Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl>, 2016-04-05 07:10 +0200: > Archived-At: > <http://www.w3.org/mid/cadnb78jvj1kartvxakcda-xq18xzv56bdocovs8prbmims6...@mail.gmail.com> > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Jan Miksovsky <jan@component.kitchen> wrote: > > I have no idea how to settle this question. If everyone else is happy using > > WebEx, and someone else can set up the video call, I certainly don’t have a > > problem with that. (My only issue would be if the meeting was restricted to > > voice only.) > > Does WebEx even support video?
It does > In any event, per > https://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/InstallingWebEx this would require > Java, which is a major security risk, and it seems the fallback is > audio-only. FWIW, there is an Android client (including video support). That is what I use personally, though the only thing I use it for is it get the webex system to call me back to dial me in to the conference on audio. After I get that audio connection I then just shut down the client. > So it seems better to use Hangouts or some such. Yeah, if everybody can agree to that it may work out a lot better. But another option is to use a WebRTC service like https://appear.in/ which work well enough these days with up to 8 video connections going at once. —Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
