IE has lots of memory links, particularly when you have two-way references
between js objects and dom nodes. Because of a bug, it never gets properly
garbage collected.
HTH,
Jim
On Friday 23 October 2009 12:13:57 Etha wrote:
None can help me?
On 22 Ott, 14:59, Etha ev.distef...@gmail.com
On Tuesday 20 October 2009 01:12:43 Motig wrote:
check these line numbers and add the semicolons there so the web
compressors and minifiers will work
FWIW, yuicompressor handles 1.6.1 without issue. It gets very good compression
and has a proper JS parser (from Rhino) so it is very safe.
--
On Wednesday 14 October 2009 18:01:46 Christophe Decaux wrote:
I don't know anything what elegant means, but this would be my way to
do it.
I'm your onclick handler, set a flag such as menuIsClicked to true and
in your onMouseOut handler, test that flag before hiding the image.
On to the
On Monday 05 October 2009 13:13:13 Alex Mcauley wrote:
Afternoon peoples, hope everyone had a good weekend.
Got a sligt problem... I have been developing a new app that needs an
iframe to upload an image...
All of this is done and working properly but i need to use some
prototypejs
we'll be using sane logic to
build our code.
I hope you are right.
*suspense*
On Sep 16, 3:43 pm, Jim Higson j...@wikizzle.org wrote:
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 14:43:32 skaiuoquer wrote:
A non-cached medium page on it takes above half a minute to load
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 14:43:32 skaiuoquer wrote:
A non-cached medium page on it takes above half a minute to load on
T1...
That's half a minute where the user is pretty much waiting for the JS
files to download one after the other.
Concatenate all files into one in the order that
On Thursday 03 September 2009 06:51:19 kangax wrote:
On Sep 2, 2:23 pm, Mojito tokyot...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the Prototyped syntax equivalent of:
window.frames['iFrameID'].document.getElementById
('elementInsideIFrame');
Current version of Prototype doesn't really support
Hi,
As some background, under Moz, Prototype adds to Element.prototype (I think
this is correct, I haven't checked the source) the methods become available on
every Element. On IE, Prototype can't extend Element.prototype so it wraps the
element instead.
This gets more complicated when you
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 14:06:17 kangax wrote:
It's possible that we'll introduce a custom `hasOwnProperty` in
later revisions.
Makes sense.
if( !hasOwnProperty )
hasOwnProperty = function hasOwnProperty(){ ... };
I was thinking of something like:
var
to Wikipedia the last version was 2.0.4, released 13th January 2006
and was replaced with 3.0.0 on the 11th June 2007.
[1] http://erik.eae.net/archives/2005/06/06/22.13.54/
On Mar 5, 6:34 pm, Jim Higson j...@wikizzle.org wrote:
On Thursday 05 March 2009 16:16:05 Jim Higson wrote:
Hi
Hi,
Is anybody else finding this? Does Prototype from git work with FF3.1?
Thanks,
Jim
--
Jim
my wiki ajaxification thing: http://wikizzle.org
my blog: http://jimhigson.blogspot.com/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to
On Thursday 05 March 2009 16:16:05 Jim Higson wrote:
Hi,
Is anybody else finding this? Does Prototype from git work with FF3.1?
On closer inspection, it is quite easy to get Prototype to throw similar
errors even in FF3. It just happens that my present code only provokes it in
3.1
Hi,
There are Sinusoidal transitions and Reverse (linear) transitions - is there a
way to get a reverse Sinusoidal?
Thanks,
Jim
--
Jim
my wiki ajaxification thing: http://wikizzle.org
my blog: http://jimhigson.blogspot.com/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 15:53:08 Brendan O Connor wrote:
run the the same function again using -xCo
I use the following
moveRight : function(mvePan,xCo){
menuFrag.scrollCnt = menuFrag.scrollCnt + 1;
new Effect.Move(mvePan, {duration: .5,
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 16:18:37 Jim Higson wrote:
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 15:53:08 Brendan O Connor wrote:
run the the same function again using -xCo
I use the following
moveRight : function(mvePan,xCo){
menuFrag.scrollCnt = menuFrag.scrollCnt + 1
On Sunday 15 February 2009 11:09:28 timbob wrote:
The problem is that you are triggering a mousemove event _every_ time
you move the mouse within the div, and every single time you create
a Move effect.
So when you leave the div there is a mouseout event and also the
mousemove event from
How about putting the scrollto in a queue, and checking that the scrollto
queue is empty before doing the mouseover effect?
I assume the mouseover effect is javascript? If it is css, you could add a
class to the body while the scrolling is running (or somewhere else high in
the tree) and have
On Wednesday 11 February 2009 05:06:55 RobG wrote:
The language is designed so you shouldn't need to care. I think this
helps the argument of why functions like isString are not a good
idea. If you want to test for specific properties or features of an
object, test for them. Don't test
On Feb 8, 1:19 pm, RobG rg...@iinet.net.au wrote:
On Feb 8, 12:55 am, Jim Higson j...@333.org wrote:
alert( Object.isString( foo ));
// alerts string
It alerts true.
So it does ^-)
alert( Object.isString( new String( foo ) ));
// alerts object
It alerts false.
^-) again
I know
Ha. I'm relatively new to JS and I though that ...
var s_String = bob;
was just a shortcut for
var s_LooksLikeAStringButDoesNotGoQuack = new String(bob);
I always thought that internally they were the same thing.
I think a lot of people who used Javascript for a long time think the
What does new String(bob) offer over normal bob?
As far as I know, nothing. Hence my assertion that Prototype should
treat object strings as if they were a normal string.
Hmmm... actually I should have said nothing I've ever found
useful :-)
With
and Prototype should make stuff like this easier. It should
return string regardless of how the string was created.
Anyone agree I should file this as a bug, or is there a good reason the
current behaviour is desirable?
Cheers,
Jim
--
Jim Higson
my blog: http://jimhigson.blogspot.com/
wikizzle
Might be of interest to the list: I just wrote a blog post about a bit of
Prototype Singleton code I wrote.
Find it here:
http://jimhigson.blogspot.com/2009/01/prototype-singleton-classes.html
Jim
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
23 matches
Mail list logo
