On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 23:50:48 +0200, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
So, rather than continuing to complain about this process on
public-webapps, I would appreciate it if you would please move TR
process type discussions to another Public list.
I'm not asking to
On 6 Jul 2011, at 2:41 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> Hi Hixie,
>
> On 7/6/11 1:55 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
>> On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>> Any comments re the priority of this bug, in particular if it must be
>>> addressed before publishing a new LCWD?
>> Can we please stop lett
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
> So, rather than continuing to complain about this process on
> public-webapps, I would appreciate it if you would please move TR
> process type discussions to another Public list.
I'm not asking to have a discussion about it at all; I'm asking that
Hi Hixie,
On 7/6/11 1:55 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Any comments re the priority of this bug, in particular if it must be
addressed before publishing a new LCWD?
Can we please stop letting the LCWD/CR/PR process nonsense drive the
prioritisation of the