On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr wrote:
My understanding of the document is that a website can register itself
as a share endpoint but can't try to programmatically starts a share
action; instead, the user will use the browser UI to do so. Is that
correct? I
[ Sorry for the cross posting but the Fullscreen spec is a joint
deliverable for WebApps and CSS ]
Hi Anne, Tantek, WebApps and CSSWG,
During WebApps' October 27 f2f meeting, the attendees had a straw-poll
regarding stopping work on the Fullscreen spec (a joint deliverable for
these two WGS)
07.11.2014, 14:41, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com:
[ Sorry for the cross posting but the Fullscreen spec is a joint
deliverable for WebApps and CSS ]
Hi Anne, Tantek, WebApps and CSSWG,
During WebApps' October 27 f2f meeting, the attendees had a straw-poll
regarding stopping work on
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
[Draft-Note] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/fullscreen/raw-file/default/TR.html
It would be nice if editor's draft points to https://fullscreen.spec.whatwg.org/
I no longer work for Opera Software.
The Status of this Document
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you want`Mozilla Foundation` like Tantek? (If not, please let me know
what you do want.)
I would prefer just Mozilla. It's not a legal matter, after all.
Yes, I agree that for a gutted spec including mail list
On 11/7/14 8:43 AM, cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:
07.11.2014, 14:41, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com:
[ Sorry for the cross posting but the Fullscreen spec is a joint
a) Stop work on the spec (and remove it as a deliverable if/when
WebApps' charter is updated)
Yes (and no)
For the
On 11/7/14 9:05 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you want`Mozilla Foundation` like Tantek? (If not, please let me know
what you do want.)
I would prefer just Mozilla. It's not a legal matter, after all.
Please give me
On 11/7/14 8:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
[Draft-Note] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/fullscreen/raw-file/default/TR.html
It would be nice if editor's draft points to https://fullscreen.spec.whatwg.org/
That would be OK
During WebApps' October 27 meeting, the participants agreed to stop work
on the UI Events spec and to publish it as a WG Note (see [Mins]). As
such, this is a formal Call for Consensus (CfC) to:
a) Stop work on this spec
b) Publish a gutted WG Note of the spec; see [Draft-Note]
c) Gut the ED
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
If anyone has comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply by November
14 at the latest.
My concern is that we previously agreed that UI Events would be a much
more suitable name for the contents of DOM Level 3
During WebApps' XHR discussion on October 27, no one expressed interest
to work on XHR L2 [Mins]. The last TR of XHR L2 was published in January
2012 [WD] thus that version should be updated to clarify work has
stopped. As such, this is a Call for Consensus to:
a) Publish a gutted WG Note of
On 11/07/2014 09:01 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 11/7/14 8:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
[Draft-Note] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/fullscreen/raw-file/default/TR.html
It would be nice if editor's draft points to
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/TR/XHRL2-Note-2014-Nov.html
Should this not include a reference to https://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/?
--
https://annevankesteren.nl/
(I realise that my reply went to public-webapps instead of whatwg, not
sure why. I will blame my email client :))
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014, at 20:36, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Wouldn't be worth experimenting first with a list of predefined share
endpoints (that you anyway might want to have) and see
On Nov 7, 2014, at 17:55, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/TR/XHRL2-Note-2014-Nov.html
Should this not include a reference to https://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/?
07.11.2014, 17:53, fantasai fantasai.li...@inkedblade.net:
On 11/07/2014 09:01 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 11/7/14 8:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com
wrote:
[Draft-Note]
07.11.2014, 15:05, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com:
On 11/7/14 8:43 AM, cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:
07.11.2014, 14:41, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com:
[ Sorry for the cross posting but the Fullscreen spec is a joint
a) Stop work on the spec (and remove it as a deliverable
FWIW, I think we should be concentrating on something like the Tubes (aka
navigator.connect): https://github.com/dglazkov/tubes
It is hard to impossible to get these types APIs right on the first try.
That's why we need to create a clearinghouse for capability experiments and
be data-driven in
07.11.2014, 18:28, Domenic Denicola d...@domenic.me:
On Nov 7, 2014, at 17:55, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com
wrote:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/TR/XHRL2-Note-2014-Nov.html
Should this not
On 11/7/14 12:57 PM, cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:
07.11.2014, 17:53, fantasai fantasai.li...@inkedblade.net:
On 11/07/2014 09:01 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
On 11/7/14 8:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/7/14 1:05 PM, cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:
07.11.2014, 18:28, Domenic Denicola d...@domenic.me:
On Nov 7, 2014, at 17:55, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 5, 2014, at 7:54 AM, cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:
we have had a (northern) spring meeting in California for the last few years,
co-located with HTML.
The HTML group is considering having a meeting in may(ish) 2015 in Paris -
and there is an offer to host such a meeting.
So the
To clarify: are you asking to rename DOM Level 3 Events to UI Events?
Perhaps a fresh name would help get that spec done faster :)
Gary what do you think?
-Original Message-
From: annevankeste...@gmail.com [mailto:annevankeste...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Anne van Kesteren
Sent: Friday,
23 matches
Mail list logo