On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 06:56 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> Ok, I'll push out a 0.9 RC ASAP.
>
> On the general topic of API stability, I think the key measure of
> "stability" that I would personally like to see (be it 0.9 or 0.10) is not
> that we somehow freeze APIs and guarantee to never chan
- Original Message -
> From: "Rafael Schloming"
> To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> Cc: us...@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, March 9, 2015 6:56:49 AM
> Subject: Re: 0.9 release schedule
>
> Ok, I'll push out a 0.9 RC ASAP.
>
> On the general topic
t; From: "Andrew Stitcher"
> > > To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> > > Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 8:46:10 PM
> > > Subject: Re: 0.9 release schedule
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 20:00 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
> > > > On 03/02/201
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 08:50 -0500, Ken Giusti wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Andrew Stitcher"
> > To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> > Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 8:46:10 PM
> > Subject: Re: 0.9 release schedule
> >
> > On Mon, 2
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Stitcher"
> To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, March 2, 2015 8:46:10 PM
> Subject: Re: 0.9 release schedule
>
> On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 20:00 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
> > On 03/02/2015 07:07 PM, Rafael
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 20:46 -0500, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 20:00 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
> > On 03/02/2015 07:07 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > > I'd like to propose spinning the first beta (or possibly just RC) for 0.9
> > > sometime next week. We'
On 03/03/2015 01:46 AM, Andrew Stitcher wrote:
I'm happy to let the new API work be more carefully reviewed. The only
reason to me to get it in 0.9 is that 0.9 was intended to be a point for
API stability from then on. And the transport API is a significant
change in the engine API. Pushing it of
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 20:00 +, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 03/02/2015 07:07 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > I'd like to propose spinning the first beta (or possibly just RC) for 0.9
> > sometime next week. We've been using alphas to get some early eyes on some
> > of the new API
On 03/02/2015 07:07 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I'd like to propose spinning the first beta (or possibly just RC) for 0.9
sometime next week. We've been using alphas to get some early eyes on some
of the new APIs in this release. I think when Andrew's SASL work lands
there will be n
Hi Everyone,
I'd like to propose spinning the first beta (or possibly just RC) for 0.9
sometime next week. We've been using alphas to get some early eyes on some
of the new APIs in this release. I think when Andrew's SASL work lands
there will be no remaining work for 0.9 in the category of major
10 matches
Mail list logo
