[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Huston resolved PROTON-809.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.9
> Changes to build on AIX with IBM X
Steve Huston created PROTON-809:
---
Summary: Changes to build on AIX with IBM XL C
Key: PROTON-809
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-809
Project: Qpid Proton
Issue Type: Bug
Congratulations and welcome, Dominic!
> -Original Message-
> From: Robbie Gemmell [mailto:rob...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 6:04 AM
> To: us...@qpid.apache.org; proton@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Welcome Dominic Evans as a Qpid committer
>
> The Apache Qpid PMC have vote
QPID
Yes [X]
No [ ]
PROTON:
Yes [X]
No [ ]
> -Original Message-
> From: Robbie Gemmell [mailto:robbie.gemm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 7:04 AM
> To: d...@qpid.apache.org; proton@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Subversion to JIRA integration
>
> Hi all,
>
> As some of
n 01/18/2013 06:55 PM, Steve Huston wrote:
> > I agree that the qpid and proton users should be on the same list.
> > Also, it's useful for much of the development info to be open to the
> > users list. My only concern for a second list is for things that
> > committer
I agree that the qpid and proton users should be on the same list. Also, it's
useful for much of the development info to be open to the users list. My only
concern for a second list is for things that committers may need to talk about
but which the larger user community doesn't care about. For e
Good start to this discussion, Rajith.
I haven't worked with the current JMS client, so I'm not sure what the
"nagging issues" are, but my first reaction to the #2 path is it may give
you more opportunity for support in more environments over time. I can
envision proton going into environments whe
