> I didn't hijacked anyone's thread.
That's a matter of opinion. In *my* opinion, not hijacking the thread
would have looked like this: "I'd really like to see a fix for bug
#1234 (error using update() on 'object' elements) in 1.6.0.3, it's a
serious problem." And, er, yes, that *would* have i
On Sep 22, 7:16 pm, Valentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't hijacked anyone's thread. This is about the upcoming 1.6.0.3
> so what I posted is directly related. The purpose of a JS library is
> to 1) provide compatibility among browsers using the same code 2)
> reduce the time the program
Valentin, it's common knowledge that the object tag is problematic,
that's a browser issue though not a high priority for any framework to
fix. That is why it's described as your 'pet' problem. You could have
googled around to find this out yourself and that would have given you
a number of fixes
I didn't hijacked anyone's thread. This is about the upcoming 1.6.0.3
so what I posted is directly related. The purpose of a JS library is
to 1) provide compatibility among browsers using the same code 2)
reduce the time the programmer has to spent to do certain tasks.
Also in today's day IE7 has
Couldn't have said it better myself. Thanks T.J.
Best,
Tobie
On Sep 7, 2:56 pm, "T.J. Crowder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I really don't know how to submit a
> > bug, or how to compile prototype. So if you want you can submit this
> > yourself ...
>
> Valentin, I'm not on the core team (or
> I really don't know how to submit a
> bug, or how to compile prototype. So if you want you can submit this
> yourself ...
Valentin, I'm not on the core team (or any Prototype team, although I
help moderate the user's discussion group), so I think I can say
this: It's all very well complaining
On Sep 6, 1:24 am, Valentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really seems weird that nobody in the world actually had to deal
> with $.update on an ... I really don't know how to submit a
> bug, or how to compile prototype. So if you want you can submit this
> yourself ...
Here's a bug tracker htt
Running this in my IE7 - the isnt even created. Its not a
problem with it not being able to extend, its that
getElementById('test') returns null, because IE doesnt actually create
the in the DOM. As such I dont really think this is a
prototype bug
Tom
--~--~-~--~~~--
I really seems weird that nobody in the world actually had to deal
with $.update on an ... I really don't know how to submit a
bug, or how to compile prototype. So if you want you can submit this
yourself ...
On Sep 5, 7:07 pm, kangax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 5, 8:03 pm, Valentin <[EM
On Sep 5, 8:03 pm, Valentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Save the above piece of code in a .htm file and run it in FIREFOX 3.0
> and IE 7. In FF 3 if we use stable 1.6.0.2 code works as expeected. In
> IE 7 it fails. The problem is that I cannot extend the tag
It does extend object eleme
I just tried it and the bug is still here (and there other bugs,
because the following simple code doesn't even work on Firefox with
the trunk version, it works just fine with the 1.6.0.2 stable)
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en">
Test IE Bug with Prototype 1.6.0.2
On Sep 5, 12:52 pm, Valentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone actually built a current version of the trunk? I have no
> idea how to do that (never used Ruby on Rails or anything like that)
I have uploaded a trunk snapshot as of today.
http://yura.thinkweb2.com/prototype_trunk_9_5_08.js
>
Has anyone actually built a current version of the trunk? I have no
idea how to do that (never used Ruby on Rails or anything like that)
and the incredibly annoying bugs in 1.6.0.2 just make me want to move
away from Prototype to JQuery.
For example, a simple bug (dunno if it was fixed or not) is
I'm committed to releasing 1.6.0.3 before The Ajax Experience at the
end of September. Obviously we'd like to release sooner, but both
Christophe and I will be attending that conference and presenting on
Prototype, so it behooves us to close some glaring bugs in 1.6.0.2.
The main problem is that
14 matches
Mail list logo
