Benjamin Peterson writes:
2010/8/9 Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:10 AM, alexander.belopolsky
python-check...@python.org wrote:
+PS: In the standard Python distribution, this file is encoded
in UTF-8 +and the list is in rough alphabetical order by last
On 8 Aug, 2010, at 6:15, Greg Ewing wrote:
Aaargh, I think I've found out what the problem is.
I'm using framework builds on MacOSX. I have two experimental
builds of Python 3.1 around, plus a standard one installed in
/Library. It's picking up the version of Python.framework in
2010/8/10 Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org:
Benjamin Peterson writes:
2010/8/9 Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:10 AM, alexander.belopolsky
python-check...@python.org wrote:
+PS: In the standard Python distribution, this file is encoded
in UTF-8
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2010-08-01 - 2010-08-07)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues stats:
open2640 (+35)
closed 18679 (+194)
total 21319 (+57)
Open issues with patches:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 06:55:29PM -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 8/9/2010 2:47 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
Terry Reedy:
MingW has become less attractive in recent years by the difficulty
in downloading and installing a current version and finding out how to
do so. Some projects have
Hi,
lately I've been working on the new summary of Python tracker issues.
This is the result.
On 10/08/2010 16.39, Python tracker wrote:
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2010-08-01 - 2010-08-07)
This is the period that is considered for the following stats.
By default it shows the activity of the last
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:28:18 +0300, Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
lately I've been working on the new summary of Python tracker issues.
This is the result.
Thanks for working on this, Ezio!
Issues stats:
open2640 (+35)
closed 18679 (+194)
total 21319
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
..
People need to recognize that any kind of reference is really irrelevant
here. There is no right order that is better than any other right
order. I'd personally object to any English language dictionary telling
me
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:06 PM, li...@gabriel-striewe.de wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 06:55:29PM -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 8/9/2010 2:47 PM, Sturla Molden wrote:
Terry Reedy:
MingW has become less attractive in recent years by the difficulty
in downloading and installing a
On 8/10/2010 10:28 AM, Ezio Melotti wrote:
This is the list of *all* the issues created or reopened during the last
week *that are still open*.
Thank you for removing the duplication of listing issues opened and
closed twice. I otherwise pretty much agree with RDM's comments.
--
Terry Jan
On 8/10/2010 9:13 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2010/8/10 Stephen J. Turnbullstep...@xemacs.org:
Benjamin Peterson writes:
2010/8/9 Nick Coghlanncogh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:10 AM, alexander.belopolsky
python-check...@python.org wrote:
+PS: In the standard
On 8/10/2010 3:25 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
Everyone working on the English-based Python distribution knows the
order of the 26 English letters. Please use that order (including for
decorated versions and tranliterations) instead of various idiosyncratic
and possibly conflicting nationality-based
2010/8/10 Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu:
On 8/10/2010 9:13 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2010/8/10 Stephen J. Turnbullstep...@xemacs.org:
Benjamin Peterson writes:
2010/8/9 Nick Coghlanncogh...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:10 AM, alexander.belopolsky
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
..
If I were committing a patch and was checking to see whether a name that
started with a decorated A (or any other letter) were already in the list, I
would look in the appropriate place in the A (or other) section, not
On 8/10/2010 3:44 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
No, but if he complains about it, we should change it.
If In rough English alphabetical order is extended with unless the
person requests otherwise, then it should also be extended with in
which case the name is suffixed with '(phbr)' [or
I am not 100% happy with this because I am sure people will keep
discovering that the order in the file does not match the order
suggested by their favorite sort program. I was also hoping to learn
from this discussion what the state of the art in in sorting unicode
words is. I believe
If I were committing a patch and was checking to see whether a name that
started with a decorated A (or any other letter) were already in the
list, I would look in the appropriate place in the A (or other) section,
not after Z.
Everyone working on the English-based Python distribution
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
..
So where do you put Γεώργιος Μπουτσιούκης?
or Александр Белопольский for that matter? :-)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Alexander Belopolsky
alexander.belopol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
..
So where do you put Γεώργιος Μπουτσιούκης?
or Александр Белопольский for that matter? :-)
James Tauber did a UCA
Am 11.08.2010 00:35, schrieb Alexander Belopolsky:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
..
So where do you put Γεώργιος Μπουτσιούκης?
or Александр Белопольский for that matter? :-)
If you care about that, feel free to add that spelling to the file.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
..
or Александр Белопольский for that matter? :-)
If you care about that, feel free to add that spelling to the file.
Somebody proposed to put it along with some latin transliteration,
which I can sympathize with.
Based on a pair of tracker issues (#3445 and #9396) I'm considering a
couple of adjustments to functools.wraps for 3.2.
The first (#3445) is a request from ages ago to make update_wrapper
more forgiving when it encounters a missing attribute. Instead of
throwing AttributeError (as it does now),
2010/8/10 Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
Based on a pair of tracker issues (#3445 and #9396) I'm considering a
couple of adjustments to functools.wraps for 3.2.
The first (#3445) is a request from ages ago to make update_wrapper
more forgiving when it encounters a missing attribute. Instead
The second (#9396) came up in the context of the new cache decorators
added to functools, and allowing applications to choose their own
caching strategies. I suggested exposing the original (uncached)
function, and Raymond suggested that the easiest way to enable that
would be for
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org wrote:
The second (#9396) came up in the context of the new cache decorators
added to functools, and allowing applications to choose their own
caching strategies. I suggested exposing the original (uncached)
function, and Raymond
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
The second (#9396) came up in the context of the new cache decorators
added to functools, and allowing applications to choose their own
caching strategies. I suggested exposing the original (uncached)
function, and
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
which would require ignoring the absence of __annotations__.
It turns out the patch that added __annotations__ support also made a
change to make all of the copied attributes optional.
So I'll be tidying up the
On 8/10/2010 10:58 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org wrote:
The second (#9396) came up in the context of the new cache decorators
added to functools, and allowing applications to choose their own
caching strategies. I suggested exposing the
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com wrote:
One of the things that's slightly irking about the decorator syntax is
that a decorator is always called with exactly one argument, and that if
you want to write a parameterized decorator you therefore end up writing
a
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com wrote:
One of the things that's slightly irking about the decorator syntax is
that a decorator is always called with exactly one argument, and that if
you want to write a parameterized decorator you therefore end up writing
a
30 matches
Mail list logo
