Is there something happening with the protocol buffers repository?
Mark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.co
this deadlock fixed in commit :
See
https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf-go/commit/13e7f145cc5761dc68252f725d240d04b641b01d
It's basically a deadlock on registration / initialisation of a descriptor.
Mark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On Thursday, 5 March 2020 18:15:44 UTC, tandr wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> you might want to open a bug on their bug tracker.
>
>>
>>
Will do. Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To
other projects' build systems?
>>
>
> Nicolas from grpc team is working on exactly this.
>
Thank you. That's helpful to know.
Mark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and st
directories, but this feels a
bit wrong.
All advice appreciated.
Thanks,
Mark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to protobu
Thanks for the suggestions. I started playing with just using regexes to
rewrite the .proto files and this seems to work.
On Friday, May 4, 2018 at 3:04:03 PM UTC-4, Mark Hoffman wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have the tasks of retrofitting a large repo of .proto files to include a
&g
Hi,
I have the tasks of retrofitting a large repo of .proto files to include a
field option with a default value to every field, except for enums. We
can't assume if the field option is not present that it has a default, for
security reasons. Before I go off an write a parser to handle this
Hi,
I have a little concern using the 'Any' type in java due to this message in
the docs:
*Currently the runtime libraries for working with Any types are under
development*.
Does anyone know what the status is for production use?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
One way to do this, that I have done in the past as to have a top level
protobuf object that has and enum (or uint...) and just a byte array (or
what ever the correct type is here).
This defines the basic container. You can use an enum to specify what the
payload will be, then you can just
Hello all,
Has anyone tried to compile protobuf up for Xilinx's MicroBlaze processor?
I'm currently trying with their 2015.2 release, but configure fails due to
missing sched_yeild? (and no rt lib).
I've attached the config.log.
I'm building under Centos 6.7 64bit.
Mark
--
You received
Hi Matteo,
It might be that in your .proto file you specified
option optimize_for = LITE_RUNTIME;
Mark
On Friday, March 8, 2013 5:00:54 PM UTC, Matteo Murgida wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to protobuf, I'm trying to serialize (C++) a simple message, but
the method SerializeToOstream
I can not find the protobuf build tool for android (nano protobuf). Any one
has exprienced with this please help me, thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol Buffers group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
Hi Everyone
I'm trying to build Protobuf Lite to work on Windows CE 5 on an ARM CPU and
I'm struggling with the functions from atomicops.h
Can someone give me a brief explanation of what they do where they are
used.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
this task
using XML?
Thanks,
Mark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol Buffers group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email
Thanks, guys.
https://codereview.appspot.com/6846047/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol
Buffers group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
I haven't tried any other version sorry. These tests were run from a clean
build of both 2.4.0a and 2.4.1.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol Buffers group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from
, additionally the release build crashes near the
end of the tests.
Has anybody else experienced this, or successfully built the 64 bit
version and have it passing the unit tests?
Thanks,
Mark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol Buffers group
It seems that the sub-builders introduced for Java in 2.4.0 help to
solve the issues in these two posts:
Making 'Data' classes mutable:
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf/browse_thread/thread/1699791071e92c83/fad54dd509a649ea
Builders containing builders:
solution. :)
Thanks,
Mark
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
My only guess is that your protobuf type wasn't actually referenced
anywhere in your program and so was dropped from the binary. Some linkers
do this. But it's weird that you have a pointer
That's a good idea. I'll try that. Thanks.
Mark
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Nick Bolton
nick.bolton...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Mark,
Comments welcome.
Mark
class ProtocolBufferFileReader:
def __init__(self, input_filename, message_constructor):
self.file
I wish I could pass a builder object to a method and have the method
modify either a value of the builder or a value of a sub-message in
the builder!
I came across this thread, which described exactly the problem I have.
The Car/Engine example in the thread is perfectly illustrative of my
for you?
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Mark mjsc...@gmail.com wrote:
I wish I could pass a builder object to a method and have the method
modify either a value of the builder or a value of a sub-message in
the builder!
I came across this thread, which described exactly the problem I
.
I am wondering if anyone has developed an approach to deal with this.
Best,
Mark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol Buffers group.
To post to this group, send email to proto...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email
, but it is also the most work (maybe not in the long
term).
Mark
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:28 PM, bart van deenen
bart.vandee...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all
How do you document .proto files? I'd love to really define our
protocol with javadoc/qtdoc/doxygen tags inside the .proto files, and
generate html
::shared_ptrZeroCopyInputStream ZeroCopyInputStreamPtr;
I've attached the .h/.cpp and the testcases I've written for the input
class. This will need to be linked with zlib.
If you spot any problems, I'd appreciate hearing about them. Thanks.
Mark
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:01 AM, bolson brian.ol
25 matches
Mail list logo