Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS [Was: IE Team's Proposal for Cross Site Requests]

the comments on the group and then saying that you have no plans to discuss them at length during the next two weeks is not going to work. --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/ http://sideshowbarker.net/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: FW: [Adding mouseenter and mouseleave events]

and that the existing solutions are exceedingly complicated. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2008May/0111.html OK, so I guess we ought to decide where we go with this next. Take it up as an issue for the group? Assign somebody an action? Something else? --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith

Re: New Progress Events editor's draft

Birbeck, webBackplane [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number 05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street, London, EC2A 4RR) -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/ http

Re: Agenda and logistics...

of XHR2. Hopefully Mike will manage the right W3C mojo soon and announce the page with the information. Cheers Chaals -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/ http://sideshowbarker.net/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

heads-up: /2006/webapi/Binding4DOM moved to /2006/webapi/WebIDL

-dP webapi If you do run into any cvs client problems that you can't figure out, please let me know right away. --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/ http://sideshowbarker.net/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

old WAF WG wiki to be deleted; save your content

/RecentChanges ...so we won't be migrating it in whole over to the current MediaWiki-based Wiki (as we are doing with some of the other older MoinMoin-based ones). --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/

Re: [XHR] Some comments on charset in the Content-Type header

instead. I hope that clears things up. --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/

Re: [XHR] Some comments on charset in the Content-Type header

=- * ** (1337 ASCII art optional :P ) +1!! -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/

Re: [XHR] Some comments on charset in the Content-Type header

Marcos Caceres [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008-09-19 15:46 +0100: On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Michael(tm) Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Boris Zbarsky [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008-09-19 09:35 -0400: Anne van Kesteren wrote: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest/#send Oh, right. I

Re: [widgets] Updates FPWD published

Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008-10-10 10:38 +0300: On Oct 10, 2008, at 01:44, Marcos Caceres wrote: http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-updates/ [...] The Editor's Draft link points to the Editor's Draft of another spec. Fixed --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/

Re: [widgets] Digsig namespace document

will eventually end up at: http://www.w3.org/ns/widgets-digsig Actually, it's there now. We can update it later as needed. --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/

July 2008 f2f meeting minutes now publicly accessible

-minutes.html http://www.w3.org/2008/07/02-wam-minutes.html http://www.w3.org/2008/07/03-wam-minutes.html -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/

W3C and APIs writeup from TAG members

think) Jonathan Rees, and the current version of it is here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Jun/att-0085/W3C_and_APIs.htm -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/

dev.w3.org CVS access [was: Why I don't attend the weekly teleconference]

is SSH2-based, so what we would need from you is an SSH2 public key (either RSA or DSA, doesn't matter). --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/

Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS Next Step(s)

(such as PHP, ASP, or CGI) on IIS and Apache. - Must not require that the server filters the entity body of the resource in order to deny cross-origin access to all resources on the server. -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/

Re: Points of order on this WG

with? But if it is the case that the issue really is with one specific proposal, I really wish we could discuss that one specific proposal instead of making a process issue out of this. --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/

Re: [WebStorage] Property enumeration and checking presence

.org/TR/html5/browsers.html#storage-mutex http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/browsers.html#obtain-the-storage-mutex -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/

Re: [WebStorage] Property enumeration and checking presence

Nikunj R. Mehta nikunj.me...@oracle.com, 2009-06-30 14:54 -0700: On Jun 30, 2009, at 10:28 AM, Michael(tm) Smith wrote: Nikunj R. Mehta nikunj.me...@oracle.com, 2009-06-30 09:12 -0700: I was inquiring about the term property enumeration I think in this case it means iterating over

seeking an editor for Web DOM Core draft

ownership/editorship of that draft, please let me or Doug Schepers know. --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/

Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB

to something intended to be implemented for some other purpose than for delivering and interacting with content on the Web. --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/

Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB

Storage might be more precise, but I'm not sure whether most people would consider that an improvement. --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/

Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB

-- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/

Re: [IndexedDB] Bug/enhancement requests

=WebAppsWGcomponent=WebSimpleDB -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Re: IndexedDB - renaming

/Overview.html I've just now set up that redirect. Let me know if you find any problems with it --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Re: [Web Workers] Bug filed and general question

directly and let me know. You can reach me on #whatwg on irc.freenode.net pretty much any time I'm actually awake, or also feel free to e-mail me directly. -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Re: File API and Directory API feedback

bugzilla account (and give me a heads-up after), I'll set you as the default assignee for those components. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Re: File API and Directory API feedback

, but otherwise I think we should remove those components. The reason is that only members of the group can raise issues in the tracker. So bugzilla is useful if you want to enable public commenters to raise issues. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Re: [webstorage] Moving Web Storage back to Last Call WD

? (Personally I'm fine with it going to REC yesterday, so...) Bugzilla shows no open bugs for this spec I just now raised a new one: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111 -- Michael[tm] Smith http

Re: Testing Requirements

on that goals page. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications

are some that aren't included in your page yet but probably should be. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Re: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization

needed. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/+

Re: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization

to help make sure you're making a fully informed decision based on what the actual benefits and costs of the different options are. --Mike [1] http://www.w3.org/community/about/#cg [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/htmlspeech/XGR-htmlspeech/ -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/+

Re: Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech Javascript API - seeking feedback for eventual standardization

Michael[tm] Smith m...@w3.org, 2012-01-11 20:36 +0900: Satish S sat...@google.com, 2012-01-11 10:04 +: The Community Groups [1] page says they are for anyone to socialize their ideas for the Web at the W3C for possible future standardization. I don't think that page adequately

Re: RfC: LCWD of Web Socket API; comment deadline October 21

the cracks until now due to it not getting on my radar. But it's fixed in CVS now, and the spec should get regenerated within the next couple of days. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/+

Enabling a Web app to override auto rotation?

is if it is currently possible for a Web application to do the same thing; that is, to prevent the browser on the device from auto-rotating into a different mode. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/+

Re: Enabling a Web app to override auto rotation?

public-webapps list mail :) (Been away working on some other things for over the last week.) --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/+

Re: CfC by 02-14: Add IME API to the charter

there shall be active liaise-ing with i18n folk on this API. If you believe we need to capture that in the charter then I can work with the chairs to make sure we do that. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/+

[testsuites] WebSocket support on w3c-test.org

/ If anybody's interested in actually trying that right now, and you have *_wsh.py handlers you'd like to have installed, we can work on getting something set up to facilitate it. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/+

WebSocket-enabled Jetty 7.6 now on w3c-test.org

). If there are any follow-up questions about either the Java or Python support, we should take that to public-webapps-testsu...@w3.org or public-test-in...@w3.org --Mike Michael[tm] Smith m...@w3.org, 2012-02-22 16:14 +0900: We now have initial WebSocket server support set up on w3c-test.org. Simple

Re: Web Components Suggestion

-- basically, filters them out -- before the Jing part of the toolchain even sees them. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Re: Web Components Suggestion

the custom tag names to some recognized prefix -- e.g., x-fancyButton or whatever. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Re: [admin] using Bugzilla's component tracking feature? [Was: [webcomponents]-ish: Visibility of work in Bugzilla

and all that. So if this component-watching feature is something that's recent -- added after 3.6.2 -- then that would be why we don't have it. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Re: Reviewing test submissions

than every 10 minutes? There is and I will try to get it set up next week, unless Robin beats me to it first. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Re: Fwd: [XHR] request error distinction: abort and error

to show the dialog with information about network error, but this dialog should not appear in other cases, as that will annoy the user. in my another product, i want to do retry in case of network error, but i should not do it in case of cancellation by the user. Thanks -- Michael[tm] Smith

Re: [admin] Recommended way to mark bugs as `next level`? [Was: Re: [custom-elements] Seeking pre-LC comments for Custom Elements; deadline Oct 13

WebApps components. We'd need to first decide on what the set of values should be. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Re: [admin] Recommended way to mark bugs as `next level`? [Was: Re: [custom-elements] Seeking pre-LC comments for Custom Elements; deadline Oct 13

Hi Dimitri, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org, 2013-10-05 09:01 -0700: If I set resolved=later, the target milestone doesn't seem as useful. It does it you plan to reopen a bug at some later date and work on it then --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Re: Sync API for workers

intended. --Mike P.S. Of course there's room for disagreement about whether synchronous APIs are even a good idea even for the Workers case - http://infrequently.org/2013/05/the-case-against-synchronous-worker-apis-2/ -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Re: [testing] Common way to manage test bugs?

Scott González scott.gonza...@gmail.com, 2013-12-19 10:23 -0500: Can Bugzilla listen to GitHub events and auto-comment? There's a github hook that can be used - https://raw.github.com/github/github-services/master/docs/bugzilla -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike

Re: [xhr] Questions on the future of the XHR spec, W3C snapshot

the XHR spec should be clear (think Warning!), that because of the Fetch reference, the XHR spec might never get published beyond CR. That's not necessary. Nor would it be helpful. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Questions on the future of the XHR spec, W3C snapshot

not avoid considering some particular option just because they've been told it seems like it's not possible. Or just because of the wrong assumption that since it's never been done before, it somehow must not be possible. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike signature.asc

Re: [IndexedDB] link to Editor's draft is a 404

of the spec. That makes sense to me. Yup, sorry about thatーI forgot a step when we migrated the repos. But I've now set up the redirects and things should be working as expected. If not lemme know. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Spring meeting in Paris?

between Jun 9-12: http://www.w3.org/2014/12/18-html-wg-minutes.html At this point it's almost certainly not going to be in June at MIT. It's going to be mid-April or end-April or mid-May, more likely in Europe. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike signature.asc Description

Re: Moving W3C Streams to Note and adding disclaimer [was: [charter] What is the plan for Streams API?]

at this point. —Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: what's the meaning of lighter blue thick underlined terms in some specs?

was officially a separate spec upstream as well, it was folded back into the HTML spec years ago. And the content of the Web Messaging spec has been, since it was first defined, part of the HTML spec. —Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Moving W3C Streams to Note and adding disclaimer [was: [charter] What is the plan for Streams API?]

the draft charter. -- Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RE-SENDING [Apple's updated feedback on Custom Elements and Shadow DOM]

with content written for Chrome’s shipping implementation. We are not sure if this will be required, but named slots may force it if adopted. - End forwarded message - -- Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [pointerlock] Oct 2015 Pointer Lock Status

e weeks of time (say, three months) needed to do the actual hands-on work of designing it and implementing it and landing it. Hopefully we may finally now be reaching the point where we have critical mass of people who need to see it happen sooner rather than later. —Mike -- Michael[tm]

Re: Components F2F

/WebComponentsJuly2015Meeting -- Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: John Schulz introduction

ting and working with you all. Welcome! Are there some particular deliverables in the group that you’re especially interested in? Just curious to hear your thoughts on which align well with the problems you’re trying to solve in your own development and the specific user needs/priorities you’re wor

Re: Telecon / meeting on first week of April for Web Components

out a lot better. But another option is to use a WebRTC service like https://appear.in/ which work well enough these days with up to 8 video connections going at once. —Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike signature.asc Description: PGP signature