https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24349
Anne ann...@annevk.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com wrote:
Until we can agree on this, Type 2 feels like an attractive nuisance and, on
reflection, one that I think we should punt to compilers like caja in the
interim. If toolkits need it, I'd like to understand those
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13913
Bug 13913 depends on bug 13912, which changed state.
Bug 13912 Summary: What order are attributes in?
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13912
What|Removed |Added
[ Bcc public-webapps-testuite ]
Thanks to Dom and Tobie, [w-p-t] PRs are automatically tagged with WG
identifiers (pattern is wg-WGname f.ex. wg-webapps). This means
there is an easy way to get a list of the open PRs for WebApp's tests:
On 2/13/14 5:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Also, Type 2 can be used for built-in elements
Built-in elements need Type 4.
-Boris
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com wrote:
Until we can agree on this, Type 2 feels like an attractive nuisance and, on
reflection, one that I think we should punt to compilers like caja
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com
wrote:
Until we can agree on this, Type 2 feels like an attractive nuisance
and, on
reflection, one that I think we should punt to compilers like
* Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com wrote:
Until we can agree on this, Type 2 feels like an attractive nuisance and, on
reflection, one that I think we should punt to compilers like caja in the
interim. If toolkits need it, I'd like
Hello public-webapps!
As promised, here's the plans and expectations summary for the Web
Components spec umbrella. Apologies for taking so long.
== Web Components Explainer ==
Current Editor: domin...@google.com
Status: Non-normative document
The explainer is continually updated to reflect the
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24349
Morrita Hajime morr...@google.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
* Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Type 2 is not meant to be a security mechanism. It is meant to be an
encapsulation mechanism. Let me give a comparison. Many JavaScript
programmers choose to use closures as a way to store private data for
objects. That is an encapsulation mechanism. It is not, in
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 12, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com wrote:
In discussion with Elliot and Erik, there appears to be an additional
complication: any of the DOM manipulation methods that aren't locked down
Tab,
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:09:33 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com
Until we can agree on this, Type 2 feels like an attractive nuisance
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile
cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:09:33 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Alex Russell
On Feb 13, 2014, at 4:01 PM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 12, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com wrote:
In discussion with Elliot and Erik, there appears to be an
Dimitri, I'd still love to hear feedback from you on the idea above.
Seems like it could fix one of the design issues that a lot of people
have reacted to.
/ Jonas
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:27 PM, Boris Zbarsky
We (Apple) support this proposal assuming that we can implement the proposed
algorithm efficiently.
We would try to prototype it in WebKit in the coming months and will report
implementation issues, including the feasibility of efficient implementation,
if exists.
- R. Niwa
On Feb 13, 2014,
On Feb 13, 2014, at 4:01 PM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 12, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Alex Russell slightly...@google.com wrote:
It is meant to be an encapsulation mechanism. Let me give a comparison. Many
18 matches
Mail list logo
