[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-126) PythonHandler in directive sets req.hlist.directory to useless value.

2006-02-14 Thread Graham Dumpleton (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-126?page=comments#action_12366319 ] Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-126: FWIW, I think I know how to fix the above so it works. This time I stumbled onto the fact that in Apache one can p

mutex dir?

2006-02-14 Thread Oden Eriksson
Hello. In our package in Mandriva I patch mod_python.c so that the mutex stuff is put in "/var/cache/httpd/mod_python/". But now with mod_python-3.2.7 plus fixes from the trunk and running the test suite it complains it cannot access "/var/cache/httpd/mod_python/" (of course). So my question/re

[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-111) Sessions don't set accessed time on read

2006-02-14 Thread Sebastjan Trepca (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-111?page=comments#action_12366331 ] Sebastjan Trepca commented on MODPYTHON-111: OK, I understand and agree with your but then someone should change the documentation because now it says: " A ses

[jira] Updated: (MODPYTHON-111) Sessions don't set accessed time on read

2006-02-14 Thread Sebastjan Trepca (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-111?page=all ] Sebastjan Trepca updated MODPYTHON-111: --- Component: documentation > Sessions don't set accessed time on read > > > Key: MODPYTHON-111

Re: mutex dir?

2006-02-14 Thread Oden Eriksson
tisdagen den 14 februari 2006 18.35 skrev Jim Gallacher: > Oden Eriksson wrote: > > tisdagen den 14 februari 2006 14.19 skrev Jim Gallacher: > >>Oden Eriksson wrote: > >>>Hello. > >>> > >>>In our package in Mandriva I patch mod_python.c so that the mutex stuff > >>>is put in "/var/cache/httpd/mod_p

Re: mutex dir?

2006-02-14 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote: I wonder if we should generalize this, so rather than PythonMutexDir, we have PythonModuleConfig. Usage might look like: PythonModuleConfig mutex_dir /path/to/mutexs PythonModuleConfig max_mutex_locks 8 I may be wrong, but I think the reason this wa

Re: Getting Started on mod_python 3.3.

2006-02-14 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
Based on today's traffic on the mailing lists, I think that we should go for a short-term 3.2.8 release of mod_python, with certified Apache 2.2 support on multiple platforms. The code is only there but I suppose we'll need a lot of testing, so maybe we could expect to release this in a month or tw

Re: Getting Started on mod_python 3.3.

2006-02-14 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
2006/2/14, Nicolas Lehuen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Based on today's traffic on the mailing lists, I think that we should > go for a short-term 3.2.8 release of mod_python, with certified Apache > 2.2 support on multiple platforms. The code is only there but I > suppose we'll need a lot of testing, so

Re: Getting Started on mod_python 3.3.

2006-02-14 Thread Jim Gallacher
Nicolas Lehuen wrote: Based on today's traffic on the mailing lists, I think that we should go for a short-term 3.2.8 release of mod_python, with certified Apache 2.2 support on multiple platforms. The code is only there but I suppose we'll need a lot of testing, so maybe we could expect to relea

Re: Getting Started on mod_python 3.3.

2006-02-14 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Nicolas Lehuen wrote: 2006/2/14, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] If we want to go down the path of having interim 3.2 bug rollup releases while 3.3 is being developed, might I suggest that we target the following for such a release in the near future. MODPYTHO

Re: Getting Started on mod_python 3.3.

2006-02-14 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Grisha wrote .. > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Nicolas Lehuen wrote: > > > 2006/2/14, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > [...] > >> If we want to go down the path of having interim 3.2 bug rollup releases > >> while 3.3 is being developed, might I suggest that we target the following > >> for su

Re: mutex dir?

2006-02-14 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Grisha wrote .. > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote: > > > I wonder if we should generalize this, so rather than PythonMutexDir, > we have > > PythonModuleConfig. Usage might look like: > > > > PythonModuleConfig mutex_dir /path/to/mutexs > > PythonModuleConfig max_mutex_locks 8 > > I

Re: Getting Started on mod_python 3.3.

2006-02-14 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Is my list of suggested JIRA items then seen as being reasonable for such a projected release? Do we want to create a new JIRA issue for the mutex directory issue and also include a fix for that, but limit it to just an option to configure to override the directory? Graham Nicolas Lehuen wrote .

Re: mutex dir?

2006-02-14 Thread Jim Gallacher
Graham Dumpleton wrote: Grisha wrote .. On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote: I wonder if we should generalize this, so rather than PythonMutexDir, we have PythonModuleConfig. Usage might look like: PythonModuleConfig mutex_dir /path/to/mutexs PythonModuleConfig max_mutex_locks 8

Re: Getting Started on mod_python 3.3.

2006-02-14 Thread Jim Gallacher
Graham Dumpleton wrote: Is my list of suggested JIRA items then seen as being reasonable for such a projected release? This seems reasonable, since we have either already committed the fixes or have patches available (I think). Do we want to create a new JIRA issue for the mutex directory i

Re: Getting Started on mod_python 3.3.

2006-02-14 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Jim Gallacher wrote .. > Graham Dumpleton wrote: > > Is my list of suggested JIRA items then seen as being reasonable for > > such a projected release? > > This seems reasonable, since we have either already committed the fixes > or have patches available (I think). I don't have changes ready for

Re: mutex dir?

2006-02-14 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Hmmm, somehow I managed to vapourise an email, didn't even get to my sent mail box. Let me try this again. Jim Gallacher wrote .. > Graham Dumpleton wrote: > > Correct, is actually done from the mod_python module init function. > > > > The only way one could have it dynamically changing is throug

Testing mod_python SVN trunk with Apache 2.2 on Win32

2006-02-14 Thread Nicolas Lehuen
Hi, I've built Apache 2.2 and tested mod_python SVN trunk with it. The two register_cleanup tests fail. Apparently it's because the test code registers a cleanup function giving the current request as parameter. Of course when the cleanup function is called, the request object is no longer valid,