Comment #2 on issue 370 by montoya@gmail.com: static initialization
problem with dlopen
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=370
I just tried this fix but it is not working. I will be trying to understand
why.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Comment #3 on issue 370 by montoya@gmail.com: static initialization
problem with dlopen
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=370
what I did was to set LOG messages at
src/google/protobuf/descriptor_database.cc
and
src/google/protobuf/message.cc
to warnings, returning true
Comment #4 on issue 205 by hamel.st...@gmail.com: Invalid strings are
delivered to application
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=205
It would help if the warning (in debug mode) also printed the message type
name.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Comment #9 on issue 351 by tha...@chromium.org: Make protobuf_lite proto
files not create any static initializers
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=351
Fixed, right?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol
Buffers group
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 393 by robnap...@gmail.com: Allow configure to disable maintainer
mode
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=393
Currently protobuf does not support disabling automake's maintainer mode
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #10 on issue 351 by pli...@google.com: Make protobuf_lite proto
files not create any static initializers
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=351
Yes, finally :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment #3 on issue 363 by joshamah...@gmail.com: Downloads section should
include Mac binary
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=363
Just a quick note regarding the comment about xcode on snow leopard. I
faced the same issue - having difficulty finding a free version
Comment #49 on issue 66 by sneakatdatav...@gmail.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
This is live again as of 10 Jun 2012 with the default setuptools/python2.7
that ship on current osx:
europa:~▻ easy_install protobuf
Searching
Comment #50 on issue 66 by rem...@google.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
I'm not sure why easy_install insists on using
http://protobuf.googlecode.com/files/protobuf-2.4.1.zip (which hasn't been
updated) instead of the PyPI
Comment #14 on issue 213 by diego.fe...@gmail.com: libprotobuf.so.6 not
found after installation
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=213
ldconfig fixed it for me as well!
thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol
Buffers
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 394 by lichenw...@gmail.com: Improvement suggestion
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=394
Hello, what is the proper way to share improvement suggestion? I did not
find any contact information.
My email
Comment #1 on issue 394 by marc.gravell: Improvement suggestion
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=394
You should *probably* discuss this in the group first:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/protobuf/V0gnLIWS744 ,
ideally checking the history first - it may
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 395 by eagle...@gmail.com: Support inheritance
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=395
It'll be more convenient for developers to use protocol buffer if it
support inheritance. So we can define
Issue 351: Make protobuf_lite proto files not create any static initializers
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=351
This issue is now blocking issue chromium:105626.
See http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=105626
--
You received this message because you are listed
Issue 351: Make protobuf_lite proto files not create any static initializers
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=351
This issue is now blocking issue chromium:105626.
See http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=105626
--
You received this message because you are listed
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 394 by liuj...@google.com: Improvement suggestion
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=394
As Marc pointed out, please send questions/suggestions to the group.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #1 on issue 395 by liuj...@google.com: Support inheritance
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=395
Inheritance has been discussed and rejected many times. If you'd like to
discuss it again, please bring it up on the mailing list
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #1 on issue 393 by liuj...@google.com: Allow configure to disable
maintainer mode
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=393
Thanks for the patch.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol
Updates:
Owner: pli...@google.com
Comment #2 on issue 392 by liuj...@google.com: Can't compile protobuf
generated code for NaCl in 64-bit mode
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=392
Philippe, is the issue still valid (after the recent fix)?
--
You received
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #2 on issue 391 by liuj...@google.com: Patch for
/trunk/src/google/protobuf/io/zero_copy_stream_impl_lite.cc
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=391
Thanks for the patch.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #1 on issue 390 by liuj...@google.com: RepeatedFieldAccessor
UnsupportedOperationException detail message wrong
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=390
Thanks for the patch.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #2 on issue 388 by liuj...@google.com: Patch of
/protobuf/src/google/protobuf/compiler/command_line_interface.cc
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=388
The make_pair related violation will be fixed in the next release.
--
You
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #1 on issue 387 by liuj...@google.com: -lz in protobuf.pc belongs
in Libs.private, not Libs
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=387
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 386 by liuj...@google.com: japanese characters garbled
after XmlFormat.merge
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=386
I don't think official protobuf library provides XmlFormat class. You may
want to create issues in http
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #1 on issue 383 by liuj...@google.com: Compilation Fails with g++
2.95.3
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=383
Sorry, but protobuf now only supports gcc 3 and 4. However, we are happy to
accept a patch to make it work for 2.x
Updates:
Status: NeedPatchFromUser
Comment #2 on issue 385 by liuj...@google.com: make install does not use
INSTALL_PREFIX
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=385
Sorry, there isn't enough man-power for those kind of feature requests.
Please provide a patch if you
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 384 by liuj...@google.com: ant task (we just got Access
is Denied so pure java ant task would be nice)
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=384
Sorry, protobuf doesn't officially support ant or git.
--
You received
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #1 on issue 382 by liuj...@google.com: improving GOOGLE_ARRAYSIZE
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=382
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol
Updates:
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement
Comment #1 on issue 381 by liuj...@google.com: Do not use heap where stack
can be used
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=381
Marked as feature request.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 376 by liuj...@google.com: Patch for
/trunk/examples/addressbook.proto
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=376
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Comment #3 on issue 366 by liuj...@google.com: Patch for
/trunk/src/google/protobuf/repeated_field.h
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=366
Issue 365 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 366
Comment #2 on issue 365 by liuj...@google.com: Unused parameters in
repeated_field.h cause build errors when using clang if -Werror -Wall is
enabled
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=365
(No comment was entered
Updates:
Status: WorkingAsIntended
Comment #3 on issue 374 by liuj...@google.com: Add method in ByteString to
avoid big buffer copy.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=374
We cannot provide this which will break the immutability semantics of
ByteString.
--
You
Updates:
Labels: FixedIn-2.5.0
Comment #2 on issue 393 by liuj...@google.com: Allow configure to disable
maintainer mode
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=393
fixed in r419, will be included in the 2.5.0 release
--
You received this message because you
Updates:
Labels: FixedIn-2.5.0
Comment #2 on issue 389 by liuj...@google.com: Patch: for VC11 need set
preprocessor definition _VARIADIC_MAX=10;
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=389
Fixed in r420. Please verify if the change is ok (don't have the
environment right
Updates:
Labels: FixedIn-2.5.0
Comment #2 on issue 387 by liuj...@google.com: -lz in protobuf.pc belongs
in Libs.private, not Libs
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=387
Fixed in r421
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment #3 on issue 385 by mste...@gmail.com: make install does not use
INSTALL_PREFIX
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=385
Thanks for your comment.
I am now using
make DESTDIR=installdir install
and this works like using INSTALL_PREFIX
Maybe this could be added
Comment #3 on issue 392 by pli...@google.com: Can't compile protobuf
generated code for NaCl in 64-bit mode
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=392
The recent fix, although it looks related, does not help. I'm integrating
Sergey's patch. Small changes need to be done
Comment #4 on issue 363 by ylia...@gmail.com: Downloads section should
include Mac binary
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=363
yes +1 for Macbinary
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol
Buffers group.
To post to this group
Comment #5 on issue 324 by lukera...@gmail.com: Feature: Add a new
primitive type for a DateTime format
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=324
The issue is not about the best representation of the datetime as it is
serialised (ms since epoch seems fine to me) it is whether
Comment #4 on issue 370 by asierg...@gmail.com: static initialization
problem with dlopen
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=370
Same problem. The patch did not fix my issue.
I am using protobuf 2.4.1 in Windows 7 and MingW (gcc version 4.4).
--
You received this message
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: FixedIn-2.5.0
Comment #2 on issue 333 by liuj...@google.com: Wrong syntax pattern in
editors/proto.vim
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=333
fixed in r422
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Comment #5 on issue 370 by montoya@gmail.com: static initialization
problem with dlopen
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=370
We did not have this problem in Windows 7 with VisualStudio 2010
:(
Anyway, We finally decided to switch to apache thrift.
--
You received
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Patch
New issue 396 by thiago.c...@gmail.com: Remove dependency on setuputils to
declare namespace
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=396
This patch was suggested by Valentin Hăloiu on 26/jun/12 on the mailing
list.
Attachments
Comment #51 on issue 66 by a...@northisup.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Can somebody update the file at
http://protobuf.googlecode.com/files/protobuf-2.4.1.zip?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 397 by jaysoona...@gmail.com: problem of using protobuf on hadoop
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=397
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.Compile my .proto file with java_out.
2.It's
Comment #1 on issue 397 by liuj...@google.com: problem of using protobuf on
hadoop
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=397
Please make sure the protobuf.jar runtime on your remote host matches your
protoc version. My guess is your remote host uses a stalled protobuf
runtime
Comment #2 on issue 397 by jaysoona...@gmail.com: problem of using protobuf
on hadoop
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=397
Yeah, I am sure that they are the same version. I packed corresponding
protobuf.jar up my project, and the remote host didn't install any version
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 398 by mjkl...@gmail.com: Compiler Errors in VS2012 - With some
solutions
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=398
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Open the project files in VS2012
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 399 by cbsm...@gmail.com: Add support for using batch files to
wrap plugins on Windows
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=399
Windows has this annoying requirement that plugins be .exe's
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 400 by lucasash...@gmail.com: Missing LIBPROTOBUF_EXPORT tag on
GzipOutputStream::Options structure
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=400
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Configure
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 401 by martin.c...@gmail.com: Java generated message field
getters should return null or throw an exception for uninitialized fields
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=401
What steps
Comment #2 on issue 401 by martin.c...@gmail.com: Java generated message
field getters should return null or throw an exception for uninitialized
fields
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=401
Well, I know about this usage, but even it is intended it is prone
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 402 by hlhhuang...@gmail.com: question for clear and parse
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=402
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.define a complex protobuf structrue (name: Record)
2
Comment #1 on issue 402 by liuj...@google.com: question for clear and parse
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=402
This is a quite common use-case, and there shouldn't be any memory leaks.
I'd suspect the leak happened somewhere else in your code. Can you provide
a complete
Comment #2 on issue 402 by hlhhuang...@gmail.com: question for clear and
parse
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=402
I can only give you these codes , hope it is clear.
thank you.
Attachments:
codes.rar 166 KB
--
You received this message because you
Comment #3 on issue 402 by hlhhuang...@gmail.com: question for clear and
parse
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=402
I saw a little bit of source code, ParseFromCodedStream() calls
message::Clear(), but Clear() avoids freeing memory. you must delete it if
you want
Comment #4 on issue 402 by liuj...@google.com: question for clear and parse
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=402
Protobuf is opensourced for over 4 years, and we have memory leak tests
(tc_malloc heap check) before each release. I'm quite confident that
repeatedly Clear
Comment #6 on issue 402 by liuj...@google.com: question for clear and parse
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=402
Clear() resets the fields to their default values. So after a Clear(), you
can treat the message the same as a just created new message.(though we
cache sub
Comment #7 on issue 402 by hlhhuang...@gmail.com: question for clear and
parse
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=402
I am so sorry that i have no right to give you all the codes (In my
opinion, I think the problem lies in this part of the code. Maybe). I will
make
Comment #8 on issue 402 by hlhhuang...@gmail.com: question for clear and
parse
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=402
hi,master, the struction of Recordset class I define is Scalable and nested.
The parsed datas have different levels and fields. It can't always make
full
Comment #9 on issue 402 by liuj...@google.com: question for clear and parse
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=402
If we have such a message below, where Bar is a message type.
message Foo {
optional Bar bar = 1;
}
Then in C++ generated class, Foo class will have a Bar
Comment #10 on issue 402 by hlhhuang...@gmail.com: question for clear and
parse
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=402
Thank you for your detailed explanation.
But there is still memory increasing:
RecordSet* pRS = new RecordSet;
int count = 0;
while(1)
{
pRS-Clear
Comment #11 on issue 402 by liuj...@google.com: question for clear and parse
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=402
Yes, but the increasing rate will decelerate, and there will be a virtual a
cap for the total memory usage (when every optional field is allocated a
message).
Yes
Comment #12 on issue 402 by hlhhuang...@gmail.com: question for clear and
parse
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=402
By the way, I have Commented out codes as much as possible, staying parse()
only.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Comment #13 on issue 402 by hlhhuang...@gmail.com: question for clear and
parse
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=402
the increasing rate will decelerate, you are right. but using memory is
still a little large. and I uncertain whether it continues to increase.
--
You
Updates:
Status: WorkingAsIntended
Comment #14 on issue 402 by liuj...@google.com: question for clear and parse
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=402
My suggestion is that you test your memory usage for a long period of time
to find out the cap. If the cap is too
Comment #15 on issue 402 by hlhhuang...@gmail.com: question for clear and
parse
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=402
thank you every much !
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol
Buffers group.
To post to this group, send
Comment #52 on issue 66 by gregory@gmail.com: cannot install using
easy_install
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=66
Workaround: use easy_install's --allow-hosts options to force downloading
from PyPI:
easy_install --allow-hosts pypi.python.org protobuf
Worked
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 346
Comment #1 on issue 404 by liuj...@google.com: plugin.proto in the wrong
Java package
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=404
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 403 by dragonsinth: Java service insertion point needed, patch
attached
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=403
I have a protoc plugin, and its purpose is to generate a new style of
service
Updates:
Mergedinto: 345
Comment #2 on issue 404 by liuj...@google.com: plugin.proto in the wrong
Java package
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=404
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #1 on issue 405 by liuj...@google.com: c++ code generation for enum
does not handle namespaces properly
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=405
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you
Issue 351: Make protobuf_lite proto files not create any static initializers
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=351
This issue is now blocking issue chromium:94925.
See http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=94925
--
You received this message because you are listed
Issue 351: Make protobuf_lite proto files not create any static initializers
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=351
This issue is now blocking issue chromium:94925.
See http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=94925
--
You received this message because you are listed
Comment #9 on issue 298 by cgruberatg...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Here's a patch to the pom, adapted from Guice's info, that doesn't require
a packaging type change, and includes appropriate
Updates:
Owner: xiaof...@google.com
Comment #10 on issue 298 by liuj...@google.com: protobuf jar's manifest
should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you
Comment #1 on issue 344 by elivei...@gmail.com: Compile Error in Visual
Studio 2010 and 2011 (developer preview)
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=344
1) open .sln with VS 2010 and run conversion wizard
2) set configuration to debug
3) build solution
Result:
Error 1 error
Comment #2 on issue 344 by elivei...@gmail.com: Compile Error in Visual
Studio 2010 and 2011 (developer preview)
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=344
This was with version 2.4.1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol
Buffers
Comment #11 on issue 298 by cgruberatg...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's
manifest should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Woops - better - updated plugin version for osgi generation.
Attachments:
osgi.patch 3.3 KB
--
You received this message
Comment #12 on issue 298 by cgruberatg...@gmail.com: protobuf jar's
manifest should include OSGi metadata
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=298
Crp. Fixed typo in project url.
Attachments:
osgi.patch 3.3 KB
--
You received this message because you
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 407 by whatmann...@gmail.com: Build fail with clang on OS X
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=407
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Try to build on OS X with clang
2. Build fails
What
Comment #1 on issue 407 by whatmann...@gmail.com: Build fail with clang on
OS X
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=407
Additionally when trying to build with libc++, there's another error. It
appears to be fixed by this patch:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/ports
Comment #2 on issue 407 by whatmann...@gmail.com: Build fail with clang on
OS X
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=407
libc++ build also requires changing this line:
src/google/protobuf/compiler/command_line_interface.cc:913
proto_path_.push_back(make_pairstring
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 408 by markus.d...@gmail.com: sigsegv when running on arm - help
in debug
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=408
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. compile and link protobuf 4.2.1
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 409 by rob.iver...@gmail.com: protocol message fields with Java
reserved words not always compiled correctly
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=409
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1
Comment #3 on issue 318 by schre...@gmail.com: Unit tests
CommandLineInterfaceTest.OutputDirectoryIsFileError failes on Windows 7
VS2008
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=318
I'm getting a very similar error from that test case on AIX 5.2:
[ RUN
Comment #1 on issue 408 by markus.d...@gmail.com: sigsegv when running on
arm - help in debug
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=408
Just tried again with older linaro gcc (and normal gccs) with similar
outbut (but some differences) - maybe this helps more in debug
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 410 by allon.guralnek: Add the ability to enumerate MetaType's
members
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=410
MetaType allows adding fields, and retriving their ValueMember objects back
via
Comment #1 on issue 410 by allon.guralnek: Add the ability to enumerate
MetaType's members
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=410
Ooops, opened in wrong project. Sorry! (please delete)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 411 by aneumann...@gmail.com: Empty java_outer_classname =
leads to .java file
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=411
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Create a .proto file, set
Comment #2 on issue 408 by markus.d...@gmail.com: sigsegv when running on
arm - help in debug
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=408
fixed it ... protobuf was not the problem, it was a linking error (afaik)
of my binary. sorry for the confusion. this can be closed.
--
You
Comment #6 on issue 295 by xgw.s...@gmail.com: C++ Compilation of 2.4.1
fails GLIBCXX_3.4.11 Not found
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=295
i got the same problem and after running autogen.sh to re-generate the
configure script, it seems ok to compile. I am not familiar
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 413 by vvnicho...@gmail.com: No GYP file
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=413
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Open protobuf folder
What is the expected output?
Expect a protobuf.gyp file like
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 414 by jekam...@gmail.com: Unexpected behavior of
ByteString.toString(charsetName) and ByteString.copyFrom(text, charsetName)
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=414
What steps will reproduce
Comment #1 on issue 360 by savelyev...@gmail.com: Precompiled header support
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=360
The actual issue is very easy to fix. I attached the changes I made to make
this work.
Here is how you can use it:
--cpp_out=pch=pch_name:protobuf_file
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 415 by tiff...@stormbit.net: Configure failed
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=415
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Unpack protobuf-2.4.1.tar.bz2
2. Run ./configure
3.
What
Updates:
Status: WorkingAsIntended
Comment #1 on issue 416 by jas...@google.com: HasField is throwing
UnsupportedOperationException on repeated fields
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=416
Do you really get an UnsupportedOperationException? You should get
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 417 by mattycla...@gmail.com: Extra semi-colon in
PROTOBUF_DEFINE_OPTIONS_ACCESSOR and READ_REPEATED_FIXED_SIZE_PRIMITIVE
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=417
What steps will reproduce
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 418 by n...@livefyre.com: Python message objects are unpickleable
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=418
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Run the following
import pickle
from something_pb2 import
901 - 1000 of 2000 matches
Mail list logo
