Hi,
I haven't been into the details of your specific situation, I just
happened to notice the suggestion to bind when using map and it jumped
out at me. But generally:
Say `this` points to an instance that has a flurgle property with the
value "bar". And so:
alert(this.flurgle);
...alerts "b
Jason.
How are you calling these functions ?
Are you using an tag by any chance
Alex Mcauley
http://www.thevacancymarket.com
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Frisvold"
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 9:17 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Div Fades
>
> Hi there,
>
> I'm using appe
I tried the first suggestion, but the function still isn't getting called.
TJ, can you explain more, or show an example of what the context param would
look like? Should I just put the doSlide function as the 2nd parameter?
-Andy
--
From: "T.J. C
Thanks, Colin, glad it was something like that.
-- T.J. :-)
On Aug 20, 5:43 pm, ColinFine wrote:
> On Aug 20, 9:39 am, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
>
> > Hi Colin,
>
> > > > > Incidentally (and not on topic for your question)
> > > > >
> > > > > is not valid in either HTML or XHTML.
>
> > > > It's v
Hi there,
I'm using appear and fade with a hidden div to display additional
information about data in a table. This all works wonderfully with one
caveat. Whenever the fade is called, the page jumps to the top, making
the user have to scroll back down again.
Am I doing somethin
I replied to you with an example.
I wrote
Bill
You need to observe the form submit.
$('the-id-of-the-form').observe('submit',function(event) {
/// do the ajax that TJ said...
Event.stop(event); // will stop it doing its default action!
});
Alex Mcauley
http://www.thevacanc
On Aug 20, 9:39 am, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> > > > Incidentally (and not on topic for your question)
> > > >
> > > > is not valid in either HTML or XHTML.
>
> > > It's valid XHTML for an empty table cell.
>
> > Wrong. It's a common misconception (which I had myself until
> > recen
Yes if your roundtrip is slow then doing it clientside can make it
seem more responsive. There is the issue though of what happens if the
server save fails? Revert your changes? Overall using serverside
output is less troublesome, easier to code, and more robust.
On 8/20/09, drewB wrote:
>
>>U
bill wrote:
> T.J. Crowder wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 'Tis indeed very easy. Say you have a form wrapped in a div:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> You can post it like so and take the result (which is presumed to be
>> an HTML snippet in this case) and use that to update the container:
>>
>> new
Bill
You need to observe the form submit.
$('the-id-of-the-form').observe('submit',function(event) {
/// do the ajax that TJ said...
Event.stop(event); // will stop it doing its default action!
});
Alex Mcauley
http://www.thevacancymarket.com
- Original Message -
From: bill
>Unlikely. There is very little difference in computation effort
>between generating JSON, XML, HTML or delimited text at the server.
I will have to take your word for this. I assumed it to be different.
>So why put it in two places? Why turn data into say JSON just so you
>can later turn it in
Tobie,
What's the issue #? I'm curious how Prototype can work around this
IE8 behavior...
Cheers,
-- T.J.
On Aug 20, 1:04 pm, Tobie Langel wrote:
> This is a Prototype bug and will be fixed in version 1.7.
>
> In the meantime, please use Object.toJSON(...) instead.
>
> Best,
>
> Tobie
>
> O
earlier on in the month i posted on how to do some things with Ajax
requests genericaly like adding a loading message to all requests and
i got a couple of responses but not many.
I've been giving it alot of thought and i cam up with addMethods as a
way to add some things to the Ajax Class...
Co
T.J. Crowder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 'Tis indeed very easy. Say you have a form wrapped in a div:
>
>
>
>
>
> You can post it like so and take the result (which is presumed to be
> an HTML snippet in this case) and use that to update the container:
>
> new Ajax.Updater('formwrapper
Hi,
I run this line :
Effect.multiple( tab, Effect.Scale);
There are no effect.
tab is an an array with two div elements.
I run this line
Effect.multiple( tab, Effect.Fade );
It's ok;
Why ?
Thanks,
Bernard
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
On Aug 20, 9:39 am, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> > > > Incidentally (and not on topic for your question)
> > > >
> > > > is not valid in either HTML or XHTML.
>
> > > It's valid XHTML for an empty table cell.
>
> > Wrong. It's a common misconception (which I had myself until
> > recen
Or better, yet, use an array.
On Aug 20, 2:06 pm, david wrote:
> Hi Buda,
>
> you can't rely on browser internal way to store JSON. Each as its own
> way.
> The only thing you can do is to call a sort() function but in that
> case you'll also loose original order.**
>
> One thing I can propose i
hi
Im using here ie 6 and it works. but, in ie
the dom is ready only when the document is loaded so sometimes refering to
an element is impossible before the dom is loaded.
try moving the function call to the onload:
On 8/20/09, david wrote:
>
>
> Hi Milko,
>
> which version of IE, because
Hi Milko,
which version of IE, because I test it with IE6, and it wotks.
--
david
On 18 août, 18:18, milko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I made an ajax-routine using request and json, which works fine under
> all browsers except under IE.
> For the sake of illustration I made a simplified version of thi
Hi Buda,
you can't rely on browser internal way to store JSON. Each as its own
way.
The only thing you can do is to call a sort() function but in that
case you'll also loose original order.**
One thing I can propose is to modify data to have an numerical index
to your data so calling a sort() fu
This is a Prototype bug and will be fixed in version 1.7.
In the meantime, please use Object.toJSON(...) instead.
Best,
Tobie
On Aug 20, 10:53 am, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wait! Stop the presses, are you saying IE8 has...a bug in it? ;-)
> (Oh, I shouldn't be mean to Microsoft, all br
I have a problem:
from server I receive such JSON string (resp.responseJSON.Data)
{
"Data":
{
"ABC": "6",
"NUI": "1",
"ITM": "10"
.
}
}
where elements in Data have the apropriate order
When I do $H(responseJSON.Data) - I have hash object with different
order of elemen
Hi,
Rather than binding it, use the second parameter to map (aka collect
[1]), that's what the second param ("context") is for. You'll find
that most of the Enumerable methods that take callbacks also take a
context parameter so the callback can be a method.
[1] http://prototypejs.org/api/enume
Hi,
In general, the correct thing is what the docs[1] say it is. Fade,
Appear, and most others are just functions, not constructor functions,
and so "new" is not correct. Some other things, like Effect.Opacity
[2] (which confusingly use *exactly* the same capitalization -- don't
shoot the messe
Hi,
Wait! Stop the presses, are you saying IE8 has...a bug in it? ;-)
(Oh, I shouldn't be mean to Microsoft, all browsers have bugs in them,
and they seem to have made quite an effort in IE8.)
Have you reported the bug to Microsoft?
Seriously, though, thank you for doing the research to why it
Hi,
Can you post a minimal, self-contained example[1] of the problem?
[1] http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/self-contained-test-page
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
Independent Software Engineer, consulting services available
On Aug 19, 2:39 pm, "Donnie Carvajal"
wrote:
> HI T.J.,
Hi Colin,
> > > Incidentally (and not on topic for your question)
> > >
> > > is not valid in either HTML or XHTML.
>
> > It's valid XHTML for an empty table cell.
>
> Wrong. It's a common misconception (which I had myself until
> recently).
If so, it's a misconception the W3C's own validator s
You need to re-observe the listeners
Perhaps a pastie of your code would help us help you..
Alex Mcauley
http://www.thevacancymarket.com
- Original Message -
From: "hass"
To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 12:19 AM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] onclick f
Hi,
When you replace an element, the old element is no longer displayed
(ideally it no longer exists) and a new element is put in its place.
Any event handlers associated with the old element are not
automatically transferred to the new one.
There are a couple of ways to handle this:
1. Event D
louis w wrote:
> Please check out the code below. I am having a hard time getting the
> protortype selectors to be applied to this item. Hoping to avoid
> having to use childNodes to parse this data.
>
> var xml = 'OK';
>
> var parser = new DOMParser();
>
I have set up a relatively straight forward scenario where i have a
listener for event A. On click of A (a button), I run an ajax request
to update a div B. B was a large div, representing one of 3 panels on
a page. B had some javascript functionality (lets call this event C)
inside of it which
new defines an new instance of an Object / class.
Some things dont need "new" and some do.
It has nothing to dow tih Cross browser afaik
Alex Mcauley
http://www.thevacancymarket.com
- Original Message -
From: "Mojito"
To: "Prototype & script.aculo.us"
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009
Andy Daykin wrote:
> Hello, I am having some difficulties writing a class, in my code I have a
> class where I need to be able to bind event listeners to values. In my code I
> want the variable pointerIndex to be accessible outside of the initialize
> function, but right now it is not. If I ma
33 matches
Mail list logo
