I'll take a look at the patch if you can resubmit it as a file. The patch
in the comment has lost formatting.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Miguel da Rocha Correia Lima <
mcorreial...@landix.com.br> wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> The PROTON-661 was useful for us. We are working with this pat
ge-
> From: Rafael Schloming [mailto:r...@alum.mit.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 9:55 AM
> To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: 0.8 release prep
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'd like to put out a 0.8 RC soon. I will be going through JIRA shortly in
> order to
On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 09:50 +0200, Bozo Dragojevic wrote:
> On 22. 09. 14 19:57, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-09-21 at 23:43 +0200, Bozo Dragojevic wrote:
> >> PROTON-660: Fix openssl.c build on windows
> > Are you planning to do this work yourself? If so please take into
> > account my
On 22. 09. 14 19:57, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-09-21 at 23:43 +0200, Bozo Dragojevic wrote:
>> PROTON-660: Fix openssl.c build on windows
> Are you planning to do this work yourself? If so please take into
> account my last comments on this bug. I'd work on it myself except that
> I don
On Sun, 2014-09-21 at 23:43 +0200, Bozo Dragojevic wrote:
> On 18. 09. 14 16:55, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > I'd like to put out a 0.8 RC soon. I will be going through JIRA shortly in
> > order to triage any remaining issues. If there are any particular issues
> > that you feel
Can we get this one in:
https://github.com/clebertsuconic/qpid-proton/tree/PROTON-694
The current version always gets me a Bytearray through EncodedMessage while I
just need the ProtonJMessage for a later encoding when dealing with JMS
Conversions.
I have a patch linked on the issue.
On S
On 18. 09. 14 16:55, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'd like to put out a 0.8 RC soon. I will be going through JIRA shortly in
> order to triage any remaining issues. If there are any particular issues
> that you feel strongly should be included in 0.8, please follow up on this
> thread
- Original Message -
> From: "Cliff Jansen"
> To: "proton"
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 12:04:25 PM
> Subject: Re: 0.8 release prep
>
> I would like someone with better Python/SWIG expertise to take a look
> at PROTON-687, at least
Message-
From: Rafael Schloming [mailto:r...@alum.mit.edu]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 9:55 AM
To: proton@qpid.apache.org
Subject: 0.8 release prep
Hi Everyone,
I'd like to put out a 0.8 RC soon. I will be going through JIRA shortly in
order to triage any remaining issues. If there ar
I would like someone with better Python/SWIG expertise to take a look
at PROTON-687, at least to confirm if the python swig wrapper for
pn_delivery_set_context (and other similar "borrowed" references) are
the culprits, or the victims of a bug elsewhere.
I would like to update PROTON-581 (Schannel
I have a commit that I would like to send towards a contrib component:
https://github.com/clebertsuconic/qpid-proton/commit/ab423a90f6b1e6d06c84615c5724497a3f9e8533
The current code is always encoding it as Bytes, and I need the ProtonJ as an
output on the case of the JMS component.
On Sep
Hi Rafael,
The PROTON-661 was useful for us. We are working with this
patch without any error.
We supose that it can be useful for others.
Miguel da Rocha Correia Lima
miguel at landix dot com dot br
Em 18/09/2014 11:55, Rafael Schloming escreveu:
Hi Everyone,
I'd like to pu
Hi Everyone,
I'd like to put out a 0.8 RC soon. I will be going through JIRA shortly in
order to triage any remaining issues. If there are any particular issues
that you feel strongly should be included in 0.8, please follow up on this
thread and bring them to my attention.
--Rafael
13 matches
Mail list logo
