Hi there,
Have a quick question - what is the most simple way to go about
"hiding" (or setting css display property to "none") a specific select
dropdown option by value?
For instance, say I have this:
One
Two
...
With the Prototype library, how can I modify the code below to "hide"
option
2009/3/9 RobG
>
>
>
> On Mar 10, 10:20 am, "Miguel Beltran R." wrote:
> > Hi list
> >
> > How can do it when I press automatic change to next field visible? the
> field
> > can be input=text or input=select.
>
> Use the tab key, it navitates through visible form controls by default
> - no script
On Mar 9, 9:50 am, webbear1000 wrote:
> I'm interested in your opinions on how I'm handling getters and
> setters in classes. Can you see any problems with my approach and what
> trouble might I be getting myself into?
>
> The huge body of my programming work has been with ASP.NET in VB and
> C#.
On Mar 10, 10:20 am, "Miguel Beltran R." wrote:
> Hi list
>
> How can do it when I press automatic change to next field visible? the field
> can be input=text or input=select.
Use the tab key, it navitates through visible form controls by default
- no script required.
--
Rob
--~--~-~
Hi list
How can do it when I press automatic change to next field visible? the field
can be input=text or input=select.
I have
Ejercicio
Seleciona una opcion
2008 (Saldo $1000.00)
Proyecto
Material
There's another, less bullet-proof solution, which involves catching
and stopping all click (an possibly keypress) events on links.
That would allow for a custom dialog.
You could always fallback on a regular alert for page refreshes and
the like.
Best,
Tobie
On Mar 9, 9:39 pm, Quleczka wrot
On Mar 9, 6:57 am, Jim Higson wrote:
> On Friday 06 March 2009 15:26:49 kangax wrote:
[...]
> > It's possible that we'll introduce a custom `hasOwnProperty` in later
> > revisions.
>
> Makes sense.
> if( !hasOwnProperty )
> hasOwnProperty = function hasOwnProperty(){ ... };
I was thinking of
My first thought was gmail scenario as well :)
Even google use just confirmation dialog...I've never seen any other
type - so I guess you have to live with it ;)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Proto
Hi,
I am looking to edit multiple fields simultaneously with the inplace
editor, I've only seen this accomplished on Basecamp so far and I'm
not entirely sure how's its done. Have spent a good hour Googling for
a tutorial on it, but can't find anything. Anyone know of one or is
anyone able to poi
Hi,
First of all I'm not prototype expert, rather newbie ;)
1) why do you use onsubmit="validatethis();"> if you can use $
('formlinks').observe('submit',validatethis);
2) you don't have to set asynchronous:true - it's default value
3) most common is parameters: $('formlinks').serialize(tru
Thank you so much for your response T.J.
I emailed my work friends the same question. It hit me yesterday. My
friend was like why don't you create your own window. Then I realized that
in showing and hiding divs we're just manipulating the dom and that like you
said the browser doesn't know to s
as additional info, I should mention:
there are multiple forms - tho with much different names
jQuery is also loaded which at first gave me conflicts, but
Ajax.Updater, at least, working now
the form giving me problem is itself loaded via Ajax.Updater - along
with (using eval) the script 'valid
Hi
I have a rather large complicated form that changes considerably based
on database content and user interaction - therefore, I said to
myself, I need to serialize ??
The whole is I wish to serialize form elements, pass them to php
(Admin/editmylinks2.php) - which would update database (worki
I want to create an autocompleter that uses HTML database storage.
What I'm intending to it modify Autocompleter.Local. My problem is
that I'm not sure how to fit these 2 pieces of code together:
>From Autocompleter:
getUpdatedChoices: function() {
this.updateChoices(this.options.selector(
OK, sorry
I found that I had posted to a different group on linkedin
Please forgive erroneous post - will be back for more if responses
from that group do not fix my prob...
Ben
On Mar 9, 9:07 am, Bhudda Ben wrote:
> well the post you indicated was a former one. I had posted a question
> abo
They must have unique IDs, or the page isn't valid and the code has no
chance at all of working (unless you need the current property of the
last one such).
When coding checkboxes, try this:
You don't have to use this format, I just find it easy.
Now you can get your collection of ch
reply thanks that worked I had to remember to add the quotes around my
response to make it a string. I'll also keep the calulation in mind if
I have any issues, so far all math is done in external programs and
sent back as a response.
On Mar 5, 8:15 pm, RobG wrote:
> On Mar 5, 7:50 am, Bob wrot
I am trying to determine if a series of checkboxes have been changed
on the screen. They all have the same ID of CODE, and different
values. the list is dynamic based on what was passed in to build the
screen. I have also setup a hidden div to store the inital valuse of
these checkboxes with and
I'm interested in your opinions on how I'm handling getters and
setters in classes. Can you see any problems with my approach and what
trouble might I be getting myself into?
The huge body of my programming work has been with ASP.NET in VB and
C#. So I'm used to classic OOP rather than prototype
Sorry for my unclear explanation, the following is all my JavaScript
code,
// script01.js //
obj = new Object();
obj.f1 = eventHandler;
window.onload = obj.f1;
window.onunload = function(){};
function eventHandler(){
postUpdater();
dynamicEdit();
deleteAlert();
v
well the post you indicated was a former one. I had posted a question
about forms on Wednesday, had at least three responses by Friday and
they were gone on Saturday. POSSIBLY, I posted my question somewhere
else - some other prototype group - but I don't think so since this is
the only group I
> With :self I could do:
>
> $(x).select(':self > .mixedcontent').each(...);
I don't have anything against ":self", but I don't see why $(x).select
("> .foo") shouldn't be legal syntax.
> Right now this is the shortest I came up with, and it's not as concise
> as I'm used to with Prototype:
Thank You guys for so much help, it saved me heaps of google time:)
I got much deeper insight how things work in js now.
"This is just how ECMAScript is designed - expression on a right hand
side of an assignment is not
aware of its left hand side "context". " - that already became tattoo
in my b
Hi all,
I have a problem using Ajax.Updater in Safari 3.2.
Whenever the response contains a large script tag (over 16k of JSON
data) it's not evaluated.
After some debugging I've find out that "extractScripts" doesn't find
the big script tag for some reason.
Currently I wrote a patch that just use
On Friday 06 March 2009 15:26:49 kangax wrote:
> On Mar 6, 5:49 am, Jim Higson wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 March 2009 23:22:26 Tobie Langel wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Extending Object.prototype is regarded as a Bad Thing[1].
> >
> > Does Prototype state anywhere that it doesn't work if Object.pro
Hello,
We are building a RESTful web client client in JS to use with our new
web API. We would like to use http basic auth but it seems that
Prototype does not support this out of the box. The strange thing is,
this bug was raised 2 years ago in Trac, and was labeled FIXED.
http://dev.rubyonrail
On Mar 6, 5:30 pm, SamuelXiao wrote:
> Hi, David, it seems that periodicalupdater send request first,
> breaking down the preview code
> setting new Ajax.Request. And the object is no longer refering to the
> gotopreview function.
> Because the firebug console returns the link that the
> perio
On 09.03.2009, at 01:44, Tobie Langel wrote:
> We'll be shifting to Sizzle pretty soon, which afaik allows (or could
> easily be modified to allow) both behaviours.
>
> Maybe we can make this opt-in for an upcoming release.
That would be great, I can see both use cases. I also see that
diffe
Hi,
> I realize that, but do you all think that this is the expected
> behavior?
Yes. To me, as Maarten pointed out, this:
$('foo').select('div.div_a > span.span_a')
is equivalent to this CSS selector:
#foo div.div_a > span.span_a
which says to select all "span_a" spans that are dir
29 matches
Mail list logo
