[jira] [Created] (PROTON-99) Porting Issue -- pn_dtag macro does not compile with Visual Studio compiler

2012-10-23 Thread Mary hinton (JIRA)
Mary hinton created PROTON-99: - Summary: Porting Issue -- pn_dtag macro does not compile with Visual Studio compiler Key: PROTON-99 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-99 Project: Qpid Proto

initial release candidate

2012-10-23 Thread Rafael Schloming
Hi Everyone, I've posted an initial release candidate here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1/ Please keep in mind there hasn't been a wide variety of install testing so go ahead and try on as many different OS distro/versions as you can find and let me know if/when things break.

Re: initial release candidate

2012-10-23 Thread Ted Ross
On 10/23/2012 02:41 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: Hi Everyone, I've posted an initial release candidate here: http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1/ Please keep in mind there hasn't been a wide variety of install testing so go ahead and try on as many different OS distro/versions as y

Re: initial release candidate

2012-10-23 Thread William Henry
Well done. William - Original Message - > Hi Everyone, > > I've posted an initial release candidate here: > > http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1/ > > Please keep in mind there hasn't been a wide variety of install > testing so > go ahead and try on as many different OS dis

[jira] [Updated] (PROTON-98) Porting Issue -- Visual Studio compiler requires explicit casts

2012-10-23 Thread Mary hinton (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mary hinton updated PROTON-98: -- Attachment: ExplicitCasts.patch Here is a patch file with explicit casts > Porting Issu

[jira] [Created] (PROTON-100) Clean up examples README.txt file

2012-10-23 Thread William Henry (JIRA)
William Henry created PROTON-100: Summary: Clean up examples README.txt file Key: PROTON-100 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-100 Project: Qpid Proton Issue Type: Bug

Re: initial release candidate

2012-10-23 Thread Rafael Schloming
The doc issue should be fixed on trunk. I'll see if anymore problems come up. --Rafael On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Ted Ross wrote: > On 10/23/2012 02:41 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: > >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I've posted an initial release candidate here: >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/

Re: initial release candidate

2012-10-23 Thread Rafael Schloming
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: > The doc issue should be fixed on trunk. I'll see if anymore problems come > up. > Oops, hit send too soon... I'll see if anymore problems come up before generating more tarballs. --Rafael > > --Rafael > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:0

Re: initial release candidate

2012-10-23 Thread Hiram Chirino
-1 The java distro does not have the pom versions updated. See my comments on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-47 On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I've posted an initial release candidate here: > > http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-prot

Re: initial release candidate

2012-10-23 Thread William Henry
My Make failed: did as instucted all docs install: [100%] Built target _cproton Scanning dependencies of target docs-py Warning: 1 markup error was found while processing docstrings. Use the verbose switch (-v) to display markup errors. Built target docs-py Scanning dependencies of tar

Re: initial release candidate

2012-10-23 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:41:24PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I've posted an initial release candidate here: > > http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1/ > > Please keep in mind there hasn't been a wide variety of install testing so > go ahead and try on as many di

Re: initial release candidate

2012-10-23 Thread Rafael Schloming
Doh, missed that one in the noise. I'll roll that into the next one. --Rafael On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote: > -1 > > The java distro does not have the pom versions updated. See my comments on > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-47 > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2

Re: initial release candidate

2012-10-23 Thread Rafael Schloming
Were you running make install as root? --Rafael On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:31 PM, William Henry wrote: > My Make failed: did as instucted all docs install: > > [100%] Built target _cproton > Scanning dependencies of target docs-py > Warning: 1 markup error was found while processing docstrings.

Re: initial release candidate

2012-10-23 Thread Rafael Schloming
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:41:24PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > > > I've posted an initial release candidate here: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1/ > > > > Please keep in mind there hasn't bee

Re: initial release candidate

2012-10-23 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:54:30PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: > > What I'd like to see would be to have qpid-proton and qpid-proton-java > > as the two source tarballs if possible. That way I can keep the RPM > > named qpid-proton (I would rather not put -c into the name). > > I'm not so sure

Re: initial release candidate

2012-10-23 Thread William Henry
Nope. That makes sense. I just followed the instructions. William - Original Message - > Were you running make install as root? > > --Rafael > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:31 PM, William Henry > wrote: > > > My Make failed: did as instucted all docs install: > > > > [100%] Built targe

Re: initial release candidate

2012-10-23 Thread Andrew Stitcher
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 14:41 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I've posted an initial release candidate here: > > http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1/ > > Please keep in mind there hasn't been a wide variety of install testing so > go ahead and try on as many different

Re: initial release candidate

2012-10-23 Thread rhs
I'll add a note to the readme. On Oct 23, 2012 4:11 PM, "William Henry" wrote: > Nope. That makes sense. I just followed the instructions. > > William > > - Original Message - > > Were you running make install as root? > > > > --Rafael > > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:31 PM, William Henr