Brett Cannon wrote:
On 10/10/05, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 01:47, Calvin Spealman wrote:
Never created for a reason? lumping things together for having the
similar usage semantics, but unrelated purposes, might be something to
avoid and maybe that's why it
Nick Coghlan wrote:
As a location for this, I would actually suggest a module called something
like metatools,
-1, too vague and meaningless a name. If decorator is the
official term for this kind of function, then calling the
module decorators is precise and helpful. Other kinds of
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 01:47, Calvin Spealman wrote:
Never created for a reason? lumping things together for having the
similar usage semantics, but unrelated purposes, might be something to
avoid and maybe that's why it hasn't happened yet for decorators. If
ever there was a makethreadsafe
On 10/10/05, Barry Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 01:47, Calvin Spealman wrote:
Never created for a reason? lumping things together for having the
similar usage semantics, but unrelated purposes, might be something to
avoid and maybe that's why it hasn't happened yet
Sorry, Nick. GMail, for some reason, doesn't follow the reply-to
properly for python-dev. Forwarding to list now...
On 10/9/05, Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Based on the discussion, I think I'd go with defaultproperty.
Questions:
- Should this be in builtins,
