Re: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion

2001-08-16 Thread Steve Fallon

All,

If someone can send me the Alegro file format I will modify my CadSTAR 
converter to also convert Alegro in to Protel.

Rgds Steve F


From: Jim McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 14:47:27 -0700

Bob,

I don't know what Allegro goes for but the converter I researched was
$11,400 to go both ways. Ouch!

Jim McGrath
CAD Connections Inc.

Bob Jones wrote:

  Hi Jim,
  I guess nobody cares about your Allegro problems
  What's cheaper the converter or Allegro?
 
  Bob Jones
  Digitized Technologies
  2 Summit Road
  P.O.Box 7284
  Prospect, CT. 06712-1541
  Tel: 203-758-6312
  Fax: 203-758-3338
  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Notice:  This message is intended solely for the person to whom it
  is addressed.  Unintended recipients will be legally responsible for
  unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or distribution.  If you have
  received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately
  by replying to this message.  Then delete this message from your
  system.  Thank you.
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Jim McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 1:37 PM
  Subject: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion
 
   Hi All,
  
   I have a request from a customer to take in their Alegro PCB files and
   modify/finish work that has been started in house. I am aware of
   Router Solutions but have been told it converts to 2.8. Does anybody
   have practical experience as to the completeness of the conversion
   and weaknesses/strengths of the conversion?
  
   Thanks,
  
   Jim McGrath
   CAD Connections, Inc.
  


_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*  - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion

2001-08-16 Thread Jim McGrath

Hi All,

Thanks for all the responses.
Colin what did your contractor charge for the conversion?
Please let me know if the back to Protel conversion goes as well as
the to Allegro conversion.
Also RSI's web site says it handles Protel 2.8,V3 and V4 it's just hard
to justify the price.


Regards,
Jim McGrath
CAD Connections, Inc.

Colin Weber wrote:

 I have used the extract command of Allegro and it works well. From memory,
 It has
 more options than just the text interface it present the user with. You can
 drive it
 without the interface. I found converting the data it presented (using AWK
 at the time)
 still took some time to do. The way libraries are managed presented problems.
 This may be something to be aware of when wanting to match libraries in Protel,
 if using this method.

 The contractor I had translate a Protel PCB into Veribest/Mentor using the
 RSI tool
 said the conversion from Protel went well and had little rework to make the
 translation
 complete. However, going back to Protel is where he was skeptical and hasn't as
 yet tried. If you'd like I'll keep you posted when he gets around to trying
 this.

 I have also realised that at the time of posting my last email you would be
 using
 a late version of Cadence as the older ones had Y2K issues.

 At 05:31 PM 15/08/2001 -0400, you wrote:
 The problem may not be just limited to protel ascii 2.8 limitations.
 
 There are a few homebrew options but some may seem more impractical than
 others
 
 
 5) purchase said package in (4) or get that company to provide you with
 following:
 
 there is an extract utility (I forget the name of itcds_extract???
 allegro_extract???) that comes with the Cadence tools that will directly
 read the binary brd file and give you a text file of the extracted
 primitives... A PERL script could make breakfast out of that and convert it
 to protel ascii
 
 the extract utility uses a text file to describe what kind of information to
 extract from the brd file and then generates said output text file...
 
 6) use router solutions inc.
 
 
 Allegro is super powerful while protel's UI is far superior and makes boards
 a joy
 -chris

 Regards,

 Colin Weber

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*  - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion

2001-08-16 Thread chris mackensen

The conversion back into allegro would be interesting on text file basis
I would write it into a clip file language format and then generate a script
(*.scr) file to put testpoints back in (if there are test points)  But
other than that, since it has been a while since I have touched allegro, and
am fuzzy on its other back door import capabilities (I suppose one could
bring it back in with a wire file or somesuch as seen from Specctra)...

-chris

-Original Message-
From: Jim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:29 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion


Hi All,

Thanks for all the responses.
Colin what did your contractor charge for the conversion?
Please let me know if the back to Protel conversion goes as well as
the to Allegro conversion.
Also RSI's web site says it handles Protel 2.8,V3 and V4 it's just hard
to justify the price.


Regards,
Jim McGrath
CAD Connections, Inc.

Colin Weber wrote:

 I have used the extract command of Allegro and it works well. From memory,
 It has
 more options than just the text interface it present the user with. You
can
 drive it
 without the interface. I found converting the data it presented (using AWK
 at the time)
 still took some time to do. The way libraries are managed presented
problems.
 This may be something to be aware of when wanting to match libraries in
Protel,
 if using this method.

 The contractor I had translate a Protel PCB into Veribest/Mentor using the
 RSI tool
 said the conversion from Protel went well and had little rework to make
the
 translation
 complete. However, going back to Protel is where he was skeptical and
hasn't as
 yet tried. If you'd like I'll keep you posted when he gets around to
trying
 this.

 I have also realised that at the time of posting my last email you would
be
 using
 a late version of Cadence as the older ones had Y2K issues.

 At 05:31 PM 15/08/2001 -0400, you wrote:
 The problem may not be just limited to protel ascii 2.8 limitations.
 
 There are a few homebrew options but some may seem more impractical than
 others
 
 
 5) purchase said package in (4) or get that company to provide you with
 following:
 
 there is an extract utility (I forget the name of itcds_extract???
 allegro_extract???) that comes with the Cadence tools that will directly
 read the binary brd file and give you a text file of the extracted
 primitives... A PERL script could make breakfast out of that and convert
it
 to protel ascii
 
 the extract utility uses a text file to describe what kind of information
to
 extract from the brd file and then generates said output text file...
 
 6) use router solutions inc.
 
 
 Allegro is super powerful while protel's UI is far superior and makes
boards
 a joy
 -chris

 Regards,

 Colin Weber

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*  - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion

2001-08-16 Thread Colin Weber

Not to be misled by my email I actually work in Australia, as does the 
contractor
who worked on this conversion. From memory the job was to bring Protel 
libraries
and netlist from Protel hierarchical schematics into Mentor Expedition 
(formally
Veribest) and place then route the design. The completed design was then to be
converted back into Protel. The forward translation went very well. We haven't
received the translation back into ProtelSE as yet.

The idea was to evaluate Veribest and it's router for our large designs. 
Protel just
seems to be taking us too long on these jobs for our time-to-market needs. The
design was mixed analog, digital and HV, and physically quite large. The 
original quote
for this job was around AUD$7.5k I think this crept up to $10k by the time 
we made
the usual last minute mods. Remember though, this was for the layout, route and
translation. The contractor quoted something in the order of $1 to 1.5k for the
translation component only.

Fortunately for us the contractor I used has the forward translator 
already. We used
his services to test this translator just as much as the Veribest package. 
He has to
purchase the backwards translator before we can go back.

It will probably be a couple of weeks before we translate back. I'll keep 
you posted.

At the end of the day I feel we are still best off doing our own layout. We 
didn't seem
to save any time with that. The routing still appears to be where the time 
can be
cut. I have evaluated Specctra as best able within Cadences eval. license. 
It certainly
appears to offer another solution and I dare say we'll try that next. If 
your reading this,
I haven't forgotten your services there Mike.


Regards,

Colin Weber
Varian Australia Pty Ltd



At 09:28 AM 16/08/2001 -0700, you wrote:
Hi All,

Thanks for all the responses.
Colin what did your contractor charge for the conversion?
Please let me know if the back to Protel conversion goes as well as
the to Allegro conversion.
Also RSI's web site says it handles Protel 2.8,V3 and V4 it's just hard
to justify the price.


Regards,
Jim McGrath
CAD Connections, Inc.

Colin Weber wrote:

  I have used the extract command of Allegro and it works well. From memory,
  It has
  more options than just the text interface it present the user with. You can
  drive it
  without the interface. I found converting the data it presented (using AWK
  at the time)
  still took some time to do. The way libraries are managed presented 
 problems.
  This may be something to be aware of when wanting to match libraries in 
 Protel,
  if using this method.
 
  The contractor I had translate a Protel PCB into Veribest/Mentor using the
  RSI tool
  said the conversion from Protel went well and had little rework to make the
  translation
  complete. However, going back to Protel is where he was skeptical and 
 hasn't as
  yet tried. If you'd like I'll keep you posted when he gets around to trying
  this.
 
  I have also realised that at the time of posting my last email you would be
  using
  a late version of Cadence as the older ones had Y2K issues.
 
  At 05:31 PM 15/08/2001 -0400, you wrote:
  The problem may not be just limited to protel ascii 2.8 limitations.
  
  There are a few homebrew options but some may seem more impractical than
  others
  
  
  5) purchase said package in (4) or get that company to provide you with
  following:
  
  there is an extract utility (I forget the name of itcds_extract???
  allegro_extract???) that comes with the Cadence tools that will directly
  read the binary brd file and give you a text file of the extracted
  primitives... A PERL script could make breakfast out of that and 
 convert it
  to protel ascii
  
  the extract utility uses a text file to describe what kind of 
 information to
  extract from the brd file and then generates said output text file...
  
  6) use router solutions inc.
  
  
  Allegro is super powerful while protel's UI is far superior and makes 
 boards
  a joy
  -chris
 
  Regards,
 
  Colin Weber

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*  - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion

2001-08-15 Thread Bob Jones

Hi Jim,
I guess nobody cares about your Allegro problems 
What's cheaper the converter or Allegro?

Bob Jones
Digitized Technologies
2 Summit Road
P.O.Box 7284
Prospect, CT. 06712-1541
Tel: 203-758-6312
Fax: 203-758-3338
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Notice:  This message is intended solely for the person to whom it
is addressed.  Unintended recipients will be legally responsible for
unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or distribution.  If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately
by replying to this message.  Then delete this message from your
system.  Thank you.


- Original Message - 
From: Jim McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 1:37 PM
Subject: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion


 Hi All,
 
 I have a request from a customer to take in their Alegro PCB files and
 modify/finish work that has been started in house. I am aware of
 Router Solutions but have been told it converts to 2.8. Does anybody
 have practical experience as to the completeness of the conversion
 and weaknesses/strengths of the conversion?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Jim McGrath
 CAD Connections, Inc.
 
 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*  - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion

2001-08-15 Thread chris mackensen

The problem may not be just limited to protel ascii 2.8 limitations.

There are a few homebrew options but some may seem more impractical than
others

1) get a clip file of the allegro board  write a clip file parser that
handles the recursive LISP like structure of clip language..
NOTE: clip files usually do not transfer test points (I had to learn that
one the hard way and write a PERL script to extract and offset multiple test
points into a clip'ed cut and paste multichannel board to fix that)...

2) export the board to CCT/Specctra router  (allegro v.13 and v.14 make this
easier in File menu)... export wires etc.  Also will need to export pick and
place and make sure origins are same between allegro lib and protel lib. (or
write quickie PERL *.dsn file LISP like parser into ASCII for protel)...
(the netlist info and primitive stuff is in there)

3) generate allegro artwork... import gerbers into protel... maybe use pick
and place as well... key here is that libraries have to match...
I dunno if the IPC netlisting features will help here or not... plus last I
knew Cadence's IPC netlister had a few bugs...
you can also use a netlist exported from a net_out in Allegro, but you will
need a converter (I used to have a protel-to-allegro netlist munger written
in PERL, but I can't find it... but it wouldn't be too hard to write one
going the other way in PERL) or you could do the munging with search and
replaces in Word or some such...

then maybe (re)generate/compare netlist from copper... perhaps you would
group pad primitives into components from the gerbers and make pick and
place library matching moot  (usually a *.dsn would have the primitive
boundaries in it)

4) I'm going from a couple of years ago memory... Don't quote me  Buy
Cadence's Design Studio (?)... it was on sale for a while (If I recall) for
$4k to $5k USD (much cheaper than protel)... from what I undertand, it
contains OrCad, Specctra (limited to 6 layers... at a time ;-), and
Allegro... I think it was supposed to be Cadence's answer to shrink wrapped
EDA software


There must be a conversion path from that to Protel (some more convenient
than others)... there may need to be some data massaging but since most of
cadence's things are text file based, it is easier especially with PERL and
knowing a good PERL programmer   If you have the Allegro *.brd file...
it should convert it to the necessary text as below...

5) purchase said package in (4) or get that company to provide you with
following:

there is an extract utility (I forget the name of itcds_extract???
allegro_extract???) that comes with the Cadence tools that will directly
read the binary brd file and give you a text file of the extracted
primitives... A PERL script could make breakfast out of that and convert it
to protel ascii

the extract utility uses a text file to describe what kind of information to
extract from the brd file and then generates said output text file...

6) use router solutions inc.


Allegro is super powerful while protel's UI is far superior and makes boards
a joy
-chris




-Original Message-
From: Jim McGrath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:47 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion


Bob,

I don't know what Allegro goes for but the converter I researched was
$11,400 to go both ways. Ouch!

Jim McGrath
CAD Connections Inc.

Bob Jones wrote:

 Hi Jim,
 I guess nobody cares about your Allegro problems
 What's cheaper the converter or Allegro?

 Bob Jones
 Digitized Technologies
 2 Summit Road
 P.O.Box 7284
 Prospect, CT. 06712-1541
 Tel: 203-758-6312
 Fax: 203-758-3338
 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Notice:  This message is intended solely for the person to whom it
 is addressed.  Unintended recipients will be legally responsible for
 unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or distribution.  If you have
 received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately
 by replying to this message.  Then delete this message from your
 system.  Thank you.

 - Original Message -
 From: Jim McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 1:37 PM
 Subject: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion

  Hi All,
 
  I have a request from a customer to take in their Alegro PCB files and
  modify/finish work that has been started in house. I am aware of
  Router Solutions but have been told it converts to 2.8. Does anybody
  have practical experience as to the completeness of the conversion
  and weaknesses/strengths of the conversion?
 
  Thanks,
 
  Jim McGrath
  CAD Connections, Inc.
 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*  - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager

Re: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion

2001-08-15 Thread Colin Weber

Folks,

What version of Allegro are you trying to convert from?

The reason I ask is that we have files in version 8.x from 6 years ago. 
When I investigated
converting these to Protel it didn't appear possible. Cadence themselves 
could only bring
our old version files into their latest version be iterating through every 
version of software they
produced since version 8, one at a time, all separate installations. 
Needless to say that also
required a great deal of sucking up and money to accomplish.

We now have a contractor manually convert any old files we need to rework, 
depending
upon the level of changes. Other than that all the legacy files are kept in 
CAM350 as
Gerbers. We did keep the netlists which makes the checking easier when 
redrawing the
schematics into Protel.

To summarise, from our investigations, apart from the converter you mention 
below, I am
not aware of any other solutions. Version 2.8 of Protel is the only version 
RSI seem to
support. We have a design from Veribest/Mentor RSI have a translator for, 
and it too is
for version 2.8.


At 02:47 PM 15/08/2001 -0700, you wrote:
Bob,

I don't know what Allegro goes for but the converter I researched was
$11,400 to go both ways. Ouch!

Jim McGrath
CAD Connections Inc.

Bob Jones wrote:

  Hi Jim,
  I guess nobody cares about your Allegro problems
  What's cheaper the converter or Allegro?
 
  Bob Jones
  Digitized Technologies
  2 Summit Road
  P.O.Box 7284
  Prospect, CT. 06712-1541
  Tel: 203-758-6312
  Fax: 203-758-3338
  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Notice:  This message is intended solely for the person to whom it
  is addressed.  Unintended recipients will be legally responsible for
  unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or distribution.  If you have
  received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately
  by replying to this message.  Then delete this message from your
  system.  Thank you.
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Jim McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 1:37 PM
  Subject: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion
 
   Hi All,
  
   I have a request from a customer to take in their Alegro PCB files and
   modify/finish work that has been started in house. I am aware of
   Router Solutions but have been told it converts to 2.8. Does anybody
   have practical experience as to the completeness of the conversion
   and weaknesses/strengths of the conversion?
  
   Thanks,
  
   Jim McGrath
   CAD Connections, Inc.
  


Regards,

Colin Weber

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*  - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion

2001-08-15 Thread Colin Weber

I have used the extract command of Allegro and it works well. From memory, 
It has
more options than just the text interface it present the user with. You can 
drive it
without the interface. I found converting the data it presented (using AWK 
at the time)
still took some time to do. The way libraries are managed presented problems.
This may be something to be aware of when wanting to match libraries in Protel,
if using this method.

The contractor I had translate a Protel PCB into Veribest/Mentor using the 
RSI tool
said the conversion from Protel went well and had little rework to make the 
translation
complete. However, going back to Protel is where he was skeptical and hasn't as
yet tried. If you'd like I'll keep you posted when he gets around to trying 
this.

I have also realised that at the time of posting my last email you would be 
using
a late version of Cadence as the older ones had Y2K issues.



At 05:31 PM 15/08/2001 -0400, you wrote:
The problem may not be just limited to protel ascii 2.8 limitations.

There are a few homebrew options but some may seem more impractical than
others


5) purchase said package in (4) or get that company to provide you with
following:

there is an extract utility (I forget the name of itcds_extract???
allegro_extract???) that comes with the Cadence tools that will directly
read the binary brd file and give you a text file of the extracted
primitives... A PERL script could make breakfast out of that and convert it
to protel ascii

the extract utility uses a text file to describe what kind of information to
extract from the brd file and then generates said output text file...

6) use router solutions inc.


Allegro is super powerful while protel's UI is far superior and makes boards
a joy
-chris


Regards,

Colin Weber

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*  - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion

2001-08-15 Thread Colin Weber

Ivan,

I totally agree with your comments. Looking back I wish I'd created ASCII 
versions
and saved them. Not that it would have done me any good. We did keep the 
original
design files and stored them in the company fire proof safe. BUT, some 
idiot decided
to clean up the safe and through them out, along with other vital stuff!!! 
Ironically it
turned out to be someone high up the food chain, so nothing was done about it.

I did have a few other things against me. The licenses ran on Unix and the old
workstations were becoming hard (read, expensive to a new share driven company)
to maintain. The licenses also expired in Dec 1999. Why don't we own 
software we
pay over $180k for?



At 06:18 PM 15/08/2001 -0400, you wrote:
I have a few thoughts on file conversions that might be of help.  Of course,
this probably won't help you with your problem now.  But going forward into
the future, it might.

Rule #1:  NEVER get rid of your old CAD program software.  Keep the original
media and make a backup copy every 2-4 years or so.  This goes for the OS it
runs on, too.

Rule #2:  If someone wants to clean house and get rid of old software, see
rule #1.  If your company leases vault space, you might consider putting
software in it to prevent it being thrown out.

Rule #3:  Save some non-native format versions of your CAD files.  For
example, a Protel SCH should be saved also as a ASCII file, a DXF, and a
PDF.  That way you can at least print a fresh copy when the old ones have
been worn out or lost.

Rule #4:  For any current (still shipping) designs that you may want to
revise, bring your CAD data forward into the latest
Protel version.  But DO NOT delete your old Protel version CAD files.

Rule #5:  Make new archival copies of CAD data every 2-4 years on whatever
the current media is (yesterday floppies, today CD-R, tomorrow who knows?).

Rule #6:  Keep a PC that is capable of running those old CAD programs should
you need to resort to one.  This is easy now since the PC is still king, but
when the X86 architecture is left behind, you're going to need that old
dinosaur PC.

This week I am going through my old designs (some of which date back to
1989) and bringing them forward.  It would be much more difficult if I
didn't still have those old CAD programs.  I tried that eCapture thing to
bring Orcad files forward to Orcad DSN format, but never could get it to
work.  It was easier to use SDT3 itself to make SRC libs to import into
Protel v3.X.  Then I saved it in Protel 3.X format and imported it into
Protel 99SE.  Some cleanup was required, but the results were pretty good.
Why did Protel not put the ability to import Orcad SDT3 schematics in 99SE;
it was in 3.X?

Every gizmo you ever design will be a legacy item some day.  So, keep all
your Protel versions!  And other CAD program versions!

Best regards,
Ivan Baggett
Bagotronix Inc.
website:  www.bagotronix.com


- Original Message -
From: Colin Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion


  Folks,
 
  What version of Allegro are you trying to convert from?
 
  The reason I ask is that we have files in version 8.x from 6 years ago.
  When I investigated
  converting these to Protel it didn't appear possible. Cadence themselves
  could only bring
  our old version files into their latest version be iterating through every
  version of software they
  produced since version 8, one at a time, all separate installations.
  Needless to say that also
  required a great deal of sucking up and money to accomplish.
 
  We now have a contractor manually convert any old files we need to rework,
  depending
  upon the level of changes. Other than that all the legacy files are kept
in
  CAM350 as
  Gerbers. We did keep the netlists which makes the checking easier when
  redrawing the
  schematics into Protel.
 
  To summarise, from our investigations, apart from the converter you
mention
  below, I am
  not aware of any other solutions. Version 2.8 of Protel is the only
version
  RSI seem to
  support. We have a design from Veribest/Mentor RSI have a translator for,
  and it too is
  for version 2.8.
 
 
  At 02:47 PM 15/08/2001 -0700, you wrote:
  Bob,
  
  I don't know what Allegro goes for but the converter I researched was
  $11,400 to go both ways. Ouch!
  
  Jim McGrath
  CAD Connections Inc.
  
  Bob Jones wrote:
  
Hi Jim,
I guess nobody cares about your Allegro problems
What's cheaper the converter or Allegro?
   
Bob Jones
Digitized Technologies
2 Summit Road
P.O.Box 7284
Prospect, CT. 06712-1541
Tel: 203-758-6312
Fax: 203-758-3338
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
Notice:  This message is intended solely for the person to whom it
is addressed.  Unintended recipients will be legally responsible for
unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or distribution.  If you have

Re: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion

2001-08-15 Thread Bagotronix Tech Support

 and saved them. Not that it would have done me any good. We did keep the
 original
 design files and stored them in the company fire proof safe. BUT, some
 idiot decided
 to clean up the safe and through them out, along with other vital stuff!!!

Well then, put it someplace safe from the pointy-haired boss!

Best regards,
Ivan Baggett
Bagotronix Inc.
website:  www.bagotronix.com


- Original Message -
From: Colin Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion


 Ivan,

 I totally agree with your comments. Looking back I wish I'd created ASCII
 versions
 and saved them. Not that it would have done me any good. We did keep the
 original
 design files and stored them in the company fire proof safe. BUT, some
 idiot decided
 to clean up the safe and through them out, along with other vital stuff!!!
 Ironically it
 turned out to be someone high up the food chain, so nothing was done about
it.

 I did have a few other things against me. The licenses ran on Unix and the
old
 workstations were becoming hard (read, expensive to a new share driven
company)
 to maintain. The licenses also expired in Dec 1999. Why don't we own
 software we
 pay over $180k for?



 At 06:18 PM 15/08/2001 -0400, you wrote:
 I have a few thoughts on file conversions that might be of help.  Of
course,
 this probably won't help you with your problem now.  But going forward
into
 the future, it might.
 
 Rule #1:  NEVER get rid of your old CAD program software.  Keep the
original
 media and make a backup copy every 2-4 years or so.  This goes for the OS
it
 runs on, too.
 
 Rule #2:  If someone wants to clean house and get rid of old software,
see
 rule #1.  If your company leases vault space, you might consider putting
 software in it to prevent it being thrown out.
 
 Rule #3:  Save some non-native format versions of your CAD files.  For
 example, a Protel SCH should be saved also as a ASCII file, a DXF, and a
 PDF.  That way you can at least print a fresh copy when the old ones have
 been worn out or lost.
 
 Rule #4:  For any current (still shipping) designs that you may want to
 revise, bring your CAD data forward into the latest
 Protel version.  But DO NOT delete your old Protel version CAD files.
 
 Rule #5:  Make new archival copies of CAD data every 2-4 years on
whatever
 the current media is (yesterday floppies, today CD-R, tomorrow who
knows?).
 
 Rule #6:  Keep a PC that is capable of running those old CAD programs
should
 you need to resort to one.  This is easy now since the PC is still king,
but
 when the X86 architecture is left behind, you're going to need that old
 dinosaur PC.
 
 This week I am going through my old designs (some of which date back to
 1989) and bringing them forward.  It would be much more difficult if I
 didn't still have those old CAD programs.  I tried that eCapture thing to
 bring Orcad files forward to Orcad DSN format, but never could get it to
 work.  It was easier to use SDT3 itself to make SRC libs to import into
 Protel v3.X.  Then I saved it in Protel 3.X format and imported it into
 Protel 99SE.  Some cleanup was required, but the results were pretty
good.
 Why did Protel not put the ability to import Orcad SDT3 schematics in
99SE;
 it was in 3.X?
 
 Every gizmo you ever design will be a legacy item some day.  So, keep all
 your Protel versions!  And other CAD program versions!
 
 Best regards,
 Ivan Baggett
 Bagotronix Inc.
 website:  www.bagotronix.com
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Colin Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:41 PM
 Subject: Re: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion
 
 
   Folks,
  
   What version of Allegro are you trying to convert from?
  
   The reason I ask is that we have files in version 8.x from 6 years
ago.
   When I investigated
   converting these to Protel it didn't appear possible. Cadence
themselves
   could only bring
   our old version files into their latest version be iterating through
every
   version of software they
   produced since version 8, one at a time, all separate installations.
   Needless to say that also
   required a great deal of sucking up and money to accomplish.
  
   We now have a contractor manually convert any old files we need to
rework,
   depending
   upon the level of changes. Other than that all the legacy files are
kept
 in
   CAM350 as
   Gerbers. We did keep the netlists which makes the checking easier when
   redrawing the
   schematics into Protel.
  
   To summarise, from our investigations, apart from the converter you
 mention
   below, I am
   not aware of any other solutions. Version 2.8 of Protel is the only
 version
   RSI seem to
   support. We have a design from Veribest/Mentor RSI have a translator
for,
   and it too is
   for version 2.8.
  
  
   At 02:47 PM 15/08/2001 -0700, you wrote:
   Bob,
   
   I don't know what Allegro goes

Re: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion

2001-08-15 Thread chris mackensen

Yes, please keep posted... I still occasionally work for a service bureau
that uses Allegro/Mentor/Valor/SpecctraQuest/CCT (even though I really am an
EE that writes software for a living rather than lay out boards for a
living)...

yes, some of these scripts can take some time to write... especially if it
not a throw away script and needs to be used by others...  I wrote the
netlist translator in about 5~10 minutes in straight PERL (then spiffed it
up for others to use for another 10~20 minutes). But now PERL has an object
oriented extension to which objectified reusability may contribute to less
time to write some (almost application class) proper code to do some of the
more mundane bi-directional munging...

Since I do not own Allegro, if someone gave me a simple extract file of a
simple multi layer board and an example protel ascii version of the same,
then I should be able to write a bi-dir mungifier...  Of course a recursive
decent parser generated by lex/yacc type grammar rules could make the work
even faster!  oddly enough, a module of such does exist for PERL...

caveat programmor...

Cheers,
-chris

-Original Message-
From: Colin Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 6:07 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Alegro Conversion


I have used the extract command of Allegro and it works well. From memory,
It has
more options than just the text interface it present the user with. You can
drive it
without the interface. I found converting the data it presented (using AWK
at the time)
still took some time to do. The way libraries are managed presented
problems.
This may be something to be aware of when wanting to match libraries in
Protel,
if using this method.

The contractor I had translate a Protel PCB into Veribest/Mentor using the
RSI tool
said the conversion from Protel went well and had little rework to make the
translation
complete. However, going back to Protel is where he was skeptical and hasn't
as
yet tried. If you'd like I'll keep you posted when he gets around to trying
this.

I have also realised that at the time of posting my last email you would be
using
a late version of Cadence as the older ones had Y2K issues.



At 05:31 PM 15/08/2001 -0400, you wrote:
The problem may not be just limited to protel ascii 2.8 limitations.

There are a few homebrew options but some may seem more impractical than
others


5) purchase said package in (4) or get that company to provide you with
following:

there is an extract utility (I forget the name of itcds_extract???
allegro_extract???) that comes with the Cadence tools that will directly
read the binary brd file and give you a text file of the extracted
primitives... A PERL script could make breakfast out of that and convert it
to protel ascii

the extract utility uses a text file to describe what kind of information
to
extract from the brd file and then generates said output text file...

6) use router solutions inc.


Allegro is super powerful while protel's UI is far superior and makes
boards
a joy
-chris


Regards,

Colin Weber

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*  - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



[PEDA] Alegro Conversion

2001-08-13 Thread Jim McGrath

Hi All,

I have a request from a customer to take in their Alegro PCB files and
modify/finish work that has been started in house. I am aware of
Router Solutions but have been told it converts to 2.8. Does anybody
have practical experience as to the completeness of the conversion
and weaknesses/strengths of the conversion?

Thanks,

Jim McGrath
CAD Connections, Inc.



* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html
*  - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/proteledaforum@techservinc.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *