On Feb 25 2018, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:02 PM, Nikolaus Rath <nikol...@rath.org> wrote:
>> On Feb 22 2018, Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 1. Inner generator expression:
>>>
>>>
On Feb 22 2018, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> 1. Inner generator expression:
>
> result = [y + g(y) for y in (f(x) for x in range(10))]
>
[...]
>
> And maybe there are other ways.
I think the syntax recently brough up by Nick is still the most
beautiful:
result = [
On Jul 21 2017, David Mertz wrote:
> How implausible is it to write out the actual memory image of a loaded
> Python process?
That is what Emacs does, and it causes them a lot of trouble. They're
trying to move away from it at the moment, but the direction is not yet
clear. The
On Oct 11 2016, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:08 PM, INADA Naoki wrote:
>> From Python 3.4, bytearray is good solution for I/O buffer, thanks to
>> #19087 [1].
>> Actually, asyncio uses bytearray as I/O buffer often.
>
> Whoa what?!
On Sep 13 2016, Tim Peters <tim.pet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu>]
>>> Tim Peters investigated and empirically determined that an
>>> O(n*n) binary insort, as he optimized it on real machines, is faster
>>> than O(n*logn) sortin
On Sep 11 2016, Terry Reedy wrote:
> Tim Peters investigated and empirically determined that an
> O(n*n) binary insort, as he optimized it on real machines, is faster
> than O(n*logn) sorting for up to around 64 items.
Out of curiosity: is this test repeated periodically on
On Jun 21 2016, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> There is a design question. If you read file in some format or with
> some protocol, and the data is ended unexpectedly, when to use general
> EOFError exception and when to use format/protocol specific exception?
>
> For example when
On Jun 16 2016, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 16 June 2016 at 09:39, Paul Moore wrote:
>> I'm willing to accept the view of the security experts that there's a
>> problem here. But without a clear explanation of the problem, how can
>> a non-specialist like
On Jun 09 2016, Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org> wrote:
> On 06/09/2016 07:38 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> On Jun 09 2016, Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org> wrote:
>>> Nope, I want the old behavior back. os.urandom() should read
>>> /dev/random if getra
On Jun 09 2016, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I don't think we should add a new function. I think we should convince
> ourselves that there is not enough of a risk of an exploit even if
> os.urandom() falls back.
That will be hard, because you have to consider an active, clever
On Jun 09 2016, Larry Hastings wrote:
> On 06/09/2016 03:44 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
>> On 06/09/2016 03:22 PM, Larry Hastings wrote:
>>> Okay, it's decided: os.urandom() must be changed for 3.5.2 to never
>>> block on a getrandom() call.
>>
>> One way to not block is to raise
On May 11 2016, Brett Cannon wrote:
> This PEP proposes a protocol for classes which represent a file system
> path to be able to provide a ``str`` or ``bytes`` representation.
[...]
As I said before, to me this seems like a lot of effort for a very
specific use-case. So let me
On Apr 13 2016, Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
> On 04/13/2016 03:45 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>
>> When passing an object that is of type str and has a __fspath__
>> attribute, all approaches return the value of __fspath__().
>>
>> However,
On Apr 13 2016, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 at 22:38 Michael Mysinger via Python-Dev <
> python-dev@python.org> wrote:
>
>> Ethan Furman stoneleaf.us> writes:
>>
>> > Do we allow bytes to be returned from os.fspath()? If yes, then do we
>> > allow bytes from
On Apr 13 2016, Ethan Furman wrote:
> (I'm not very good at keeping similar sounding functions separate --
> what's the difference between shutil.copy and shutil.copy2? I have to
> look it up every time).
Well, "2" is more than "" (or 1), so copy2() copies *more* than copy()
On Apr 11 2016, Jon Ribbens wrote:
>> What I see is that you asked to break your sandbox, and less than 1
>> hour later, a first vulnerability was found (exec called with two
>> parameters). A few hours later, a second vulnerability was found
>> (async generator
On Apr 10 2016, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 02:43:19PM +0200, Victor Stinner wrote:
>>Please don't loose time trying yet another sandbox inside CPython. It's
>>just a waste of time. It's broken by design.
>>
>>Please read my email
On Apr 07 2016, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote:
>> On Apr 7, 2016, at 6:48 AM, Nikolaus Rath <nikol...@rath.org> wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone anticipate any classes other than those from pathlib to come
>> with such a method?
>
>
> It seems like it
On Apr 06 2016, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 04/06/2016 11:15 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
>> Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote:
>>> But fspath(), if it exists, would call __fspath__ on an arbitrary
>>> object, and create a new string -- not a new Path. That may be
>>> confusing...
>>
>>
Hello,
With the upcoming move to Git, I thought people might be
interested in some thoughts that I wrote down when learning Git
for the first time as a long-time Mercurial user:
http://www.rath.org/mercurial-for-git-users-and-vice-versa.html
Comments are welcome (but probably more
On Feb 01 2016, mike.romb...@comcast.net wrote:
" " == Barry Warsaw writes:
>> On Feb 01, 2016, at 11:40 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
>> I don't know about anyone else, but on my own development
>> systems it is not that unusual for me to *edit* the
>>
On Dec 04 2015, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I implemented 3 new optimizations in FAT Python: loop unrolling, constant
> folding and copy builtin functions to constants. In the previous thread,
> Terry Reedy asked me if the test suite is complete enough to ensure that
On Sep 16 2015, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 16 September 2015 at 06:10, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>> The only thing that hg really lost badly on
>> IMO was "named branches", and that's been fixed with bookmarks.
>
> FWIW, I still find bookmarks confusing to
On Sep 16 2015, Chris Angelico wrote:
> With git, there are infinite workflows possible - you aren't forced to
> have a concept of "central server" and "clients" the way you would
> with SVN. Mercurial's called a DVCS too, so presumably it's possible
> to operate on a
On Sep 16 2015, "R. David Murray" wrote:
> The DAG plus git branches-as-labels *fits in my head* in a way that the
> DAG plus named-branches-and-other-things does not.
Hmm, that's odd. As far as I know, the difference between the hg and git
DAG model can be summarized like
ookmark bar
> creates 2 bookmarks. If I then check in a change, I guess *both*
> bookmarks move.
No, only the active bookmark moves automatically:
$ hg bookmark foo
$ hg bookmark bar
$ hg log -r tip
changeset: 0:d1c121e915b8
bookmark:bar
bookmark:foo
tag: tip
user:Nikolaus R
On Sep 17 2015, "Stephen J. Turnbull" <step...@xemacs.org> wrote:
> Nikolaus Rath writes:
>
> > Hmm, that's odd. As far as I know, the difference between the hg and git
> > DAG model can be summarized like this:
> >
> > * In git, leaves of the D
On Sep 16 2015, "R. David Murray" <rdmur...@bitdance.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:17:38 -0700, Nikolaus Rath <nikol...@rath.org> wrote:
>> On Sep 16 2015, "R. David Murray" <rdmur...@bitdance.com> wrote:
>> > The DAG plus git branche
On Sep 16 2015, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 9/16/2015 5:20 AM, Oleg Broytman wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 07:44:28PM +, Augie Fackler
>> wrote:
>
>>> There are a lot of reasons to prefer one tool over another. Common ones are
>>> familiarity,
On Sep 16 2015, Nikolaus Rath <nikol...@rath.org> wrote:
> On Sep 16 2015, "R. David Murray" <rdmur...@bitdance.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:17:38 -0700, Nikolaus Rath <nikol...@rath.org> wrote:
>>> On Sep 16 2015, "R. David Murray&quo
On Sep 16 2015, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Augie Fackler wrote:
>>> but git is still better at it: ``git add -p``
>>> allows me to review and edit patches before commit while ``hg record``
>>> commits immediately.
>>
>> FWIW, I
On Sep 05 2015, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5 September 2015 at 12:36, Nikolaus Rath <nikol...@rath.org> wrote:
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> You are giving
>>
>> runcommand(sh(i"cat {filename}"))
>>
>> as an
On Sep 04 2015, "Eric V. Smith" wrote:
> I've made a number of small changes to PEP 498. I don't think any of the
> changes I've made in the last week are substantive. Mostly I've
> clarified how it works and removing some limitations. The only
> meaningful change is that
Hi Nick,
You are giving
runcommand(sh(i"cat {filename}"))
as an example that avoids injection attacks. While this is true, I think
this is still a terrible anti-pattern[1] that should not be entombed in
a PEP as a positive example.
Could you consider removing it?
(It doubly wastes resources
On Aug 16 2015, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
2. By far and away the most common use for me would be things like
print(fIteration {n}: Took {end-start) seconds).
I believe an even more common use willl be
print(fIteration {n+1}: Took {end-start} seconds)
Note that not allowing
On Aug 08 2015, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 August 2015 at 11:39, Eric V. Smith e...@trueblade.com wrote:
Following a long discussion on python-ideas, I've posted my draft of
PEP-498. It describes the f-string approach that was the subject of
the Briefer string format thread.
On Aug 08 2015, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote:
On Aug 08 2015, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 August 2015 at 11:39, Eric V. Smith e...@trueblade.com wrote:
Following a long discussion on python-ideas, I've posted my draft of
PEP-498. It describes the f-string approach
cache issue?
Yury
On 2015-08-02 12:38 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Hello,
Looking at the language reference for 3.5.0b4, I noticed that it
mentions neither async nor await.
Is this still going to get updated, or will the only documentation
consist of the PEP itself? I think having a Python
Hello,
Looking at the language reference for 3.5.0b4, I noticed that it
mentions neither async nor await.
Is this still going to get updated, or will the only documentation
consist of the PEP itself? I think having a Python release recognize
keywords that are not mentioned in the language
On Jul 31 2015, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
There are over 400 issues on the bug tracker that have not had a
response to the initial message, roughly half of these within the last
eight months alone. Is there a (relatively) simple way that we can
share these out between us to
On Jul 27 2015, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
That you add one hour to it, and the datetime moves forward one hour
in actual time? That's doable, but during certain circumstance this
may mean that you go from 1AM to 1AM, or from 1AM to 3AM.
Or do you expect that adding one hour
On Jul 22 2015, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 July 2015 at 13:23, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote:
If it were up to me, I'd focus all the resources of the PSF on reducing
this backlog - be that by hiring some core developers to work full-time
on just the open bugtracker
On Jul 21 2015, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
All of this is why the chart that I believe should be worrying people
is the topmost one on this page:
http://bugs.python.org/issue?@template=stats
Both the number of open issues and the number of open issues with
patches are steadily
On Apr 20 2015, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe it'd be of value to have a quick code stripper that takes away
all the annotations, plus any other junk/framing that you're not
interested in, and gives you something you can browse in a text
editor?
If you need to preprocess your
On Apr 21 2015, Paul Sokolovsky pmis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 08:05:59 -0700
Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote:
On Apr 20 2015, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe it'd be of value to have a quick code stripper that takes
away all the annotations, plus
On Apr 20 2015, Harry Percival hj...@cantab.net wrote:
My first reaction to type hints was yuck, and I'm sure I'm not the only
one to think that. viz (from some pycon slides):
def zipmap(f: Callable[[int, int], int], xx: List[int],
yy: List[int]) - List[Tuple[int, int,
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com writes:
As some examples of where bilingual computing breaks down:
* My NFS client and server may have different locale settings
* My FTP client and server may have different locale settings
* My SSH client and server may have different locale settings
* I
Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov writes:
What I fail to see is why it's better to raise an exception and point users
to a better way, than to simply provide an optimization so that it's a mute
issue.
The only justification offered here is that will teach people that summing
strings (and
Hello,
The following commit-ready patches have been waiting for review since
May and earlier.It'd be great if someone could find the time to take a
look. I'll be happy to incorporate feedback as necessary:
* http://bugs.python.org/issue1738 (filecmp.dircmp does exact match
only)
*
Ben Hoyt benh...@gmail.com writes:
So here's the ways in which option #2 is now more complicated than option #1:
1) it has an additional info argument, the values of which have to
be documented ('os', 'type', 'lstat', and what each one means)
2) it has an additional onerror argument, the
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com writes:
On 15 June 2014 14:57, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote:
On 06/14/2014 09:31 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 15 June 2014 10:41, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014, at 15:39, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
It seems to me that a much
Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com writes:
Le 15 juin 2014 02:42, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014, at 15:39, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
It seems to me that a much cleaner solution would be to simply declare
_pyio's readinto to only work with bytearrays
Hello,
The _pyio.BufferedIOBase class contains the following hack to make sure
that you can read-into array objects with format 'b':
try:
b[:n] = data
except TypeError as err:
import array
if not isinstance(b, array.array):
On 06/14/2014 09:31 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 15 June 2014 10:41, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014, at 15:39, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
It seems to me that a much cleaner solution would be to simply declare
_pyio's readinto to only work with bytearrays
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org writes:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014, at 18:06, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Consider this simple example:
$ cat test.py
import io
import warnings
class StridedStream(io.IOBase):
def __init__(self, name, stride=2):
super().__init__()
self.fh
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org writes:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014, at 17:11, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com writes:
On 2014-06-11 02:30, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Hello,
I recently noticed (after some rather protacted debugging) that the
io.IOBase class comes
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com writes:
Also notice that using a list with shell=True is using the API
incorrectly. It wouldn't even work on Linux, so that torpedoes
the cross-platform concern already :)
This kind of confusion is why I opened http://bugs.python.org/issue7839.
Can
MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com writes:
On 2014-06-11 02:30, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Hello,
I recently noticed (after some rather protacted debugging) that the
io.IOBase class comes with a destructor that calls self.close():
[0] nikratio@vostro:~/tmp$ cat test.py
import io
class Foo
Hello,
I recently noticed (after some rather protacted debugging) that the
io.IOBase class comes with a destructor that calls self.close():
[0] nikratio@vostro:~/tmp$ cat test.py
import io
class Foo(io.IOBase):
def close(self):
print('close called')
r = Foo()
del r
[0]
Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com writes:
Such optimizations are important enough that numpy operations always
give the option of explicitly specifying the output array (like
in-place operators but more general and with clumsier syntax). Here's
an example small-array benchmark that IIUC uses
Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com writes:
tmp1 = a + b
tmp1 += c
tmp1 /= c
result = tmp1
Could this transformation be done in the ast? And would that help?
I don't think it could be done in the ast because I don't think you can
work with anonymous temporaries there. But,
Hello,
While my last appeal resulted in quite some commits (thanks!), I still
have some more commit-ready patches waiting for review. It'd be great
if some people could find time to take a look:
* http://bugs.python.org/issue1738 (filecmp.dircmp does exact match
only)
Reviewed patch,
Hello,
I've just run the testsuite of hg tip with
./python -m test -u network,urlfetch -j 8 -G -v
and it finished with
,
| [...]
| test_extract_dir (test.test_zipfile.TestWithDirectory) ... ok
| test_store_dir (test.test_zipfile.TestWithDirectory) ... ok
| test_different_file
Hello,
I was surprised to find the following in bytesobject.c:
,
| [...]
|As always, an extra byte is allocated for a trailing \0 byte (newsize
|does *not* include that), and a trailing \0 byte is stored.
| */
|
| int
| _PyBytes_Resize(PyObject **pv, Py_ssize_t newsize)
| {
| [...]
Hello,
While my last appeal resulted in quite some commits (thanks!), I still
have some more commit-ready patches waiting for review. It'd be great
if some people could find time to take a look:
* http://bugs.python.org/issue1738 (filecmp.dircmp does exact match
only)
*
Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net writes:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 12:10:46 -0700
Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote:
* http://bugs.python.org/issue20951 (SSLSocket.send() returns 0 for
non-blocking socket)
In this case someone just needs to decide if we want to (a) document
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu writes:
[Quote conveniently rearranged]
I've accumulated a number of patches in the issue tracker that are
waiting for someone to review/commit/reject them. I'm eager to make
corrections as necessary, I just need someone to look the work that I've
done so far:
Do
Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org writes:
I apologize for the tone. I need to go *right* now, and can't fix
that. Really, I'm sympathetic and my goal is not just to defend
python-dev, but to help you get the reviews your work deserves.
Please read with that in mind.
Will do - but why
Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de writes:
Am 13.04.14 08:36, schrieb Stephen J. Turnbull:
I admit the tone was biased toward nagging or blaming the victim,
and again I apologize for causing misunderstanding. Nikolaus isn't
wrong for posting here. My claim is that in current circumstances,
Hello,
I've accumulated a number of patches in the issue tracker that are
waiting for someone to review/commit/reject them. I'm eager to make
corrections as necessary, I just need someone to look the work that I've
done so far:
* http://bugs.python.org/issue20951 (SSLSocket.send() returns 0 for
Hello,
The BufferedReader (and BufferedRWPair) classes both have a read1()
method in addition to the regular read() method to bypass the internal
buffer. This is quite useful if you need to do some buffered reading
(e.g. to parse a header) followed by a lot of bulk data that you want to
process
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote:
2. Change the behavior immediately, potentially breaking some
applications that worked around it, but unbreaking others that relied
on the documented behavior.
If it's
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com writes:
Maintainability
---
This policy does NOT represent a commitment by volunteer contributors to
actually backport network security related changes from the Python 3 series
to the Python 2 series. Rather, it is intended to send a clear signal
Charles-François Natali cf.nat...@gmail.com writes:
2014-03-15 21:44 GMT+00:00 Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org:
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org writes:
This downside of using subclassing as an API should be well known by now
and widely warned against.
It wasn't known to me until now
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org writes:
This downside of using subclassing as an API should be well known by now
and widely warned against.
It wasn't known to me until now. Are these downsides described in some
more detail somewhere?
So far I have always thought that, as long as I avoid
Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com writes:
On 03/12/2014 04:49 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
You can use hasattr() in place of AttributeError
I use:
getattr(subject, attrname, default)?
*all the time*.
In my opinion that's almost as ugly, because it still forces you to
specify the attribute
Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us writes:
Example::
b'%4x' % 10
b' a'
'%#4x' % 10
' 0xa'
'%04X' % 10
'000A'
Shouldn't the second two examples also be bytes, ie. b'%#4x' instead of
'%#4x'?
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
Encrypted emails preferred.
PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8
Stephen J. Turnbull step...@xemacs.org writes:
Ethan Furman writes:
On 02/21/2014 07:46 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
but not this:
value = expr except Exception: default except Exception: default
This should be the way it works. Nothing is gained in readability
by
Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org writes:
In the second attempt, the signature looked like this:
sig=(arguments)\n
[...]
This all has caused no problems so far. But my panicky email last
night was me realizing a problem we may see down the road. To recap:
if a programmer writes a
Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org writes:
A comment on your approach so far: I'm very much against giving
default a default value in the constructor.
You mean in the definition of the custom converter class?
I realize that hack saves you having to say = NULL in a lot of
places. But explicit
Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org writes:
All is not lost! What follows is rough pseudo-C code, hopefully you
can take it from here.
typedef struct {
int set;
time_t when;
} clinic_time_t;
#define DEFAULT_CLINIC_TIME_T {0, 0}
static int
with me too. I'd just like Larry to sign off on it, because
as far as I know, he'll be the one to review my patch.
Best,
-Nikolaus
[1] If you set a default value, or put it in brackets as Serhiy later
recommends, it works the same.
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org
Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com writes:
20.01.14 06:19, Nikolaus Rath написав(ла):
This works if the user calls time.gmtime(None), but it fails for
time.gmtime(). It seems that in that case my C converter function is
never called.
What's the trick that I'm missing?
/*[clinic input
Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org writes:
On 01/18/2014 09:52 PM, Ryan Smith-Roberts wrote:
I still advise you not to use this solution. time() is a system call
on many operating systems, and so it can be a heavier operation than
you'd think. Best to avoid it unless it's needed (on FreeBSD it
Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org writes:
On 01/18/2014 09:52 PM, Ryan Smith-Roberts wrote:
I still advise you not to use this solution. time() is a system call
on many operating systems, and so it can be a heavier operation than
you'd think. Best to avoid it unless it's needed (on FreeBSD it
Hello,
I'm trying to convert functions using parse_time_t_args() (from
timemodule.c) for argument parsing to argument clinic.
The function is defined as:
,
| static int
| parse_time_t_args(PyObject *args, char *format, time_t *pwhen)
| {
| PyObject *ot = NULL;
| time_t whent;
|
|
the PyArgs_ParseTuple code from parse_time_t_args
* Declare seconds as a plain object in Argument Clinic
* Call the modified parse_time_t_args on seconds first thing in the _impl
functions
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to convert
Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us writes:
Nikolaus,
Good write-up. Please submit it to the bug tracker:
http://bugs.python.org
Submitted as http://bugs.python.org/issue19414.
If someone gives me the go-ahead for one of the proposed solutions, I'd
be happy to create a full patch.
Best,
Hello,
The documentation says the following about modifying a dict while
iterating through its view:
| Iterating views while adding or deleting entries in the dictionary may
| raise a RuntimeError or fail to iterate over all entries.
(http://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#dict-views)
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org writes:
1. Having to enter the values is annoying. Sorry, I read the rationale and
all that, and I *still* want to write a C-Like enum { A, B, C }. I fully
expect to edit and reorder enums (if I ever use them) and get irritated with
having to update the value
On 04/30/2013 07:05 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org writes:
On 04/29/2013 07:42 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
State is a class, it just inherits from enum. Thus:
type(State) == type(enum) == type(EnumMetaclass)
issubclass(State, enum) == True
If you'd tried it, you'd
Armin Rigo ar...@tunes.org writes:
Hi Jeff,
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Jeff Allen ja...py@farowl.co.uk wrote:
In Jython, (...)
Thanks Jeff for pointing this out. Jython thus uses a custom
mechanism similar to PyPy's, which is also similar to atexit's. It
should not be too hard to
Armin Rigo ar...@tunes.org writes:
Hi Nikolaus,
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote:
It's indeed very informative, but it doesn't fully address the question
because of the _pyio module which certainly can't use any custom C code.
Does that mean that when
Marco Hemmelrath marco.hemmelr...@googlemail.com writes:
class State(enum):
idle = 0
busy = 1
idling = idle
ideling = 0
together with the premises:
1. type(State.busy) == State
2. type(State) == enum
State is a class, it just inherits from
Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info writes:
I'm sorry, but all these suggestions are getting the API completely
backwards by making the common case harder than the rare case.
We're creating an Enum, right? So the *common case* is to populate it
with enum values. 99% of the time, enumerated
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org writes:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
While this will certainly work, it means you can't have class variables that
happen to be the same type as the enum -- so no int in an IntEnum, for
example.
The solution I like
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org writes:
On Monday, April 15, 2013, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Brian Curtin br...@python.org javascript:; writes:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Nikolaus Rath
nikol...@rath.orgjavascript:;
wrote:
[ Note: I already asked this on
http://stackoverflow.com
Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info writes:
On 26/04/13 13:22, Greg wrote:
On 26/04/2013 3:12 p.m., Glenn Linderman wrote:
On 4/25/2013 7:49 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
You couldn't create an enum of callables, but that would be a
seriously weird thing to do anyway
But aren't all classes
Brian Curtin br...@python.org writes:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote:
[ Note: I already asked this on
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15917502 but didn't get any
satisfactory answers]
Sorry, but that's not a reason to repost your question
[ Note: I already asked this on
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15917502 but didn't get any
satisfactory answers]
Hello,
The description of tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile() says:
,
| If delete is true (the default), the file is deleted as soon as it is
| closed.
`
In some
100 matches
Mail list logo