Jove,
I have a similar project (http://nlsmith.com/projects/prototype-asp/)
that is actively maintained and does about the same thing as Prototype
Essentials. I'm working on a 1.6.1 compatible release, and have
contacted the author of that library to possibly put these projects
together. This is
On Aug 6, 4:32 pm, mr_justin wrote:
> Don't call a method on an element unless it exists. This is a basic
> defensive coding technique.
He gets this. His question is about why he does not receive an
exception. I'm not sure, and now that I think about it, I may have had
the same problem.
Nicolas
Bertrand,
On Jun 5, 5:53 pm, Bertrand wrote:
> I was wondering if Prototype had something in store to deal with JSONP
> (my research online seems to indicate that it doesn't but you can
> never be sure).
You are correct that it does not include that functionality. I was
actually thinking of wri
Diodeus,
On Feb 20, 3:32 pm, Diodeus wrote:
> Hello Prototypers,
>
> I've been working on a JSON-based form generator that uses Prototype.
>
> Basically it allows you provide a form specification using JSON and
> the engine generates the output dynamically.
>
> It's still in the early stages but
Richard,
> What happens if you load prototype first?
I think it does the same thing no matter which order the scripts are
loaded.
Thanks,
Nathan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & script.
Jerod,
On Jan 25, 8:34 pm, Jerod Venema wrote:
> Not sure about the bug, but is there a reason you can't use the prototype
> JSON methods?
I've got a workaround in place, but I'm working on an app that doesn't
normally depend on Prototype.js, but breaks when it's there. There are
other componen
I'm using this code:
http://www.json.org/json2.js";>
https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/
prototype/1.6.0.3/prototype.js">
document.write(JSON.stringify([]));
Which will output null with the Prototype script tag. If that tag is
removed, the output is [], as I had expected. I beli
Geoff,
> 'afraid I'm not able to follow all you've written but could you just
> explain what you mean by "avoiding inline event handlers"?
>
> onClick="getData(this.form)">
>
> Would above have to be changed/replaced?
An inline event handler means you're putting scripts in html elements
instead
Cyrus,
On Jan 14, 1:50 am, Cyrus wrote:
> I am seeing myself copying the whole Sortable because it cannot be
> inherited.
I don't know if it's been mentioned, but you since Sortable is just an
object you could try extending it with your own methods like this
var MySortable = Object.extend({
On Nov 15, 11:12 am, buda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Look at this
> article:http://weblogs.asp.net/infinitiesloop/archive/2008/11/09/asp-net-ajax...
>
> may be its a good idea to be implemented in prototype core?
Take a look at LivePipe's Object.Event. It implements similar
functionality: http
10 matches
Mail list logo
