Sounds good to me.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gordon Sim [mailto:g...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 5:12 PM
> To: us...@qpid.apache.org; proton@qpid.apache.org; d...@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: mailing lists and fragmented communication
>
> On 01/18/2013 06:55 PM, Steve Huston wrote:
> > I agree that the qpid and proton users should be on the same list.
> > Also, it's useful for much of the development info to be open to the
> > users list. My only concern for a second list is for things that
> > committers may need to talk about but which the larger user community
> > doesn't care about. For example, "who broke the build" or
> > questions/issues about the release process, etc.
>
> I sympathise with the concern, and certainly don't want to impose irrelevant
> emails on people.
>
> In practice I think the volume of messages is low and in my view at least,
> unlikely to be a serious nuisance.
>
> I do think that having wider awareness of and involvement in the release
> process would be a good thing for all of us. Sometimes even the 'who broke
> the build' type mails can convey what is coming down the road and allow
> users to comment or get involved earlier in the process.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional
> commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org
