Hi Jonas-
On Feb 22, 2009, at 4:26 AM, Jonas Schneider wrote:
I want to use sprockets in my rails app (the includes are just so
beautiful). Everything is working fine, but the files are always
concatenated, even in development. This sucks a bit for debugging; is
there an option to just output
This should be fixed in 6fb6308.
-sam
On Feb 11, 2009, at 6:01 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
Hi.
I think there is a problem using in the Sprockets Environment class.
The absolute() method is checking for /
--
-
Richard Quadling
Zend Certified Engineer :
Hi John-
On Dec 4, 2007, at 10:23 AM, John-David Dalton wrote:
$$('[type=radio]').map(function(el){return el.next()}); // = [label,
label]
$$('[type=radio]').map(Element.next); // = [label, undefined]
You can use Enumerable#invoke instead of map:
$$([type=radio]).invoke(next) // = [label,
On Nov 24, 2007, at 11:32 AM, Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
I've submitted a patch to trac for your consideration, which adds
array slices a' la Ruby
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/10268
Array objects in JavaScript already have a method called slice:
A small but important change was made to custom events in [7835] (http://dev.rubyonrails.org/changeset/7835
): all custom event names must now include a namespace. This is our
solution to the problem of custom event names conflicting with non-
standard native DOM events, such as mousewheel
On Aug 20, 2007, at 11:51 AM, Mislav Marohnić wrote:
You've been bitten by the fact the array is copied by reference, not
by value. You should be setting the initial value for instance
variables in the constructor: http://pastie.caboo.se/89338
I'm not sure if this is something we should
On Aug 9, 2007, at 5:56 PM, Severin Heiniger wrote:
Is there any reason not to remove the event handler(s) from the
private event cache when calling Event.stopObserving? The cache may
get messed up with dead handlers by and by especially when running
as a single page app. And - less
Hi Ken-
On Jul 24, 2007, at 11:43 AM, Ken Snyder wrote:
Just wanted to suggest a static method of the RegExp object as a
possible addition to core.
RegExp.escape = function(str) {
return str.replace(/([.*+?^=!:${}()|[\]\/\\])/g, '\\$1');
};
Good idea. Ruby has this, too, and I've
On Jul 4, 2007, at 10:23 PM, Andrew Dupont wrote:
On Jul 4, 1:52 pm, Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree on the multiple declaration syntax, but in the cases above,
those variables have already been declared earlier in the code and
are
simply assigned new values in the reported lines.
Hi Thomas-
On Mar 20, 2:23 pm, Thomas Broyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was about to use Prototype for its Ajax.Request facilities but soon
noticed that the method has to be GET or POST, otherwise it is
converted to a POST (as a new entry in the params Hash).
What if I want to issue a
On Feb 18, 2:24 pm, Marius Feraru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicely said, with one possible amendment: compactness as in code size?
I'd give that the lowest priority, execution speed IMHO is far more
important than download speed. After all, we're talking about web
applications, not web pages
11 matches
Mail list logo
