On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:28 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Andrew Stitcher >wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:01 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > > > Can you comment on why you decided to inli
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:28 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:01 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > > Can you comment on why you decided to inline it directly into the C
> > header
> > > files as opposed to split
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:01 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > Can you comment on why you decided to inline it directly into the C
> header
> > files as opposed to splitting it out somehow? Given William's comment on
> > exceptions, it seem
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:01 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> Can you comment on why you decided to inline it directly into the C header
> files as opposed to splitting it out somehow? Given William's comment on
> exceptions, it seems like it might well expand/evolve enough to make it
> awkward to i
- Original Message -
> On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 14:16 -0400, William Henry wrote:
> > It looks very attractive. Any plans to include exceptions?
>
> I was debating exceptions: On the one hand I wanted a very slim layer
> with no hidden code - what is there now will pretty much compile
> dir
Can you comment on why you decided to inline it directly into the C header
files as opposed to splitting it out somehow? Given William's comment on
exceptions, it seems like it might well expand/evolve enough to make it
awkward to inline.
--Rafael
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Andrew Stitcher
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 14:16 -0400, William Henry wrote:
> It looks very attractive. Any plans to include exceptions?
I was debating exceptions: On the one hand I wanted a very slim layer
with no hidden code - what is there now will pretty much compile
directly in to the same code as the equivalent
It looks very attractive. Any plans to include exceptions?
(I like the use of 'auto' keyword. Had not seen it in code like this before.)
William
- Original Message -
> There is no proton group in reviewboard, so I'm forwarding this here
> for
> comment.
>
> Andrew
>
>
There is no proton group in reviewboard, so I'm forwarding this here for
comment.
Andrew
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6929/
-
