Comment #3 on issue 361 by van...@gmail.com: Fix warnings
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=361
There are also few warnings I don't know how to handle properly
protobuf-2.4.1\src\google\protobuf\text_format.cc:126: warning:
C4355: 'this' : used in base member initializer list
Comment #4 on issue 361 by nn1436...@gmail.com: Fix warnings
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=361
C4800: 'google::protobuf::uint64' : forcing value to bool 'true' or 'false'
This is simple write the correct expression.
Generates warning:
uint64 x = 1;
bool a = x;
No warning,
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 372 by m...@laiyonghao.com: command(protoc.exe --version
)returned 1
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=372
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.run python code below:
import subprocess
fro
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #5 on issue 361 by liuj...@google.com: Fix warnings
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=361
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol
Buffers" group.
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #1 on issue 350 by liuj...@google.com: FAIL: testPrintAllExtensions
while running for protobuf: python setup.py test
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=350
Looks like the \r\n problem.
--
You received this message because you are subs
Updates:
Cc: f...@google.com
Comment #1 on issue 355 by liuj...@google.com: SerializeToString question
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=355
The cpp implementation is quite experimental and known to have various
issues. Thanks for reporting this.
--
You received this
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #1 on issue 372 by liuj...@google.com: command(protoc.exe --version
)returned 1
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=372
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #1 on issue 371 by liuj...@google.com:
GeneratedMessageTest.MergeFromSelf CHECK failed: (&from) != (this)
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=371
gtest-1.6.0 have known issues working with protobuf tests. Since 2.4.1,
protobuf changes
Comment #6 on issue 361 by van...@gmail.com: Fix warnings
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=361
Thanks.
What about this:
src\google\protobuf\stubs\common_unittest.cc:75: warning: C4307: '+' :
integral constant overflow
EXPECT_EQ(0u, kuint32max + 1);
Seems like this is done
Comment #7 on issue 361 by tom.ritc...@gmail.com: Fix warnings
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=361
In my setup, at least, GCC doesn't complain about "forcing value to bool",
or about "'this' : used in base member initializer list".
I frankly think the "forcing value to boo
Status: New
Owner: liuj...@google.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 373 by van...@gmail.com: Tests hang/crash/don't pass without RTTI
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=373
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Add -fno-rtti -DGOOGLE_PROTOBUF_NO_RTTI to src/Ma
Comment #1 on issue 373 by van...@gmail.com: Tests hang/crash/don't pass
without RTTI
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=373
In fact, tests didn't even compile:
google/protobuf/extension_set_unittest.cc:618:67: error: "dynamic_cast" not
permitted with -fno-rtti
I made the
Comment #7 on issue 351 by pli...@google.com: Make protobuf_lite proto
files not create any static initializers
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=351
I am taking over this issue. Here is a first CL:
https://codereview.appspot.com/5643065/
--
You received this message beca
Comment #2 on issue 373 by van...@gmail.com: Tests hang/crash/don't pass
without RTTI
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=373
I've figured out that pthread_once() doesn't return. I have no idea what
pthread_once has to do with no-rtti...
Full stack attached.
Attachments:
Comment #3 on issue 373 by van...@gmail.com: Tests hang/crash/don't pass
without RTTI
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=373
Oh, it's an old bug:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/protobuf/w6uwDA2PQH4/discussion
Isn't it fixed yet?
--
You received this message because you
15 matches
Mail list logo
