Fabian Hartery wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I have some real strange behavior going on with the dreaded hidden pins.
These are being assigned sub-nets and are showing global netlist behavior
where none exists. That means, a floating terminal of part 1, pin 2, is
shown associated with pin 2 of
On 01:08 PM 14/03/2001 -03-30, Fabian Hartery said:
Hi Everyone,
I have some real strange behavior going on with the dreaded hidden pins.
These are being assigned sub-nets and are showing global netlist behavior
where none exists. That means, a floating terminal of part 1, pin 2, is
shown
At 01:08 PM 3/14/01 -03-30, Fabian Hartery wrote:
I have some real strange behavior going on with the dreaded hidden pins.
These are being assigned sub-nets and are showing global netlist behavior
where none exists. That means, a floating terminal of part 1, pin 2, is
shown associated with pin 2
, Newfoundland
-Original Message-
From: Peter Bennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 5:08 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Strange behavior on unconnected pins
Fabian Hartery wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I have some real strange behavior going
At 11:44 AM 3/15/01 +1100, Ian Wilson wrote:
There should be a quick way to make top and bottom component classes and
assign them to already placed parts. Anyone know one?
Design|Classes click Component tab, click Class Generator - take it from
there. Never tried it myself.
From the
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:09:41 +1100, you wrote:
On 01:08 PM 14/03/2001 -03-30, Fabian Hartery said:
Hi Everyone,
I have some real strange behavior going on with the dreaded hidden pins.
These are being assigned sub-nets and are showing global netlist behavior
where none exists. That means, a
Hi Terry,
sorry, but I do not at all agree with you.
As for showing no connect pins - it is about as useful as adding a few
ficticious components to the schematic and marking them as not fitted and
nothing to do with the design?
These pins are not fictitious and have everything to do with the
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001 12:41:43 +0100, Gisbert wrote:
sorry, but I do not at all agree with you.
As for showing no connect pins - it is about as useful as adding a few
ficticious components to the schematic and marking them as not fitted and
nothing to do with the design?
These pins are not
