Re: Digi 003

ok. i’ve only come in half way through this thread. I have the m c u pro. I’ve not yet tried to use it to alter plugging settings. Just something i’ve not yet got around to doing. How ever are you saying that without the flip to fader mode, i will not be able to change any plugging settings

Re: Digi 003

Hi Steve, You should still be able to access parameters but they simply wouldn't be mapped to the faders but rather the encoder knobs. The nice thing about fader flip mode is that you have a tactile representation of the parameter values and can easily detect switches because they're either

Re: Digi 003

yes. that sounds like it would make things very easy to work out what’s happening in the plug. Thanks for the info. Steve > On 9 Feb 2016, at 5:28 am, Slau Halatyn wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > You should still be able to access parameters but they simply wouldn't be >

Re: Digi 003

So to recap, going to mention logic Pro X here. My purpose in purchasing a 003 was to use it in ProTools 11 or 12 and also to be able to bounce over to logic Pro X. If we are to use flip mode it will not work unless we have an avid product specifically for ProTools. If you have that then it

Re: Digi 003

That's a serious limitation and, I'd say, a deal breaker. The behavior I described is the way it works on the 003 so I figured it would be the same on the MCU. Too bad. Slau On Feb 5, 2016, at 5:03 PM, mcdiemert . wrote: > For anyone following this thread as it pertains

Re: Digi 003

Agreed, I use mainly UAD plugs so I haven't had an extreme need for my MCU while working in plugs, but since I was borrowing this unit for the past 10 months, I think I'll move on to a different surface, when this project is complete. On 2/5/16, Slau Halatyn wrote: >

Re: Digi 003

For anyone following this thread as it pertains to fader flip on the MCU Pro from Mackie, below is the response I received from Mackie support, and unfortunately confirms the limitations I've suspected while using this surface. Hi Matthew, Thanks for writing! Unfortunately with using the

Re: Digi 003

I was wrong Kevin it is not fadeer flip. He was making parameter changes with the V pot on the control surface. Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 > On Feb 3, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Kevin Reeves wrote: > > hi Ricky. > > On this issue of Fader Flip. Could you possibly locate that video

Re: Digi 003

an almost must have for any interface that I consider. Well, >>> thanks for the info, I will have to check out some sound demos on YouTube >>> and see if I can get a feel for the overall sound quality. >>> -Original Message- >>> From: ptaccess@googlegroup

Re: Digi 003

hi Ricky. On this issue of Fader Flip. Could you possibly locate that video you found on youtube, or tell me what the title of it might have been so I can dig it up? I'm talking with Matt off list and I want to try and get this sorted for all of us. Thanks so m,uch. Kevin -- You received

Re: Digi 003

have for any interface that I >>>> consider. Well, thanks for the info, I will have to check out some sound >>>> demos on YouTube and see if I can get a feel for the overall sound >>>> quality. >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: ptaccess@googl

Re: Digi 003

uality. -Original Message- From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of TheOreoMonster Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 8:40 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Digi 003 Yeah it was down to the ONYX and A for me. I went with the A cuz its did 18

Re: Digi 003

ter > Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 8:40 PM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: Digi 003 > > Yeah it was down to the ONYX and A for me. I went with the A cuz its did > 18 by 18 instead of the mackie which only was 16 by 16. and actually the > A can do 26

Re: Digi 003

ouTube and see if I can > get a feel for the overall sound quality. > -Original Message- > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of TheOreoMonster > Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 8:40 PM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subj

Re: Digi 003

ting something else if >>>> I could justify it. The thing with the 003 is that even though it is rock >>>> solid on PT, it doesn't seem to be as user friendly on other daws, the >>>> problem with the onyx is that it is not considered a full surface,. >>>> &

Re: Digi 003

an get a feel for the overall sound quality. >> -Original Message- >> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf >> Of TheOreoMonster >> Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 8:40 PM >> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com >> Subject

Re: Digi 003

That is about what I would do with it. Except I wouldn't want it to move parameters on an EQ I just like to have that Fater in my hand it is ear to hand type thing. Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 > On Feb 1, 2016, at 6:16 PM, Matt Diemert wrote: > > I used a Maki extensively

Re: Digi 003

Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, and actually I would love to be wrong, but as far as in ProTools with the controller, I am only able to manipulate plug-ins using the rotary pots. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 1, 2016, at 6:36 PM, Ricky Prevatte wrote: > > That is

Re: Digi 003

I surely just almost bought one brand-new for about 600 more than you're talking about at Sweetwater. I saw one for sale on Craigs list for 600 a few weeks ago just missed it. I want something that will work with logic and ProTools. What all are you doing with the unit Matt? How deep can you go

Re: Digi 003

Just no audio playback. The surface came up and it control pan, transport and volume and other things. I did not do my research very well I thought it would also control logic Pro X as well but it would not and that played a great part in my returning the item. I still could not get any audio

Re: Digi 003

Hello, you can probably find a Mackie universal pro controller on reverb.com for under $400. I have used one of these for the past year or so and they work fairly well Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:55 PM, Ricky Prevatte wrote: > > Just no audio playback.

Re: Digi 003

I used a Maki extensively in the recording process, from arming tracks, to adjusting faders on the fly, to obviously being able to use punch mode, solos and mutes. As far as mixing goes I do use it a good bit but more so for creating a static mix, with volume faders and panning. Obviously, it

RE: Digi 003

I am sorry to hear that Ricky, sounds like you just better be safe than sorry. -Original Message- From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ricky Prevatte Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 8:38 AM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Digi 003

Re: Digi 003

That's funny, I was under the impression that the Mackie surfaces supported fader flip mode. Hmm… I thought it was part of the normal HUI protocol. Perhaps I'm wrong. Slau On Feb 1, 2016, at 6:50 PM, Matt Diemert wrote: > Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, and actually

Re: Digi 003

Digi going back to music go round. It is not going to work out for me, will not do logic, cannot get it situated with ProTools no audio playback or record for logic or ProTools. Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 > On Jan 30, 2016, at 10:16 AM, TheOreoMonster wrote: > > This

RE: Digi 003

: Re: Digi 003 This is why i ended up going with the Allen & Heath Zed R16 mixer over the Presounus. Its a mixer, interface and control surface all none. No motorized faders but soft take over so things don’t just jump when you start moving faders.. > On Jan 31, 2016, at 9:20 AM

Re: Digi 003

This is why i ended up going with the Allen & Heath Zed R16 mixer over the Presounus. Its a mixer, interface and control surface all none. No motorized faders but soft take over so things don’t just jump when you start moving faders.. > On Jan 31, 2016, at 9:20 AM, Ricky Prevatte

Re: Digi 003

I too thought it was part of the HUI protocol as well. > On Feb 1, 2016, at 10:05 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: > > That's funny, I was under the impression that the Mackie surfaces supported > fader flip mode. Hmm… I thought it was part of the normal HUI protocol. > Perhaps

Re: Digi 003

ssage- > From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of TheOreoMonster > Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 7:04 PM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: Digi 003 > > This is why i ended up going with the Allen & Heath Zed R16 mixer over th

RE: Digi 003

, the problem with the onyx is that it is not considered a full surface,. -Original Message- From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of TheOreoMonster Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 8:07 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Digi 003 It’s A so

RE: Digi 003

@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of TheOreoMonster Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 8:40 PM To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Digi 003 Yeah it was down to the ONYX and A for me. I went with the A cuz its did 18 by 18 instead of the mackie which only was 16 by 16. and actually the A can do 26 by 26 since

Re: Digi 003

t; Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 8:07 PM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: Digi 003 > > It’s A so the are known for their mic press and the 4 band eq on th board. > The converters seemed very nice in my experience. Unlike the Studio live > from presounus its an a

Re: Digi 003

Rickey, In all honesty I thjink the list needs to know the rest of the story. When I tried to work with you over the weekend, you were unable to re-route the output. It still displayed ch1/2 which according to you those are Presonus. Having said that, there are some Personus prefs hanging the

Re: Digi 003

rom: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptaccess@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of TheOreoMonster > Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 7:04 PM > To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: Digi 003 > > This is why i ended up going with the Allen & Heath Zed R16 mixer over the > Pr

Re: Digi 003

Just curious: did you install the 003 family driver? Was it an audio issue or the surface itself not coming up in the Hardware Setup dialog? Slau On Feb 1, 2016, at 12:38 PM, Ricky Prevatte wrote: > Digi going back to music go round. It is not going to work out for me,

Re: Digi 003

I will try and work it out it is going to be a big opportunity to adapt and change everything. Presonus Mike pres are wonderful but no automation, no control surface overall and no plug in work. I will have to adapt I can always use the mixer for live application and work out a way to expand

Re: Digi 003

Google can be your friend as well. > On Jan 30, 2016, at 9:20 AM, Ricky Prevatte wrote: > > I understand that fully well they've never responded to anything else I've > ever asked. So I thought I would ask here thank you! > > Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 > >> On Jan 30,

RE: Digi 003

I hope you can get it soarted out. I really enjoy mine. The pre's and the conversion aren’t to die for, but the SPDIF can solve any of those issues. They are typically a rock solid peace IMO and I haven't really came across anything over the last 4 or 5 years that is under 3 grand that I would

Re: Digi 003

I have never been able to get through on the phone that was my point. I certainly own them. Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 > On Jan 30, 2016, at 10:24 AM, TheOreoMonster wrote: > > If you own their products you should have access to phone support for both > companies,

Re: Digi 003

I understand that fully well they've never responded to anything else I've ever asked. So I thought I would ask here thank you! Ricky Prevatte LMBT1154 > On Jan 30, 2016, at 10:16 AM, TheOreoMonster wrote: > > This is a question you should direct to Avid and or

Re: Digi 003

This is a question you should direct to Avid and or PreSounus Tech support. > On Jan 30, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Ricky Prevatte wrote: > > Well got me a new preowned Digi003. I am having problems getting it > installed in protools 11.4 and logic pro x. I think there is a

Re: Digi 003

If you own their products you should have access to phone support for both companies, maybe time to get someone on the phone then. > On Jan 30, 2016, at 10:20 AM, Ricky Prevatte wrote: > > I understand that fully well they've never responded to anything else I've >

Re: Digi 003 scroll wheel questions

Hi John, Glad to hear you found a surface. In case you need it, I'm attaching a document that'll give you a layout of controls: -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

Re: Digi 003 questions

Hi Cliff, I think everybody can sympathize with wanting to get up and running as fast as possible. There are two things that come to mind based on what you've just written. If you're running on a fresh install, Spotlight will certainly spend a bunch of time indexing any drives connected to the

Re: Digi 003 questions

Ahhh... I was trying to record to an internal drive earlier on when the CPU usage was sky high! That might be the reason why it has gone from 120 to 70 % now, since I've formatted an old drive for exclusive pro tools use. But I don't think this drive even is the best either for PT use... Well,

Re: Digi 003 questions

Hi guys! I have run into some issues, and I really need some suggestions from someone who's not just as new as myself to the world of PT and controllers... :) The Problem is this: PT 11 works pretty fine together with the Digi 003 driver for 11, but PT 11 also eats up over 120 % of my Mac's

Re: Digi 003 questions

Cliff, Have you tried to reinstall Mavericks from scratch and only install Pro Tools? It doesn't make sense that the program would make your system gun its fans. Which machine are you on? Also, I'm sorry, but how does a process take up 120% or was that just an exaggeration? Best, slau On

Re: Digi 003 questions

Hi! Yeah, I sort of did that today... Two days ago I deleted the Machintosh HD and started fresh on MountainLion, and today I reinstalled Mavericks over a pretty fresh ML, so that's probably the next best I could do.. :) I'm on a MacBook Pro 13, mid 2012, 8 GB ram and 2,9 Ghz processor, if I

Re: Digi 003 questions

From what I understand, PT 11 takes up a smaller CPU foot print than any of the other versions of PT. - Original Message - From: Cliff Isaksen To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2014 10:29 AM Subject: Re: Digi 003 questions Hi! This is nothing less than

Re: Digi 003 questions

Hi! This is nothing less than awesome! I got PT only one month ago, and I'm going to the post office tomorrow to pick up a Digi 003, so the rtf will really come in handy, Slau! Thanks a lot! One question; Will I need drivers to get the Digi 003 up and running on Mavericks with PT 10, or is it

Re: Digi 003 questions

Hi Cliff, I've had a 003 knocking around the studio for a while, actually, since Pro Tools version 9 so there was never any need to install drivers, per se. I haven't used it with version 11 so I can't say whether there's any need for installing drivers of any kind. Others with 003s might be

Re: Digi 003 questions

Hi cliff, I have recently upgraded from pro tools nine to eleven. I use a Digi 002. It was indeed plug and play with version nine but I had to install the drivers to get it up and running with PT eleven. Its an easy download from the Avid website though and you'll be up and running quickly

Re: Digi 003 questions

Hi and thanks both of you! Since PT 11 for some weird reason is eating up 120 % of my CPU, I'm using PT 10 as long as possible, so I'll probably just have to try and see if I can use the Digi 003 first without installing any drivers. And if that won't work, I'll have to take a look at the avid

Re: Digi 003 questions

Hi, Yes you will need to install the digi 003 drivers for 10 and 11. I am not sure if you need both but I had a person from Avid remote into my mac and fix the ilok license for me and they installed the drivers. Nick Gawronski On 5/4/2014 1:44 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote: Hi Cliff, I've had a

Re: Digi 003 questions

Barton jedbar...@gmail.com To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:12 AM Subject: Re: Digi 003 questions Hey guys, Is this digi003 a good control surface to use? Does it ahve an audio scrub wheel? On 4/24/2014 12:02 PM, ramy moustafa wrote: Sorry i mean digi003

Re: Digi 003 questions

: Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:12 AM Subject: Re: Digi 003 questions Hey guys, Is this digi003 a good control surface to use? Does it ahve an audio scrub wheel? On 4/24/2014 12:02 PM, ramy moustafa wrote: Sorry i mean digi003 Where can i bought it? Ramy moustafa saber Musicc

Re: Digi 003 questions

Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:12 AM Subject: Re: Digi 003 questions Hey guys, Is this digi003 a good control surface to use? Does it ahve an audio scrub wheel? On 4/24/2014 12:02 PM, ramy moustafa wrote: Sorry i mean digi003 Where can i bought it? Ramy moustafa saber Musicc

Re: Digi 003 questions

Hi all: I have my bcf2000K and I saw your digi 2000 lay out, and I think it will make pro tools more and more easier for us. am I right? but I tried to buy it but I can't, what about it's price? and where can I buy it as a new piece? thanks On 4/20/14, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Digi 003 questions

Hi Ramy, I think you meant the 002 rather than the 200. To whom were you directing your question? Did someone post a layout document for the 002? Slau On Apr 24, 2014, at 10:36 AM, Ramy Moustafa moshtaqlealga...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all: I have my bcf2000K and I saw your digi 2000 lay out,

Re: Digi 003 questions

Sorry i mean digi003 Where can i bought it? Ramy moustafa saber Musicc instructor at: faculty of musical education music arranger and sound engineer Sent from my iPhone On Apr 24, 2014, at 5:55 PM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ramy, I think you meant the 002 rather than

Re: Digi 003 questions

Hey guys, Is this digi003 a good control surface to use? Does it ahve an audio scrub wheel? On 4/24/2014 12:02 PM, ramy moustafa wrote: Sorry i mean digi003 Where can i bought it? Ramy moustafa saber Musicc instructor at: faculty of musical education music arranger and sound engineer Sent

Re: Digi 003 questions

Yes, it has a scrub wheel. - Original Message - From: Jed Barton jedbar...@gmail.com To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:12 AM Subject: Re: Digi 003 questions Hey guys, Is this digi003 a good control surface to use? Does it ahve an audio scrub wheel

Re: Digi 003 questions

@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:12 AM Subject: Re: Digi 003 questions Hey guys, Is this digi003 a good control surface to use? Does it ahve an audio scrub wheel? On 4/24/2014 12:02 PM, ramy moustafa wrote: Sorry i mean digi003 Where can i bought it? Ramy moustafa saber Musicc

Re: Digi 003 questions

: Digi 003 questions Hey guys, Is this digi003 a good control surface to use? Does it ahve an audio scrub wheel? On 4/24/2014 12:02 PM, ramy moustafa wrote: Sorry i mean digi003 Where can i bought it? Ramy moustafa saber Musicc instructor at: faculty of musical education music

Re: Digi 003 questions

The Digi 002 is less than half the price and does not have the scrub wheel and has only one headphone jack. - Original Message - From: ramy moustafa moshtaqlealga...@gmail.com To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 10:27 AM Subject: Re: Digi 003 questions R

Re: Digi 003 questions

Hey, Just for your information and i hope this is not considered hijacking of this thread since i actually talk about the Digi003. I'm trying to make the 003 work with an app called Surface Reader which can read displays of the surface and tell about what buttons and such are but i think i may

Re: Digi 003 questions

Hi John, Yes, certainly, the faders control volume by default. Here's the layout document: On Apr 19, 2014, at 10:11 PM, John Gunn g...@tznet.com wrote: Slau, I guess I meant by faders, can you contrrol volume by faders and if you don't mind, send me the file. John On Apr 19,

Re: Digi 003 questions

Hi John, Yes, the 003 uses FW400 ports, works with Mavericks and Pro Tools 11. I'm a little confused by your asking whether the faders work in PT 11. If you do get the 003, I'll send you a layout document that'll help you get acquainted with the buttons and controls. Best, Slau On Apr 19,

Re: Digi 003 questions

Slau, I guess I meant by faders, can you contrrol volume by faders and if you don't mind, send me the file. John On Apr 19, 2014, at 4:34 PM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote: Hi John, Yes, the 003 uses FW400 ports, works with Mavericks and Pro Tools 11. I'm a little confused

Re: digi 003 unable to setup inputs and outputs as pro tools 10.0.1 crashes

Select the application to share. share free wallpapers website protecteyesimages.com 在 2012年3月28日星期三UTC+8上午6时20分38秒，Nick Gawronski写道： Hi, I have pro tools 10.0.1 on my mac book pro running lion 10.7.3 and have installed the drivers for the digi 003 that came with pro tools 10. I set the

Re: digi 003 unable to setup inputs and outputs as pro tools 10.0.1 crashes

This saved my life thanks Slau On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 6:33:18 PM UTC-4, Slau Halatyn wrote: Nick, First thing you need to do when you launch Pro Tools is to go to the Playback Engine dialog under Setups and select the 003 as your playback engine. Then go to the I/O Setup, choose the

Re: digi 003 unable to setup inputs and outputs as pro tools 10.0.1 crashes

Hi, Where can I get this getting started guide as the only thing that came with it was the pro tools LE discs which I don't want to install as I already have pro tools 10? Does avid still support the digi 003 and could they remote into my mac book pro if they needed to change any settings? I

Re: digi 003 unable to setup inputs and outputs as pro tools 10.0.1 crashes

Hi, I only have the pro tools 10 documentation located under the help menu nothing just on the digi 003. I did not install the pro tools LE that came with the digi 003 as I had the newer version and drivers already installed as when I orderd the digi 003 I just installed the drivers that came

Re: digi 003 unable to setup inputs and outputs as pro tools 10.0.1 crashes

if you look in the degidesign or avid folder in your applications folder, you should finda documentations folder. In there you should find every manual for every pro tools related product. On Mar 27, 2012, at 11:37 PM, Nick Gawronski n...@nickgawronski.com wrote: On Mar 27, 2012, at 10:06