Re: [PEDA] Connectivity Nightmares

2002-12-01 Thread JaMi Smith
Basic Schematics 101: ~ ~ ~ Rule 37: NEVER apply more than one Signal Name to the same Signal. PERIOD. Rule 38: NEVER apply the same Signal Name to more than one Signal. PERIOD. ~ ~ ~ Rule 274: No ifs, ands, or buts about any of the preceding 273 Rules. PERIOD. Rule 275: Never think that

Re: [PEDA] Connectivity Nightmares

2002-11-27 Thread Matt . VanDeWerken
Another data point: When I just create a netlist, there are duplicate nets with the same name formed - the solution here is obviously to generate only one net with that name, and append the new nodes to the existing net. Is there an easy way of doing this, since I'll have to do it numerous times

Re: [PEDA] Connectivity Nightmares

2002-11-27 Thread Ian Wilson
At 12:36 PM 28/11/02 +1000, you wrote: Hi all: I usually use a hierarchical structure for my schematic documents, with a main document with all the connectors on it, then below that a block diagram, and then the actual circuitry on one or more levels below that. I'm currently doing a

Re: [PEDA] Connectivity Nightmares

2002-11-27 Thread Thomas
Forgive me if you already know this: If any buss connects to a port make sure the busses have net labels. For example an 8 way buss with lines D0 to D7 connected to a port needs a net label [D0..D7] without the quotes placed on it for connectivity also the port must have the same name (that is

Re: [PEDA] Connectivity Nightmares

2002-11-27 Thread Thomas
Do you have Descend into sheet parts ticked when running the synchroniser? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 28 November 2002 14:21 To: Protel EDA Forum Subject: Re: [PEDA] Connectivity Nightmares At 12:36 PM 28/11/02 +1000