Hi,
I have hit one more dead end :(. After I click on the Build button, I get
the message Host xxx enabled for installation boot away. And I can see a
link created in /tftpboot/linux-install/pxelinux.cfg with the MAC address
of the machine being rebuilt.
However, the symlink points to a
Hi all,
I'm trying to work with augeas to add pinnings to my /etc/apt/
preferences file. But I'm not getting my head around it. If I do the
simplest I can think of:
augeas { Apt/preferences pinnings for augeas-lenses.:
context = /files/etc/apt/preferences,
Hi,
did you read
http://theforeman.org/wiki/foreman/Unattended_installations#How-does-Foreman-manages-TFTP
cheers,
Ohad
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:02 AM, LOhit lohi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have hit one more dead end :(. After I click on the Build button, I get
the message Host xxx
Hi .*,
I'm looking for a more or less thorough documentation of the usage of
the parsedfile provider. I'm already scanning through all the existing
providers but some open questions remain.
In particular I want to write a provider editing the /etc/sysconf/
files, in particular I need to alter
Hi,
Yes, I did. And this is what I understand,
1) Clicking the Build button creates a pxe config file in the directory
specified in settings.yaml
2) After the machine is rebuilt, this file/link is removed.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Best regards,
-LOhit
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:54 PM,
Hi,
Thats correct, but you still need to generate the config file (e.g. as in
the examples) per OS.
I guess that in the near future (some code already exist on some github
branch) that will auto copy the kernel / ramdisks and create the pxefiles
directly.
cheers,
Ohad
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at
Ahhh!!! I thought those files would be generated automatically. One more
item added to my foreman wishlist. :)
Please let me know if I can contribute in any way.
-LOhit
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Ohad Levy ohadl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thats correct, but you still need to
:)
Lets start with feature requests for anything in your wishlist
Ohad
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:09 PM, LOhit lohi...@gmail.com wrote:
Ahhh!!! I thought those files would be generated automatically. One
more item added to my foreman wishlist. :)
Please let me know if I can contribute
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:21 PM, S H shdashb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Scott Smith sc...@ohlol.net wrote:
S H wrote:
After an unexpected and unreasonably long hiatus, I've finally returned
to implementing Puppet in my environment.
My puppetmaster: Puppet
On 2/22/10 7:41 AM, S H wrote:
Anything else make sense to check? After about a week I've got 19
processes running.
Are you using Passenger? If not, try it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to
... I know this can be done with a simple exec of sed but ...
Or with the host native type. See
http://docs.reductivelabs.com/references/stable/type.html#host
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email
I ran into a similar situation maybe this will help.
I just starated rolling out new puppet and ruby packages on Solaris
10.
Facter 1.5.7 (staying the same)
ruby 1.8.6.? - 1.8.7 p249
puppet 0.25.1 - 0.25.4
My initial tests of upgrading an existing puppetmaster and a few
nodes went fine.
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 16:23 +, Paul Elliott wrote:
I'm just starting to look at using Augeas with Puppet to manage some of
our configuration files. I thought I would start with a simple task of
removing an entry from the /etc/hosts file. I'm not finding it simple
though!
We have a
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 01:16 -0800, Tim Stoop wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to work with augeas to add pinnings to my /etc/apt/
preferences file. But I'm not getting my head around it. If I do the
simplest I can think of:
augeas { Apt/preferences pinnings for augeas-lenses.:
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 15:06 -0500, Joe McDonagh wrote:
I have not thought about using augeas because last time I tried to build
it for our standard OS (Ubuntu 8.04) IIRC it needed a newer version of
glibc.
I haven't seen that problem - but if you run into it again, I'd very
much appreciate
On Feb 22, 9:08 am, deet somew...@gmail.com wrote:
My work around was to populate the hosts file with a puppet entry and
remove the --server X.X.X.X flags from my boot strap script.
Additionally I had to ensure the client node has an entry in the
masters hosts file.
I still assume this is
David Lutterkort wrote:
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 15:06 -0500, Joe McDonagh wrote:
I have not thought about using augeas because last time I tried to build
it for our standard OS (Ubuntu 8.04) IIRC it needed a newer version of
glibc.
I haven't seen that problem - but if you run into it
Did you add the FQDN of the server, the server's name, or both to the
hosts file on the client?
Our hosts only have a node name as we don't have nis/ldap/dns for
network name resolution.
In this case the puppet master's hostname is dev-puppet and I did
not include that in the clients
On Feb 22, 12:37 pm, deet somew...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you add the FQDN of the server, the server's name, or both to the
hosts file on the client?
Our hosts only have a node name as we don't have nis/ldap/dns for
network name resolution.
In this case the puppet master's hostname is
I've recently set up foreman with my existing puppet server, and I was
able to get all the host reporting working (I'm using storeconfigs),
and once I ran:
RAILS_ENV=production rake puppet:import:puppet_classes
My puppet classes showed up on the settings page, however, it doesn't
seem to be
I received my copy of ;login (the Usenix magazine) today. There's an
article* comparing CPU utilisation of Puppet and Cfengine. To
abbreviate massively: Puppet requires much more CPU than Cfengine when
both verifying and fixing configuration.
I'm in the early days of implementing Puppet and this
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:17:52 +, Toby Riddell toby.ridd...@gmail.com
wrote:
I received my copy of ;login (the Usenix magazine) today. There's an
article* comparing CPU utilisation of Puppet and Cfengine. To
abbreviate massively: Puppet requires much more CPU than Cfengine when
both
I'm not really surprised by this, puppet is written in Ruby (an interpreted
language) vs CFengine which is written in C. I've used both, and I'd
gladly trade a little CPU performance for the stability gains offered by
puppet. CFengine is notoriously buggy in implementation, something I can
On 22 February 2010 16:37, James Cammarata j...@sngx.net wrote:
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:17:52 +, Toby Riddell toby.ridd...@gmail.com
wrote:
I received my copy of ;login (the Usenix magazine) today. There's an
article* comparing CPU utilisation of Puppet and Cfengine. To
abbreviate
On Feb 22, 1:17 pm, Toby Riddell toby.ridd...@gmail.com wrote:
I received my copy of ;login (the Usenix magazine) today. There's an
article* comparing CPU utilisation of Puppet and Cfengine. To
abbreviate massively: Puppet requires much more CPU than Cfengine when
both verifying and fixing
I have a define that sets a bunch of default values:
define virtualhost($vhostname, $vhost_template, ... , $ssl_enabled
= false) {
if $ssl_enabled == true {
$extension = '-ssl'
} else {
$extension = ''
}
file {
Hi.
can you send a --debug --trace of your puppetd run? thanks.
I send a log with --debug --trace.
Do you have any idea?
#
# Starting puppetmasterd.
#
mise# puppetpuppetmasterd --debug --trace --no-daemonize
debug: Failed to load library 'selinux' for feature 'selinux'
debug: Failed to load
27 matches
Mail list logo
