Re: [PEDA] Inversion - WAS: PCB view from bottom of board??

2002-02-22 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 05:37 PM 2/22/2002 +, Jason Morgan wrote: >Another thing to add to the protel wish list should be mechanical layer >pairs. Yes, It might be good also that one of the pair be explicitly associated with either top or bottom, the other being the opposite. Absolutely desirable; an example of

Re: [PEDA] Inversion - WAS: PCB view from bottom of board??

2002-02-22 Thread Bob Wolfe
ROTECTED]> To: "'Protel EDA Forum'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 12:37 PM Subject: Re: [PEDA] Inversion - WAS: PCB view from bottom of board?? > On this subject, (I appologise if this has already been mentioned as I've > not followed

Re: [PEDA] Inversion - WAS: PCB view from bottom of board??

2002-02-22 Thread Jason Morgan
On this subject, (I appologise if this has already been mentioned as I've not followed the thread too well) Another thing to add to the protel wish list should be mechanical layer pairs. It should be possible for each mechanical (M) layer to pair it with another. Such that that when a component