Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: enumerate hash

2010-04-14 Thread Christophe Decaux
I'm sorry, but I don't understand your questions.

Maybe I can explain what these lines say:
1- this is a loop, like :   "Take every pair of the Hash referenced as 
HashtoBeTested" 
Remember that a Hash is a collection of pairs. Each pair is composed of a key 
and a value  
2- for every pair, compare the value of the pair with ValueToTest
3- if they are equal, then remove this pair from the Hash
For such a removal, you have to identify the pair by its key, and not by its 
value

Hope this helps,

Le 14 avr. 2010 à 15:38, chrysanthe m a écrit :

> Hi Christophe
> Thanks, but is there anything more to the syntax.  Also how do you use that 
> optional context parameter with this within the loop and for what enhanced 
> value/processing does it give you?
> 
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Christophe Decaux 
>  wrote:
> If I understand well, what you're asking for is pretty close to what you 
> suggested in your original post:
> 
> hashToBeTested.each(function(pair){
>   if(valueToTest==pair.value){
> hashToBeTested.unset(pair.key);
>   }
> }
> 
> 
> Christophe
> 
> Le 10 avr. 2010 à 12:36, chrysanthe m a écrit :
> 
>> Hi, again
>> Sorry for being obtuse.  But can someone help me and even understand how to 
>> write a function and call it on a hash that will take a value, compare it 
>> against each of the keys in the hash, on match delete the key/value, and 
>> return the hash.  tia.
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:24 PM, chrysanthe m  wrote:
>> Hi Alex
>> Thanks, but a newbie here so that was "drinking at a firehose".  Let me 
>> parse it to better understand.
>> First can you really invoke on two separate enumerable objects with that 
>> [n,n1,n2] syntax?  That is tremendous.
>> My problem is I need to first check the presence of a key before I unset it 
>> b/c I found out unset-ing a non-existent key seems to zero the struct; also 
>> it is more courteous, grin.  So how would I construct the and parameterize 
>> the annonymous function to do the check and if present "do it to itself".  
>> Ideally I would like to pass in the enumerable, call the function and return 
>> the modified(or not) enumerable in the function's return.  
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Alex Wallace  wrote:
>> Ah, I see. You can handle this using Enumerable's invoke. This code should 
>> make it clear:
>> 
>> a = new Hash({ x : "foo", y : "bar" });
>> b = new Hash({ x : "zam", y : "moof" });
>> a.get("x");
>>   "foo"
>> b.get("x");
>>   "zam"
>> [a,b].invoke("get","x");
>>   ["foo", "zam"]
>> [a,b].invoke("unset","x")
>>   ["foo", "zam"]
>> a.get("x")
>>   (undefined)
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Alex
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:24 PM, chrysanthe m  wrote:
>> Sorry sudden send resume in this reply
>> 
>> Hello
>> I am having a difficult time trying to enumerate a hash to determine if a 
>> give key is in the hash and if so delete it and its value.
>> If I could approach it index it would be 
>> function remove(valueToTest, hashToBeTested){
>>for(i=0;i>   if(valueToTest==hashToBeTested[i]) hashToBeTested.unset(valueToTest);
>>}
>> 
>> Would I do it like
>> 
>> hashToBeTested.each(function(valueToTest){
>>   if(valueToTest==this)hashToBeTested.unset(valueToTest);
>>   },hashToBeTested);
>> return hashToBeTested;
>> 
>> 
>> which I am sure is wrong syntactically if not semantically.  Can someone 
>> guide the proper way and more deeply the use of this?
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:06 PM, chrysanthe m  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to 
>> prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to 
>> prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to 
>> prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
> To 

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: enumerate hash

2010-04-14 Thread chrysanthe m
Hi Christophe
Thanks, but is there anything more to the syntax.  Also how do you use that
optional context parameter with this within the loop and for what enhanced
value/processing does it give you?

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Christophe Decaux <
christophe.dec...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If I understand well, what you're asking for is pretty close to what you
> suggested in your original post:
>
> hashToBeTested.each(function(pair){
>   if(valueToTest==pair.value){
> hashToBeTested.unset(pair.key);
>   }
> }
>
>
> Christophe
>
> Le 10 avr. 2010 à 12:36, chrysanthe m a écrit :
>
> Hi, again
> Sorry for being obtuse.  But can someone help me and even understand how to
> write a function and call it on a hash that will take a value, compare it
> against each of the keys in the hash, on match delete the key/value, and
> return the hash.  tia.
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:24 PM, chrysanthe m wrote:
>
>> Hi Alex
>> Thanks, but a newbie here so that was "drinking at a firehose".  Let me
>> parse it to better understand.
>> First can you really invoke on two separate enumerable objects with that
>> [n,n1,n2] syntax?  That is tremendous.
>> My problem is I need to first check the presence of a key before I unset
>> it b/c I found out unset-ing a non-existent key seems to zero the struct;
>> also it is more courteous, grin.  So how would I construct the and
>> parameterize the annonymous function to do the check and if present "do it
>> to itself".  Ideally I would like to pass in the enumerable, call the
>> function and return the modified(or not) enumerable in the function's
>> return.
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Alex Wallace wrote:
>>
>>> Ah, I see. You can handle this using Enumerable's invoke. This code
>>> should make it clear:
>>>
>>> a = new Hash({ x : "foo", y : "bar" });
>>> b = new Hash({ x : "zam", y : "moof" });
>>> a.get("x");
>>>   "foo"
>>> b.get("x");
>>>   "zam"
>>> [a,b].invoke("get","x");
>>>   ["foo", "zam"]
>>> [a,b].invoke("unset","x")
>>>   ["foo", "zam"]
>>> a.get("x")
>>>   (undefined)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>  On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:24 PM, chrysanthe m wrote:
>>>
  Sorry sudden send resume in this reply

 Hello
 I am having a difficult time trying to enumerate a hash to determine if
 a give key is in the hash and if so delete it and its value.
 If I could approach it index it would be
 function remove(valueToTest, hashToBeTested){
for(i=0;i>>>   if(valueToTest==hashToBeTested[i])
 hashToBeTested.unset(valueToTest);
}

 Would I do it like

 hashToBeTested.each(function(valueToTest){
   if(valueToTest==this)hashToBeTested.unset(valueToTest);
   },hashToBeTested);
 return hashToBeTested;


 which I am sure is wrong syntactically if not semantically.  Can someone
 guide the proper way and more deeply the use of this?


 On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:06 PM, chrysanthe m wrote:

>
>


 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
 To post to this group, send email to
 prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>> prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous

Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: enumerate hash

2010-04-12 Thread Christophe Decaux
If I understand well, what you're asking for is pretty close to what you 
suggested in your original post:

hashToBeTested.each(function(pair){
  if(valueToTest==pair.value){
hashToBeTested.unset(pair.key);
  }
}


Christophe

Le 10 avr. 2010 à 12:36, chrysanthe m a écrit :

> Hi, again
> Sorry for being obtuse.  But can someone help me and even understand how to 
> write a function and call it on a hash that will take a value, compare it 
> against each of the keys in the hash, on match delete the key/value, and 
> return the hash.  tia.
> 
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:24 PM, chrysanthe m  wrote:
> Hi Alex
> Thanks, but a newbie here so that was "drinking at a firehose".  Let me parse 
> it to better understand.
> First can you really invoke on two separate enumerable objects with that 
> [n,n1,n2] syntax?  That is tremendous.
> My problem is I need to first check the presence of a key before I unset it 
> b/c I found out unset-ing a non-existent key seems to zero the struct; also 
> it is more courteous, grin.  So how would I construct the and parameterize 
> the annonymous function to do the check and if present "do it to itself".  
> Ideally I would like to pass in the enumerable, call the function and return 
> the modified(or not) enumerable in the function's return.  
> 
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Alex Wallace  wrote:
> Ah, I see. You can handle this using Enumerable's invoke. This code should 
> make it clear:
> 
> a = new Hash({ x : "foo", y : "bar" });
> b = new Hash({ x : "zam", y : "moof" });
> a.get("x");
>   "foo"
> b.get("x");
>   "zam"
> [a,b].invoke("get","x");
>   ["foo", "zam"]
> [a,b].invoke("unset","x")
>   ["foo", "zam"]
> a.get("x")
>   (undefined)
> 
> Cheers,
> Alex
> 
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:24 PM, chrysanthe m  wrote:
> Sorry sudden send resume in this reply
> 
> Hello
> I am having a difficult time trying to enumerate a hash to determine if a 
> give key is in the hash and if so delete it and its value.
> If I could approach it index it would be 
> function remove(valueToTest, hashToBeTested){
>for(i=0;i   if(valueToTest==hashToBeTested[i]) hashToBeTested.unset(valueToTest);
>}
> 
> Would I do it like
> 
> hashToBeTested.each(function(valueToTest){
>   if(valueToTest==this)hashToBeTested.unset(valueToTest);
>   },hashToBeTested);
> return hashToBeTested;
> 
> 
> which I am sure is wrong syntactically if not semantically.  Can someone 
> guide the proper way and more deeply the use of this?
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:06 PM, chrysanthe m  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.



[Proto-Scripty] Re: enumerate hash

2010-04-11 Thread RobG


On Apr 10, 8:36 pm, chrysanthe m  wrote:
> Hi, again
> Sorry for being obtuse.  But can someone help me and even understand how to
> write a function and call it on a hash that will take a value, compare it
> against each of the keys in the hash, on match delete the key/value, and
> return the hash.  tia.

Consider using a plain object:

  var o = {foo:'foo', bar:'bar'};

  function removeProperty(obj, prop) {

if (prop in obj) {
  delete obj[prop];
} else {
  return prop + ' not in object';
}
  }

  alert(o.foo);

  removeProperty(o, 'foo');

  alert(o.foo);


No need to "return" the object, it is modified in place.


--
Rob

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.



Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: enumerate hash

2010-04-10 Thread chrysanthe m
Hi, again
Sorry for being obtuse.  But can someone help me and even understand how to
write a function and call it on a hash that will take a value, compare it
against each of the keys in the hash, on match delete the key/value, and
return the hash.  tia.

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:24 PM, chrysanthe m  wrote:

> Hi Alex
> Thanks, but a newbie here so that was "drinking at a firehose".  Let me
> parse it to better understand.
> First can you really invoke on two separate enumerable objects with that
> [n,n1,n2] syntax?  That is tremendous.
> My problem is I need to first check the presence of a key before I unset it
> b/c I found out unset-ing a non-existent key seems to zero the struct; also
> it is more courteous, grin.  So how would I construct the and parameterize
> the annonymous function to do the check and if present "do it to itself".
> Ideally I would like to pass in the enumerable, call the function and return
> the modified(or not) enumerable in the function's return.
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Alex Wallace wrote:
>
>> Ah, I see. You can handle this using Enumerable's invoke. This code should
>> make it clear:
>>
>> a = new Hash({ x : "foo", y : "bar" });
>> b = new Hash({ x : "zam", y : "moof" });
>> a.get("x");
>>   "foo"
>> b.get("x");
>>   "zam"
>> [a,b].invoke("get","x");
>>   ["foo", "zam"]
>> [a,b].invoke("unset","x")
>>   ["foo", "zam"]
>> a.get("x")
>>   (undefined)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Alex
>>
>>  On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:24 PM, chrysanthe m wrote:
>>
>>>  Sorry sudden send resume in this reply
>>>
>>> Hello
>>> I am having a difficult time trying to enumerate a hash to determine if a
>>> give key is in the hash and if so delete it and its value.
>>> If I could approach it index it would be
>>> function remove(valueToTest, hashToBeTested){
>>>for(i=0;i>>   if(valueToTest==hashToBeTested[i])
>>> hashToBeTested.unset(valueToTest);
>>>}
>>>
>>> Would I do it like
>>>
>>> hashToBeTested.each(function(valueToTest){
>>>   if(valueToTest==this)hashToBeTested.unset(valueToTest);
>>>   },hashToBeTested);
>>> return hashToBeTested;
>>>
>>>
>>> which I am sure is wrong syntactically if not semantically.  Can someone
>>> guide the proper way and more deeply the use of this?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:06 PM, chrysanthe m wrote:
>>>


>>>
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>> prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.



Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: enumerate hash

2010-04-08 Thread chrysanthe m
Hi Alex
Thanks, but a newbie here so that was "drinking at a firehose".  Let me
parse it to better understand.
First can you really invoke on two separate enumerable objects with that
[n,n1,n2] syntax?  That is tremendous.
My problem is I need to first check the presence of a key before I unset it
b/c I found out unset-ing a non-existent key seems to zero the struct; also
it is more courteous, grin.  So how would I construct the and parameterize
the annonymous function to do the check and if present "do it to itself".
Ideally I would like to pass in the enumerable, call the function and return
the modified(or not) enumerable in the function's return.

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Alex Wallace wrote:

> Ah, I see. You can handle this using Enumerable's invoke. This code should
> make it clear:
>
> a = new Hash({ x : "foo", y : "bar" });
> b = new Hash({ x : "zam", y : "moof" });
> a.get("x");
>   "foo"
> b.get("x");
>   "zam"
> [a,b].invoke("get","x");
>   ["foo", "zam"]
> [a,b].invoke("unset","x")
>   ["foo", "zam"]
> a.get("x")
>   (undefined)
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:24 PM, chrysanthe m wrote:
>
>> Sorry sudden send resume in this reply
>>
>> Hello
>> I am having a difficult time trying to enumerate a hash to determine if a
>> give key is in the hash and if so delete it and its value.
>> If I could approach it index it would be
>> function remove(valueToTest, hashToBeTested){
>>for(i=0;i>   if(valueToTest==hashToBeTested[i])
>> hashToBeTested.unset(valueToTest);
>>}
>>
>> Would I do it like
>>
>> hashToBeTested.each(function(valueToTest){
>>   if(valueToTest==this)hashToBeTested.unset(valueToTest);
>>   },hashToBeTested);
>> return hashToBeTested;
>>
>>
>> which I am sure is wrong syntactically if not semantically.  Can someone
>> guide the proper way and more deeply the use of this?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:06 PM, chrysanthe m wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.



Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: enumerate hash

2010-04-08 Thread Alex Wallace
Ah, I see. You can handle this using Enumerable's invoke. This code should
make it clear:

a = new Hash({ x : "foo", y : "bar" });
b = new Hash({ x : "zam", y : "moof" });
a.get("x");
  "foo"
b.get("x");
  "zam"
[a,b].invoke("get","x");
  ["foo", "zam"]
[a,b].invoke("unset","x")
  ["foo", "zam"]
a.get("x")
  (undefined)

Cheers,
Alex

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:24 PM, chrysanthe m  wrote:

> Sorry sudden send resume in this reply
>
> Hello
> I am having a difficult time trying to enumerate a hash to determine if a
> give key is in the hash and if so delete it and its value.
> If I could approach it index it would be
> function remove(valueToTest, hashToBeTested){
>for(i=0;i   if(valueToTest==hashToBeTested[i]) hashToBeTested.unset(valueToTest);
>}
>
> Would I do it like
>
> hashToBeTested.each(function(valueToTest){
>   if(valueToTest==this)hashToBeTested.unset(valueToTest);
>   },hashToBeTested);
> return hashToBeTested;
>
>
> which I am sure is wrong syntactically if not semantically.  Can someone
> guide the proper way and more deeply the use of this?
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 3:06 PM, chrysanthe m wrote:
>
>>
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
> To post to this group, send email to
> prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.



[Proto-Scripty] Re: enumerate hash

2010-04-08 Thread chrysanthe m
Sorry sudden send resume in this reply
Hello
I am having a difficult time trying to enumerate a hash to determine if a
give key is in the hash and if so delete it and its value.
If I could approach it index it would be
function remove(valueToTest, hashToBeTested){
   for(i=0;i wrote:

>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype & script.aculo.us" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.