Some kind soul out there has created a form unserialize method (below)
that I would like to use. Being a newbie I can't figure out how to do
that.
My first kick at the can was
Object.extend(Form.Methods, Form.Methods.unserialize);
and to use it was:
$(form1).unserialize(form1,data)
but that
This is my first attempt at answering a question here, so use with
caution...
var max_Height = 0;
$$('.ddBox').each(function(dd) {
max_Height = Math.max(max_Height,
dd.select('ol').invoke('getHeight').max());
});
$$('.ddBox').invoke('setStyle',
would be any further ahead
speed wise. The only thing I can think of is to keep a count of how
many requests there are and when I've reached that many completions to
build the form. That sounds a little flaky though. Any ideas out
there? Thanks!
Greg
--
You received this message because you
Via Google search, I found this answer today here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/278122/how-to-force-javascript-to-execute-within-html-response-to-ajax-request
I have it half working. What I mean is, my response text comes back
and updates my div perfectly with the HTML when evalScripts:
Hi folks,
Is there a way using just new Element to create an Option element?
To get it to work in FF and IE, I need to do the following:
var o = new Element('Option', {'value': times[i], 'innerHTML':
times[i]}); // for IE
o.text = times[i]; // for FF
This doesn't work in FF:
var o = new
I don't often post here, but I've been using Prototype extensively for
the last 6 months. Not a day goes by when I don't say something to
myself along the lines of Thank God for Prototype. Perhaps, had I
started with J-Query, I'd have said the same thing about it - but I
didn't, and I'd like to
Hi,
Within my script I'd like to get a list of methods defined within in a
class created with Class.create().
If I do:
var c = new MyShinyNewClass()
console.log(c)
I get a nice breakdown of variables and methods, and firebug
differentiates the vars from the functions.
If I do:
for (m in c)
Doh!
Thank you folks for pointing out the astonishingly simple answer.
Sometimes I'm so stunned when something doesn't work, I don't see the
obvious.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send
The first parameter to bindAsEventListener is the context, then come
the arguments.
So I think you can just get rid of e in line
function fetchData(e, jsonData), giving:
function fetchData(jsonData)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype
I think we'd all love to see Prototype be more popular, but does it
really matter? It's here, it works, it works well and it's a great
base on which to build complex apps. If the developers decide to not
make any more upgrades we'd still have a great tool. I think of it as
a house foundation
I've also written an API in Prototype, and I know it will be used in
jQuery shops. I hope to not run into people not willing to make a few
easy search/replace changes. It would be nice if there was a way for
Prototype to not conflict.
On Sep 20, 3:14 pm, kstubs kst...@gmail.com wrote:
I've
Wouldn't that be as easy as a search and replace of $( in
Prototype.js?
You could always trying changing $( to Proto( and give it a whirl.
But, any 3rd party stuff you have would need the same change.
On Sep 21, 11:38 am, kstubs kst...@gmail.com wrote:
Specifically: How difficult would it be to
Make sure Scriptaculous is loaded, then it's simply
Effect.ScrollTo(element);
But, if the iFrame isn't as tall as the page height, you may not get
the top of the iFrame to the top of the page. It can't scroll beyond
the end of the page content.
--
You received this message because you are
Here's a little routine I use. The server sends back some minimal JSON
code that I extract from the iframe that the upload form was posted to.
This is a condensed version. If you need more of the code (html/js), let
me know.
If there's a more prototype-y way to do
Off the top of my head, I think the target of your form should be the id of
the iframe.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Hi everyone, I am new at programming and I cannot figure out how to
get the Autocomplete's keyboard functionality to work correctly. I am
able to get Autocomplete function but when you hit the up and down
arrow, the select does not change. Could someone take a look at my
code and point out what I
I actually was able to figure it out, It was actually working the
whole time. If you add this bit of CSS
code li.selected { background: teal ;color: black; } /code
you can see what is actually see what is selected.
Greg
On Jun 10, 3:47 pm, Greg Militello greg.milite...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
17 matches
Mail list logo
