Hi,
I found the culprit and it is not Protobuf.
Our project uses groovy, and as such I installed the Groovy Eclipse
plugin which incidently contains an Eclipse JDT patch. Removing this
patch makes everything compile normally.
I filed a bug on the groovy bug tracker.
Sorry for the noise,
On
http://www.zeroc.com/vsplugin.html
From: Kenton Varda [mailto:ken...@google.com]
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 12:18 PM
To: George Georgiev
Cc: Protocol Buffers
Subject: Re: protoc feature question
Is there precedent for other tools like protoc providing this
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
Well, the build-if-newer is handled by either Make or VisualStudio, not
by the compiler in either case.
Right, the link is to a build system plugin. I'm all for build system
plugins for protocol buffers but those
Good call. I've committed this as rev 226. Thanks.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 7:21 AM, pierreK pierre.keste...@cea.fr wrote:
Hello,
[I'm using protobuf-2.2.0]
I would to suggest a minor modification to the file src/Makefile.am
Currently an out-of-source build works only for native build.
Hmm, now I'm confused. They imply that libprotobuf should be linked with
both -pthread *and* -lpthread, as the latter registers libpthread as some
sort of auto-loaded dependency, I guess. The internet does not provide very
much useful info on what the real best practice is.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009
Sorry guys. Yes, I asked for something else. My bad.
How exactly this will handle the problem with the different output files?
From: Kenton Varda [mailto:ken...@google.com]
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 2:59 PM
To: Monty Taylor
Cc: George Georgiev; Protocol
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:25 PM, George Georgiev georgi.georg...@citrix.com
wrote:
How exactly this will handle the problem with the different output files?
It won't -- like I said, it's not what you were asking for.
We're still saying that your issue is the responsibility of the build
javac doesn't produce a java file - what you mean it will put it in its package
subfolder?
-Original Message-
From: henner.zel...@googlemail.com [mailto:henner.zel...@googlemail.com] On
Behalf Of Henner Zeller
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 4:34 PM
To: George Georgiev
Cc: Kenton
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:22 PM, George Georgiev georgi.georg...@citrix.com
wrote:
I think that protoc already has a compromise with pure compiler
functionality - namely placing the java class in the package subfolder.
Since you have so strong fillings not to make another compromise you
