martin at v.loewis.de writes:
Now that we do have the PEP, I think that should be done properly.
I thought you offered to rewrite it. Formally, I could accept the
PEP being withdrawn, and the feature integrated anyway, but I still
consider that bad style.
So: I can offer to rewrite the
After talking with Martin and several others during the language
summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I don't
remember who, but some suggested it should just be a regular old
feature instead of going through the PEP process. So...does this even
need to continue the PEP
2012/3/29 Brian Curtin br...@python.org:
After talking with Martin and several others during the language
summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I don't
remember who, but some suggested it should just be a regular old
feature instead of going through the PEP process.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 17:45, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
2012/3/29 Brian Curtin br...@python.org:
After talking with Martin and several others during the language
summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I don't
remember who, but some suggested it
On 3/29/2012 3:50 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 17:45, Benjamin Petersonbenja...@python.org wrote:
2012/3/29 Brian Curtinbr...@python.org:
After talking with Martin and several others during the language
summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 18:08, Glenn Linderman v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com wrote:
All it needs is official acceptance now, and integration into the release,
no?
If it wasn't clear, this is what I said in the first post.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
2012/3/29 Brian Curtin br...@python.org:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 17:45, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
2012/3/29 Brian Curtin br...@python.org:
After talking with Martin and several others during the language
summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I don't
Brian Curtin brian at python.org writes:
Vinay - is the code you have on bitbucket ready to roll into CPython,
thus into the installer?
I believe the main C launcher code is ready to roll into CPython. However, the
standalone installer I provide uses WiX rather than msilib, and includes
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 17:45, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
2012/3/29 Brian Curtin br...@python.org:
After talking with Martin and several others during the language
summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397
Zitat von Brian Curtin br...@python.org:
After talking with Martin and several others during the language
summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I don't
remember who, but some suggested it should just be a regular old
feature instead of going through the PEP process.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 22:48, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
Now that we do have the PEP, I think that should be done properly.
I thought you offered to rewrite it.
There are definitely areas that I would like to work on, especially
pulling implementation details out and replacing with, as you
11 matches
Mail list logo
