RE: Apple's initial response

[mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chris Norman Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 3:16 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Apple's initial response Well, the reason I mention Avid is simple. If Apple start looking at the flood of reports about the same bug, all pertaining to Pro

Re: Apple's initial response

weeks and while PT might be overkill it is still pretty good. grin From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chris Norman Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 3:16 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Apple's initial response Well

Re: Apple's initial response

Hello Slau, Now I found the time to visit the site, you mentioned. I found something confusing: If I click the link mentioned below and search for a heading for Pro Tools 10 and Mountain Lion or so and read along, I can click the following link for more information:

Re: Apple's initial response

The problem is that there are a bunch of out-of-date pages that people mistakenly view. The link I sent shows 10.8 as being supported. Just come back with the link I supplied. best, Slau On Nov 14, 2012, at 8:08 AM, Stefan Albertshauser wrote: Hello Slau, Now I found the time to visit

Apple's initial response

Apple's initial response to me was as follows: Thank you for your email. Apple relies on each application developer to properly implement the necessary components into their applications that allow VoiceOver to work correctly. Unfortunately AVID has not provided an update for ProTools

Re: Apple's initial response

Hello. With that response in context, I am wondering, does Apple follow their own guide lines to make Logic pro accessible with Voice over? Nektarios. On Nov 13, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote: Apple's initial response to me was as follows: Thank you for your

Re: Apple's initial response

sniffing, honey pot open relay servers or an honest mistake caused a transmission error, please advise the sender and throw your laptop into a bubble bath to avoid all illicit data retention. On 14/11/2012, at 6:36 AM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote: Apple's initial response to me

Re: Apple's initial response

under Snow Leopard or Lion the items are spoken right? thanks, Ronald Op 13 nov. 2012, om 18:36 heeft Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com het volgende geschreven: Apple's initial response to me was as follows: Thank you for your email. Apple relies on each application developer to properly

Re: Apple's initial response

or an honest mistake caused a transmission error, please advise the sender and throw your laptop into a bubble bath to avoid all illicit data retention. On 14/11/2012, at 6:36 AM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote: Apple's initial response to me was as follows: Thank you for your

Re: Apple's initial response

Leopard or Lion the items are spoken right? thanks, Ronald Op 13 nov. 2012, om 18:36 heeft Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com het volgende geschreven: Apple's initial response to me was as follows: Thank you for your email. Apple relies on each application developer to properly implement

Re: Apple's initial response

folks, Be prepared for a canned response from Apple. They will probably try to send you an outdated link to a page on Avid's web site that shows Pro Tools as not being compatible with Mountain Lion. Shoot back the following link:

Re: Apple's initial response

or Lion the items are spoken right? thanks, Ronald Op 13 nov. 2012, om 18:36 heeft Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com het volgende geschreven: Apple's initial response to me was as follows: Thank you for your email. Apple relies on each application developer to properly implement

Re: Apple's initial response

initial response Apple's initial response to me was as follows: Thank you for your email. Apple relies on each application developer to properly implement the necessary components into their applications that allow VoiceOver to work correctly. Unfortunately AVID has not provided an update

Re: Apple's initial response

...@gmail.com To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 12:36 PM Subject: Apple's initial response Apple's initial response to me was as follows: Thank you for your email. Apple relies on each application developer to properly implement the necessary components

Re: Apple's initial response

, honey pot open relay servers or an honest mistake caused a transmission error, please advise the sender and throw your laptop into a bubble bath to avoid all illicit data retention. On 14/11/2012, at 6:36 AM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote: Apple's initial response to me

Re: Apple's initial response

your laptop into a bubble bath to avoid all illicit data retention. On 14/11/2012, at 6:36 AM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote: Apple's initial response to me was as follows: Thank you for your email. Apple relies on each application developer to properly implement the necessary

Re: Apple's initial response

- From: Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 12:36 PM Subject: Apple's initial response Apple's initial response to me was as follows: Thank you for your email. Apple relies on each application developer to properly

Re: Apple's initial response

correctly under Mountain Lion while with the same version of pro Tools under Snow Leopard or Lion the items are spoken right? thanks, Ronald Op 13 nov. 2012, om 18:36 heeft Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com het volgende geschreven: Apple's initial response to me was as follows: Thank

Re: Apple's initial response

such as ip sniffing, honey pot open relay servers or an honest mistake caused a transmission error, please advise the sender and throw your laptop into a bubble bath to avoid all illicit data retention. On 14/11/2012, at 6:36 AM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote: Apple's initial

Re: Apple's initial response

sparingly): 980-272-8570 - Original Message - From: Chris Norman chris.norm...@googlemail.com To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 3:28 PM Subject: Re: Apple's initial response Just out of interest, are Avid willing to disclose what kind of control they use

Re: Apple's initial response

Antoine Decaux To: Pro Tools Accessibility Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 3:40 PM Subject: Re: Apple's initial response Hey Scott, I think you guys should try to pinpoint the issue ui elements with the accessibility inspector that's bundled with x-code. At least you can see what part

Re: Apple's initial response

- Original Message - From: Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 3:45 PM Subject: Re: Apple's initial response Don't mention that someone from Apple said to contact the accessibility team. That's irrelevant. It's here say as far

Re: Apple's initial response

, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote: Apple's initial response to me was as follows: Thank you for your email. Apple relies on each application developer to properly implement the necessary components into their applications that allow VoiceOver to work correctly. Unfortunately AVID has

Re: Apple's initial response

and throw your laptop into a bubble bath to avoid all illicit data retention. On 14/11/2012, at 6:36 AM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote: Apple's initial response to me was as follows: Thank you for your email. Apple relies on each application developer to properly implement the necessary

Re: Apple's initial response

): 980-272-8570 - Original Message - From: Slau Halatyn To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 5:06 PM Subject: Re: Apple's initial response Please, forget about Avid. As I said several times, this has nothing to do with them. Focus on Apple

Re: Apple's initial response

retention. On 14/11/2012, at 6:36 AM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote: Apple's initial response to me was as follows: Thank you for your email. Apple relies on each application developer to properly implement the necessary components into their applications that allow