[Prototype-core] Re: getElementsBySelector has different behaviour in 1.5.0 and 1.5.1

2007-06-13 Thread Jostein
On 13 Jun, 13:57, Mislav Marohnić [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you try frames[myIframe].document.body? Thanks, I tried, but it gave the same result. One thing that is strange, is that when I try to get elements with selectors like table or .class1 it works perfectly! It is just the ids (#id)

[Prototype-core] Re: getElementsBySelector has different behaviour in 1.5.0 and 1.5.1

2007-06-13 Thread Mislav Marohnić
On 6/13/07, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One thing that is strange, is that when I try to get elements with selectors like table or .class1 it works perfectly! It is just the ids (#id) that don't work. OK, so here is what you do now. Check out the latest trunk and try with it. If it

[Prototype-core] Re: getElementsBySelector has different behaviour in 1.5.0 and 1.5.1

2007-06-13 Thread Mislav Marohnić
On 6/13/07, Marius Feraru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ Seeing you mentioned myIframe (+ the reference to a document property), I'm assuming you're really talking about IFRAMEs, i.e. the HTML element ]. Why would anyone expect to be able to reach other folks' documents? ;-) It's ugly enough

[Prototype-core] Re: getElementsBySelector has different behaviour in 1.5.0 and 1.5.1

2007-06-13 Thread Mislav Marohnić
On 6/13/07, Marius Feraru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Neither Gecko 1.8 nor 1.9 are able to get the content of #myIframe. $('myIframe').contentDocument.body That is W3C standard. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[Prototype-core] Re: getElementsBySelector has different behaviour in 1.5.0 and 1.5.1

2007-06-13 Thread Marius Feraru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mislav Marohnić wrote: $('myIframe').contentDocument.body That is W3C standard. QED: I'm obsolete. :o) Thanks (again) a million, Mislav. :) - -- Marius Feraru -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

[Prototype-core] Re: Hijack Browser Loading

2007-06-13 Thread Michael Peters
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No matter what I try the images still load. Does anyone know how to hijack the browser and tell it not to load certain images? I might be wrong, but how a browser parses the HTML, decides what to download and when is all pretty browser specific. You probably can't

[Prototype-core] Re: Hijack Browser Loading

2007-06-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You could try having your Javascript modify the URLs of images that you want to hold off on loading. Unfortunately i've tried this out and it still loads the original images even though the swapped out image is displayed. I realize this is probably a browser specific thing, and may not be

[Prototype-core] Re: Hijack Browser Loading

2007-06-13 Thread Ken Snyder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey guys, I'm building a web app and am hoping to minimize the images loaded per page. I like the way YouTube only loads the thumbnails of the images you can see and then waits till you scroll before loading any others. They do this by placing img / tags for the

[Prototype-core] Event.element() oddity

2007-06-13 Thread jdalton
Hi Guys, I was using Event.element(event) in an image onload observer and I noticed that in IE, it would return the Image element while in FireFox it would return a [object HTMLDocument]. I used the guts of the Event.element and changed it to $ (event.currentTarget || event.srcElement) and that

[Prototype-core] Re: Hijack Browser Loading

2007-06-13 Thread Ken Snyder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A simple unobtrusive approach would be to have a drawer of thumbnails with a link to view more images. For JavaScript enabled browsers, simply override the functionality of that link to load a list of image locations from memory or by AJAX. The only problem

[Prototype-core] Re: Hijack Browser Loading

2007-06-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's a prototype I was working on: http://code.markhuot.com/image_trick/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype: Core group. To post to this group, send email to

[Prototype-core] Re: Event.element() oddity

2007-06-13 Thread Mislav Marohnić
Thanks for the report. This sounds serious enough to open up a ticket, can you do that? While we're at it, does anyone really know the difference between target and currentTarget? Doesn't one of them correspond to what the this keyword references when the event handler is executed? On 6/13/07,

[Prototype-core] Re: Event.element() oddity

2007-06-13 Thread Tobie Langel
event.currentTarget is the element the event was attached to (i.e. it's equivalent to this). event.target == event.srcElement is the element that triggered the event. So for example: ul id=myUl li id=myLiclick me/li /ul $('myUl').observe('click', callback); If I now click on the click me

[Prototype-core] Re: Event.element() oddity

2007-06-13 Thread Mislav Marohnić
On 6/14/07, Tobie Langel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: event.currentTarget is the element the event was attached to (i.e. it's equivalent to this). event.target == event.srcElement is the element that triggered the event. Thanks, thats what I thought. I guess MDC docs confused me by not making