Anybody know if there would be a problem using a
dash
10:58 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] negation character redux
I know this has been widely discussed but ...
re:
pin naming on schematic symbols and the negation
character thereof
what was the consensus, or was there?
i know the bar symbol is problematic and i have
www.emdesigns.com
www.emmanufacturing.com
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Saputelli
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] negation character redux
I know this has been widely discussed but ...
re
501
www.gerhardeng.com
www.emdesigns.com
www.emmanufacturing.com
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Saputelli
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] negation character redux
I know
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Saputelli
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] negation character redux
I know this has been widely discussed but ...
re:
pin naming on schematic symbols
www.emmanufacturing.com
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Saputelli
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] negation character redux
I know this has been widely discussed but ...
re
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Saputelli
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] negation character redux
I know this has been widely discussed but ...
re:
pin naming
Anybody know if there would be a problem using a dash (minus sign) as a
prefix?
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Saputelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:28 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] negation character redux
We use \. In PCAD you can type
At 11:02 AM 6/4/2002 -0700, Bruce Walter wrote:
Anybody know if there would be a problem using a dash (minus sign) as a
prefix?
I think it works, but as another mentioned, WR will be sorted in a
different place than -WR.
Personally, I use an asterisk at the end, not because it is necessarily
On 06:09 PM 3/06/2002 -0700, Cliff Gerhard said:
We use a # after the signal name ala the PCI specification (GNT#, REQ#,
etc.)
We use n_ as a prefix (for the reasons Joey gave - portability between tools).
I suspect there are at least as many opinions as designers on this one.
Ian Wilson
* *
I know this has been widely discussed but ...
re:
pin naming on schematic symbols and the negation character thereof
what was the consensus, or was there?
i know the bar symbol is problematic and i have decided to never use it
again
i recall someone advocating the use of n as in nRW
that
Hi, Dennis;
I use, and have often seen used, the slash (/) for negation on
pin signal names as well as Net names. Seems to work OK.
eg: /OUTPUT for negative output.
Brian
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave
: Re: [PEDA] negation character redux
I know this has been widely discussed but ...
re:
pin naming on schematic symbols and the negation character thereof
what was the consensus, or was there?
i know the bar symbol is problematic and i have decided to never use it
again
i recall someone
: [PEDA] negation character redux
I know this has been widely discussed but ...
re:
pin naming on schematic symbols and the negation character thereof
what was the consensus, or was there?
i know the bar symbol is problematic and i have decided to never use it
again
i recall
22 matches
Mail list logo
